Public Modlogs
Check the mod logs of any subreddit that uses /u/publicmodlogs
Friday Free TalkWeekly open discussion thread
I find vandalizing bathrooms is a cowardly and lame move… you gotta play something a bit larger and riskier!
[ Removed by Reddit ]
________________________________
Nerede yaşıyorsun? Sıkıntı çıkacağını düşünmüyorum ama pek bir etki yaratacağını da düşünmüyorum.
Wikipedia is capitalistIf you don't know, Wikipedia is run by a hyper-capitalist hierarchy. The system works like this: at the very top there are "stewards", they have full power over all wikis and have most of their activities hidden from scrutiny. Below them each wiki appoints an Arbitration Committee (hereinafter ArbCom), this is supposedly democratically elected, but is really rigged. Each ArbCom appoints two groups of users: Oversighters, whose job is supposed to be to remove private information that was unintentionally publicly exposed, but in reality they heavily abuse this power to hide all real criticism of them and other insiders. CheckUsers, who investigate "sockpuppetry" which is when a user creates another account after being blocked from editing by an admin. This activity is forbidden on Wikipedia and all edits made by "Sockpuppets" (hereinafter "socks") are removed, regardless of if they were beneficial or harmful. Checkusers job is to investigate cases of sockpuppetry and to block the sockpuppets. They are able to view editors private information to find other accounts using the same or similar information to do it. The information is kept for only 90 days to comply with government regulations, but a lot of it is illegally moved onto a separate, private wiki hidden from scrutiny, where it is illegally kept for ever. Another level of user is bureaucrats, their job is to appoint the lower groups below them. Below bureaucrats are administrators, who are supposed to mainly block vandals and spammers, but they are EXTREMELY corrupt and block anyone that disagrees with them and bully people into submission.
[Also Wikipedia's founder is Ayn Rand supporter](https://mronline.org/2020/06/16/meet-wikipedias-ayn-rand-loving-founder-and-wikimedia-foundations-regime-change-operative-ceo/)
Freedom to roamHow can someone be arrested and called a criminal for walking on unbuilt, undeveloped land. People like Ted turner can literally own a whole wilderness and it’s just screwed up to me like how can one dude own all that. How could someone own a 14er like Culebra peak, it’s unfair not to mention the way the once dude owns culebra is from his fathers oil money. Literally destroying land so he can have his own land.
Amazon is getting to me;
I was extorted from Telegram-FTC not to shop-on Amazon.
but I ignored the demands, and I carried a 100$ giftcard.
I thought their starting wage was fair, at 14$ an hour in a 9$ meal state.
where did we go wrong? I am pro-proprietary. Amazon is clunky and durable, and that's the lead into the vulnerabilities. imagine malwares, malfunctioning wares,
"nesting in their programmes like an ant-pile".
after a certain moment, there's nothing wrong with my devices. the only missing issue after purging my operating system; was the over-routing of power grid that drives-up the bills. is anyone torrenting off of Anansong? that suffix is the North Korean word for "ideation". But the barracks said to delete my installs. Soon my controls will return to normal.
(including Amazon firmware)
I sold my shares in the corporation to FBI to troll the corporation.
please cease and desist the convergences on me;
about Amazon in the name of "Anabelle Wininsky" (Self).
PS.
"Amazon was the oldest contention in my exigence."
Let's talk marxismSo, I have sorta complicated views on marx and marxism, and I would love some input from other libsocs.
Basically, I think that there is some value in marx's work. Personally, I think his understanding of capitalist economics is probably the best we've seen.
His theory of crisis, unequal exchange, alienation, etc are all pretty valid. And I particularly liked how his conclusions are more or less natural conclusions drawn from the work of the classical political economists. His economic analysis of capitalism, and his broader analysis of class conflict inherent to the economic system are valid.
With that said, I do think that there are some flaws in marx's thinking. The most obvious to me is his take on the state and the "dictatorship of the proletariat". Capitalism can only be sustained by the state because it requires inherent coercion to work, and the only body with the ability to enact coercion on a large scale is the state. Simply shifting ownership of the MOP to the state, as opposed to workers directly, will inevitably result in a concentration of power in the hands of the bureaucratic class, the new capitalists of this state capitalism. It's not all that fundamentally different, it's just colored red.
Abolition of the state will lead to the abolition of capitalism and more or less ensure it cannot return. Marxists are over-reliant on state power and state privilege and have too much faith in the incorruptibility of collective action. And on that front we ought to oppose marxists.
