Public Modlogs

Check the mod logs of any subreddit that uses /u/publicmodlogs

February 3, 2023 11:36:55
community_styling:
added_styling secondary banner positioned image, banner positioned image, banner positioned image position, banner background image, banner background image position, banner background color, banner height, mobile banner image (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
February 3, 2023 11:36:28
editsettings:
upload_image headerimg (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
February 3, 2023 11:35:35
editsettings:
upload_image headerimg (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
February 2, 2023 15:30:31
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
I think this what the Community Discord essentially is. People can have much faster, more casual conversations without a variety of the restrictions inherent to Reddit and rules of this subreddit. This is generally what I recommend for people looking for something quicker with more direct interaction.
February 2, 2023 01:32:40
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Well this explains a lot! Great job mods!
February 2, 2023 01:32:35
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Thank you mods! Your work is always appreciated. Please keep us updated on any developments regarding this situation and stick post so it stays visible.
February 2, 2023 01:32:32
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Really epic investigation, I haven't seen stuff like this on any other subs, idk if it's because other mods aren't doing this level of investigation or this is the only sub that is being targeted, great work tho I hope you guys have enough mods to run this sub, I wish I could help but I'm just too busy
February 2, 2023 01:32:32
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Really epic investigation, I haven't seen stuff like this on any other subs, idk if it's because other mods aren't doing this level of investigation or this is the only sub that is being targeted, great work tho I hope you guys have enough mods to run this sub, I wish I could help but I'm just too busy
February 2, 2023 01:31:36
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
The way I see it, the more effort that goes into those posts to divide the users, it at the very least adds credibility to the post.
February 2, 2023 01:31:12
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
There are three levels for every automod rule (i.e. ways they can be applied): 1. Auto-report- just reports the post/comment, so mods see it in the modqueu 2. Auto-filter - the post/comment is not publicly visible until a moderator approves it from the modqueue 3. Auto-remove - Mods never review it, the post/comment just gets removed. I wouldn't be suggesting we auto-remove anything personally. We also wouldn't necessarily be applying any rule in a vacuum, since they can all be combined. For example, we have a rule which auto-filters only posts from users who aren't verified and have less than 10 combined karma in the subreddit. Those nuances are what make deliberating a bit intensive, but also not necessarily as restrictive as what you might be thinking.
February 2, 2023 01:20:18
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
At this point it’s becoming a tool moderators use to prevent trolls/hate/porn/spam/bots. You can set it to remove and manually approve comments. It’s a bit more work but really helps communities.
February 2, 2023 01:20:17
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
At this point it’s becoming a tool moderators use to prevent trolls/hate/porn/spam/bots. You can set it to remove and manually approve comments. It’s a bit more work but really helps communities.
February 1, 2023 18:01:31
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Even though it was essentially a rehash of information that we've all heard multiple times over, I never really get tired of listening to it again. I especially enjoyed the production quality and the effort put into this video. As far as Mick West goes, let him be himself. He has a role to play in this saga and he's fulfilling that as a necessary skeptic. Do I agree with what he says? No, not really. I put my trust in the professionals that defend our country, their instrumentation, and their well-honed instincts. They are all in a much better position than any of us are to comment on what this may or may not be and deserve to be heard and respected regarding this issue. I look forward to more videos like this, and again, even though it's essentially a rehash of what has been seen before, it may be something new to someone else. It's also important to keep this issue moving forward so it doesn't grow stagnant in the public's mind and die on the vine.
February 1, 2023 17:57:09
wikirevise:
Page usernotes edited "create new note on new user ----Jb" via toolbox (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
February 1, 2023 17:56:43
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Well that was interesting as fuck?!! I wasn’t expecting that at all!! I was reading this thread shaking my head in dismay until I read your post! 🥂
February 1, 2023 17:54:48
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
We're of multiple minds regarding this. There are contexts where this can seem more-or-less to be referring to the OP or someone in the thread. In those cases, it would be removed based on R1. Although, most of the time it is a generalization and not a