But that's not to say that there's nothing useful or right there. Personally, I find marxist economics (i.e. its analysis of capitalism) to be the most valuable thing about it. Sure, their preferred solutions to that aren't great, but the analysis itself is pretty solid. Perfect? No. But solid.
I also think that marx misunderstood or didn't properly engage with anarchist thought (namely proudhon, ask any mutualist about marx and you'll hear mixed things, poverty of philosophy definitely has flaws, i think c4ss has an article on it if i am not mistaken). I think there is some room to engage with libertarian marxists though, they're an interesting bunch.
Thoughts? What do you think is valuable about marxism? Where are your disagreements with it?
Let's talk marxismSo, I have sorta complicated views on marx and marxism, and I would love some input from other libsocs.
Basically, I think that there is some value in marx's work. Personally, I think his understanding of capitalist economics is probably the best we've seen.
His theory of crisis, unequal exchange, alienation, etc are all pretty valid. And I particularly liked how his conclusions are more or less natural conclusions drawn from the work of the classical political economists. His economic analysis of capitalism, and his broader analysis of class conflict inherent to the economic system are valid.
With that said, I do think that there are some flaws in marx's thinking. The most obvious to me is his take on the state and the "dictatorship of the proletariat". Capitalism can only be sustained by the state because it requires inherent coercion to work, and the only body with the ability to enact coercion on a large scale is the state. Simply shifting ownership of the MOP to the state, as opposed to workers directly, will inevitably result in a concentration of power in the hands of the bureaucratic class, the new capitalists of this state capitalism. It's not all that fundamentally different, it's just colored red.
Abolition of the state will lead to the abolition of capitalism and more or less ensure it cannot return. Marxists are over-reliant on state power and state privilege and have too much faith in the incorruptibility of collective action. And on that front we ought to oppose marxists.
But that's not to say that there's nothing useful or right there. Personally, I find marxist economics (i.e. its analysis of capitalism) to be the most valuable thing about it. Sure, their preferred solutions to that aren't great, but the analysis itself is pretty solid. Perfect? No. But solid.
I also think that marx misunderstood or didn't properly engage with anarchist thought (namely proudhon, ask any mutualist about marx and you'll hear mixed things, poverty of philosophy definitely has flaws, i think c4ss has an article on it if i am not mistaken). I think there is some room to engage with libertarian marxists though, they're an interesting bunch.
Thoughts? What do you think is valuable about marxism? Where are your disagreements with it?
This. So much of this. I feel like his analysis of capitalism is basically invaluable. Really thorough and really great. But I get the sense as I read his less scholarly stuff that I don’t like him: He seems pompous and to your point, way too confident.
But I’ve noticed a lot of other leftists I don’t necessarily agree with (such as Marx, Lenin, etc.) wrote some very great critiques. They were excellent at pointing out holes in other ideologies. The problem came in enacting their own.
Basic principles of war propaganda
Basic principles of war propaganda
TIL : Environmental activist Julia “Butterfly” Hill lived in a 1500 year old California redwood tree (known as Luna) 180 feet (55 mm) off the ground for 738 days in order to prevent it from being chopped down by Pacific Lumber Company. She successfully saved the tree.
How does Anarchism deal with a situation like this?Imagine we live in anarchy. Everyone in the world is in an anarchist organization that decides what they need, how to produce it, and how to distribute the product. I decide that I want to leave and that I would rather farm my own plot for my family and I. Next year I make a surplus of wheat, so I bring it into town and barter it for something I need with another person. After a while, we realize this bartering system is less efficient than it could be, so gradually we begin to trade a universal commodity instead of bartering. A person decides to put up a stand where they sell their recipe of home baked bread. After they gain some popularity they begin buying some of my surplus, they get more popular and put up a proper store, and I decide that I like baking so I decide to go work for him. He hires more people, puts up stores in other towns, etc. Wouldn't we be back in capitalism?
How does Anarchism deal with a situation like this?Imagine we live in anarchy. Everyone in the world is in an anarchist organization that decides what they need, how to produce it, and how to distribute the product. I decide that I want to leave and that I would rather farm my own plot for my family and I. Next year I make a surplus of wheat, so I bring it into town and barter it for something I need with another person. After a while, we realize this bartering system is less efficient than it could be, so gradually we begin to trade a universal commodity instead of bartering. A person decides to put up a stand where they sell their recipe of home baked bread. After they gain some popularity they begin buying some of my surplus, they get more popular and put up a proper store, and I decide that I like baking so I decide to go work for him. He hires more people, puts up stores in other towns, etc. Wouldn't we be back in capitalism?
Looking to make friends in hawaiiI’ve lived in honolulu my whole life. I’m tired of this capitalism system. I live on a island that has been exploited the fuck out of. I get shitty job after shitty job. I will never support politicians or the state. I don’t do drugs, don’t have sex. I just want to find like minded people to talk to and hang out with. I’m done with everything.
Looking to make friends in hawaiiI’ve lived in honolulu my whole life. I’m tired of this capitalism system. I live on a island that has been exploited the fuck out of. I get shitty job after shitty job. I will never support politicians or the state. I don’t do drugs, don’t have sex. I just want to find like minded people to talk to and hang out with. I’m done with everything.
Join the revolution!!! lol
The Problem with Mini-America
Bookchin is blowing my mind but i love it. maybe we can go beyond mutual aid.
Anybody on about the earth quake in Rojava?Anybody know about the earth quake in Rojava*
Surprised this sub is so silent about this. Idk why I, an inactive Reddit user who hasnt posted in months is the first to say it.
Any news on how they're dealing with it? Or what people outside of Rojava are doing to help out?
looking for books about rojava that also have anarchist critique in them do you guys know any?
Bookchin’s Anthropology.Curious if anyone is aware of any investigation or critique into the anthropological basis of Murray Bookchin’s philosophy. Read The Ecology of Freedom recently and was wondering how valid the anthropological evidence he references (for example, matricentric societies lacking hierarchical structures) is especially after half a century of further research. Has anyone looked into this?
Poem Praising KROPOTKIN - by ChatGPTOh Peter Kropotkin, a man of great might,
A champion of freedom, and a beacon of light.
He stood for the people, and fought for their rights,
His visions of equality, still shining so bright.
With wisdom and knowledge, he led the way,
In the pursuit of justice, night and day.
His theories of mutual aid, still hold so true,
Inspiring the masses, in all that they do.
Oh Kropotkin, your legacy lives on,
As a hero of freedom, your story lives on.
We honor your courage, and your selfless fight,
For a world of equality, with freedom and light.
I'm trying to make an anarchy discord but I genuinely don't know what to put on it. pls can someone help meHere's the link to the discord I added an idea area so we can have everyone's ideas be put in. https://discord.gg/zWJMEJmB
\+1
Guess what just got thrown away !Take that Microsoft !
Police are always scared for their lives. They are the most fearful people on the planet, yet we give them guns and protections when they murder people.
Soldiers exercise much more discipline and deescalation tactics than cops ever do. Soldiers are the ones literally going in to battlefields where people actually are shooting at them every day, yet they are still more disciplined. If police want to be militarized so bad, they should be expected to practice similar rules of engagement.
Read the rules in the sidebar and stop setting the sub up for trouble.
is resistance really violence?I have been trying to talk with and understand anarchists and leftists desire to remain "non violent" in protest and in direct action against police violence and the government sanctioned murder and oppression of civilians. In my book, resistance under any means necessary is not violence, it is self defense, and that violence inherently denotes power/oppression. "Non violent" protestors will often say "we are better than that, we are better than they are" when stopping other demonstrators from defending themselves or when trying to dismantle direct action initiatives I've been in relation too. Like as a movement, we want to revolt but only in the way they are technically allowed to?
Am I missing something? Maybe I am ingnorant or naive. But aren't we literally being killed in the street by a bunch of fascists? And essentially letting it happen by not arming and organizing ourselves and seizing the precincts by force?
I'm obviously angry and I think the infighting on the left is often what keeps things from changing, but just not sure why there hasn't yet been a call to truly resist the oppression with substantial force. Maybe some of y'all have a perspective I haven't heard yet that can help me make sense of it. I just figure if the gov/pigs are gonna kill us, they might as well have to work for it, and we might as well give revolution a real honest try.
TLDR:
Looking for incite. Why not really fight back?
I guess I hope people give a fuck about their ecosystems, but, yeah, I guess we'll see.
There's a bunch of very effective disinfo surrounding this subject. I've said it before, we need better propaganda.
Spot the ~~fed~~ (AVERAGE REDDIT ENJOYER) that insinuates folks with disabilities will necessarily suffer, and they'll never specify what that disability is or acknowledge societies where the ill defined disability gets support.
I'll see ya back here after.
[ Removed by Reddit ][ Removed by reddit on account of violating the [content policy](/help/contentpolicy). ]
My grandpa(cop) did a drive by shooting with his dad(also a cop) and got fired (his dad did not)
Killing random people sitting on a throne never works because they simply get replaced. You need to smash the established order to enact long-lasting actual change. Murdering people also never looks good & is pointless. Murdering other humans has a horrible impact on ones sanity, unless you're a psychopath & most people are not.
I've seen a video of exactly this scenario happening. Guy had a cane and the cop called it a weapon. The man showed them it was a cane and the cop kept insisting that he was frightened because it could be a weapon. I don't think he was killed. It could happen though.
So what? They say that if the police are trying to kill you, and you try to defend yourself, you are just as bad as them? Again, I find it extremely hard to believe that people actually said that to you and you aren't wildly misrepresenting them.
My position is more that even if every anarchist in the US was armed, they still wouldn't pose a real challenge to existing power structures, because anarchists would have civilian small arms and molotovs and the government has tanks, bombs and drones.
The way for anarchists in the US to become a threat to the government isn't to give into the propaganda by thee small arms industry that you should have a gun, because otherwise you're not safe, but to expand the movement, educate and convince people, show that anarchism works... And make sure that by the time the US government does start thinking of anarchists as a threat to their rule, that not only will the anarchists of that day say 'no' to negotiating with the government, but that the soldiers that the government then orders to shoot them will say 'no' too, because they too are sympathetic to anarchism (or outright anarchists) themselves.
Keep in mind, by the way, that despite being in The Netherlands, a country with pretty prominent gun control, I legally owned two firearms (a .22 Anschutz rifle and a .45 Browning 1911) for quite a while before I sold them during the pandemic, since I wasn't getting out to the range any way.
So, you know, I'm not opposed to gun ownership. I'm actually a bit of a gun enthusiast... But you shouldn't buy a gun just because you feel unsafe. Because buying a gun under that motivation doesn't make you personally any safer and it actively makes people in your direct surroundings less safe.
why u so mad bro? 😩
New zinehttps://www.reddit.com/r/Green_Anarchism/comments/10pq77b/confronting_a_silent_assassin_intoxication/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb
New zinehttps://www.reddit.com/r/Green_Anarchism/comments/10pq77b/confronting_a_silent_assassin_intoxication/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb
"toda casa brasileira já teve" - Elaine Pereira
Anarchism is a broad term that encompasses a variety of theories for societal organization. It doesn’t mean no government but rather an absence of hierarchy.
Anarchism is critical of all forms of unjustified authority. That becomes the litmus test for tearing a particular form of governmental or corporate tyranny down. You’re right, it is not the absence of government, but instead direct democracy. There’s different strands that modify this analysis, such as anarcho-syndicalism or more federalist forms of anarchism, but the general tendency among all anarchists is to advocate for direct democracy.
And most anarchists are pacifists.
Yeah you can hide in your bubble all you want, but how are you gonna extend your bubble to all of society? Who are you going to fight? What are you going to do? Kill everyone who disagrees? Only include people who are 100% on board? Who gives you the authority? Isn't having the authority to do either of those things against your plan?
Video 2 is the street cam, Videos 3 & 4 are individual body cams, as is Video 1.
If youre someone who might struggle with those kinds of videos, please listen to the warning. I'll try and provide a snapshot:
To me, they lost it out of humiliation at pepper spraying themselves and him getting away from 4 of them, after the initial traffic stop. They then chased him down and beat him to death for it.
Theres no way police officers who've seen the results of those kinds of beatings before didnt know that what they were doing would kill him. At the very least, its not a good enough excuse. If that's "only" second degree murder, then the system is beyond broken. I think the smaller charge is why the government et. al. are shitting bricks. It wasnt a heat of the moment fight. It was a gangland execution.
More so, all the other cops who are just standing around with him in that state, beaten so badly that he can't even sit up, not helping him, are culpable to.
Makes me sick to my stomach. That poor man.
5 Memphis cops charged with murder in Tyre Nichols' death
Still using the same straw man that Engels did. Tell me, when the slave revolts and kills their master, are they suddenly a slave driver themselves?
And we most certainly can use force to end hierarchy without establishing our own. It's really quite simple, we just stop commanding them after we oust them from power. They're free to go as they wish, do what they want, and associate with whoever, it really does not matter.
Your attempt at word games only works if you're unfamiliar with anarchist understandings of these things. Me taking a gun and holding a tyrant at its point while I take his shit does not make me a tyrant as well.
I recommend going to r/Anarchy101 as questions on what abolition of hierarchy, and revolution, means are asked there quite often.
The word government is not universally defined nor understood as "command and domination". Government is also understood as the process by which policy is decided, and in that sense, anarchists want every single person to participate in government.
Furthermore, anarchists do intend to command and dominate certain class and political enemies, and so it makes no sense to claim that they are opposed to those concepts as concepts.
Nobody is arguing about the nature of private and personal property, why did you feel the need to bring it up and what do you think it is clarifying in this discussion?
If anarchist revolution isn't going to dominate and suppress the bourgeoisie, how is it going to overthrow them? Anarchism is wholly reliant on force and coercion, as all revolutionary movements must be. It's not possible to talk the capitalists out of power, we have to use force to remove them.
You can imagine whatever you want about the relative peacefulness of post-rev society, I think it would be considerably more peaceful than the current one (because of abolishing private property), but the process of achieving it cannot in any practical or honest terms be described as peaceful or free of coercion.
You cannot use force to deprive people of their possessions without dominating them.
Anarchism is not against the revolutionary working class dominating the people who exploit them.
Therefor anarchism is not against "domination" as a principle, but is in favor of its use within a certain (proletarian revolutionary) framework.
I'm not actually accusing you of being a lolbert, I'm accusing you of being semantically inconsistent. I do believe you are an anarchist, I do believe you support proletarian revolution, I just also believe you are playing word games and so I am playing them back.
Anarchism is not against domination, and that's that's good thing, because if it was, it wouldn't be a revolutionary position.
The point is that anarchists do in fact seek to limit the autonomy of bad actors (capitalists). This limitation of the enemy's autonomy is both good and necessary.
I don't follow what you're saying about money? I am opposed to money and markets, it seems others in this thread are not.
The Playbook: How the authorities try to suppress unrest in response to police murders
FUCK THE POLICEDetails including an interview with Tyre's mom [here](https://edition.cnn.com/2023/01/27/us/tyre-nichols-memphis-friday/index.html). Tyre called out for his mom in the video three times.
I won't post the video, but it is available now.
Friday Free TalkWeekly open discussion thread
The Playbook: How the authorities try to suppress unrest in response to police murders
FUCK THE POLICEDetails including an interview with Tyre's mom [here](https://edition.cnn.com/2023/01/27/us/tyre-nichols-memphis-friday/index.html). Tyre called out for his mom in the video three times.
I won't post the video, but it is available now.
FUCK THE POLICEDetails including an interview with Tyre's mom [here](https://edition.cnn.com/2023/01/27/us/tyre-nichols-memphis-friday/index.html). Tyre called out for his mom in the video three times.
I won't post the video, but it is available now.
Chatbots are now banned from r/Anarchism. Please report them if you see them posting.The users in our decision-making subreddit r/metanarchism have passed a rule banning chatbots, meaning accounts that use ChatGPT or other machine-learning language models to simulate conversation.
Ordinary bot scripts that respond to specific keywords, transciber bots, automoderator, and other non-chatbots are still permitted by default. Content, screenshots, and discussion posted by actual users **about** chatbots will also be permitted by default. Only the chatbots themselves are banned.
A new rule has been added to our [rules page](https://www.reddit.com/r/Anarchism/about/rules/). Please report chatbots using the rule if you see them on r/Anarchism. Thanks!
The vote thread may be viewed [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/metanarchism/comments/107lchf/proposal_introduce_a_rule_banning_undeclared_ai/) by all users with metanarchism access. Metanarchism access is open to all users meeting [these criteria](https://www.reddit.com/r/Anarchism/wiki/metanarchism); if you qualify but do not yet have access and wish to read the vote or participate in future votes, please message the moderators.
FUCK THE POLICEDetails including an interview with Tyre's mom [here](https://edition.cnn.com/2023/01/27/us/tyre-nichols-memphis-friday/index.html). Tyre called out for his mom in the video three times.
I won't post the video, but it is available now.
Abeleism
Abeleism
Abeleism. Banned by the moderators
Abeleism
Abeleism
Abeleism
Abeleism
My new rib tattoo that I am completely, utterly in love with.
The term "band" +"wagon" is apparently abeleism in this sub according to dipshit modsBan me or fix it. I'll come back with a new email.
Just so everyone knows everything you say is "abeleism" according to this sub.
“Who Has To Do It?”
“Who Has To Do It?”
Liberatory Education 101
To do: Inform Frantech Solutions aka. buyvm.net that they are hosting fascist websitesFranTech Media, also known as BuyVM is hosting fascist/Nazi/white supremacist websites that call for violence against minorities.
Make sure they know they are hosting this content. They might not know.
"DailyStormer.name" and "antipodean-resistance.info" are clear white supremacist content.
https://i.imgur.com/A9ANgBJ.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/CKuws2J.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/hwYA3YZ.jpg
Listed host contact info for FranTech:
Phone +1-778-977-8246 (Office)
Email admin@frantech.ca
fdias@frantech.ca
Twitter: https://twitter.com/frantechca
Website: https://my.frantech.ca/contact.php
Anarchist and libre alternatives to social media: A comprehensive listReddit | [Raddle](https://Raddle.me)
Facebook | [Diaspora](https://diasporafoundation.org/)
Twitter | [Mastodon](https://joinmastodon.org/), [ni.hil.ist](https://ni.hil.ist/about), [kolektiva.social](https://kolektiva.social/explore)
Youtube | [AnarchyTube](https://anarchy.tube/videos/overview)
Gmail/Hotmail | [Riseup](https://riseup.net/)
Instagram/Imgur/Flickr | [Pixelfed](https://pixelfed.org/)
Wordpress.org | [noblogs.org](https://noblogs.org/), [network23](https://network23.org/), [Pleroma](https://pleroma.social/)
Whatsapp | [Signal](https://signal.org)
Slack, Discord | [Matrix](https://matrix.org/)
Craigslist | [Freecycle](https://freecycle.org/)
Google Maps | [OpenStreetMap](https://www.openstreetmap.org/)
Thoughts on anarchist literature projectI've just finished the first draft of a short non-fiction book that aims to be an introduction to anarchism for the average person. It's a kind of 'anarchism for dummies' that doesn't require too much previous knowledge of politics, economics, or social philosophy. It attempts to share the core principles of anarchism in a non-confrontational and down to earth manner, whilst challenging popular misconceptions of anarchy, anarchists, and anarchism.
I had an idea of placing stickers with QR codes in public spaces in order to distribute the book, though my main issue with this idea is that I'm not sure exactly what those QR codes should link to.
My first thought was that I could simply upload the text to the Anarchist Library and link the QR code on the stickers to the URL. However, I'm worried this will be counterproductive to the purpose of the book. If the average person (in my town at least) opens the link up on their phone, I know there is a very strong chance they'll think "Anarchist library? Ugh... I don't know exactly what anarchy is (but I think it's bad/crazy/naïve/etc.) and I sure as shit don't like libraries, so I'm out". I think this is the reality I have to face while living in a remote city with many conservative thinkers.
My second thought was to create a website that would feature the key ideas of the book, however, this website could be built in a way that would reduce the likelihood of people immediately shutting off. Instead of people being immediately confronted with anarchism (or even worse, libraries!), the QR code could link to a page where they could be introduced to the central topic without being spooked by what they probably think is 'lefty propaganda'. This seems like the best approach to take in the circumstances.
The main issue that I have with the 'website option' is that, with my skillset as is, I might end up having to pay to use a website builder/hosting company. Money is not the issue here, I would simply prefer not to have to use a company like Wix or Weebly or similar.
I'd really appreciate any advice that the community may have for me based on my goals and circumstances.
Specifically, I'm wondering...
* What do people think of this approach to the distribution of anarchist literature?
* Is there something I've overlooked or haven't considered that might be helpful to know?
* Can anyone recommend an alternative to the online services I've mentioned above, or know of a better way to achieve the same goals?
Thanks in advance to all!
Yeah, I get why things like this are said (I've made similar statements in the past), but my point is still the same. It's harmful messaging, and while one instance of graffiti with this sentiment won't do much harm, it doesn't help, and the more common this messaging is, the more harmful it'll be. It reminds me of that whole 'kill all men' thing (which is luckily a lot less common now)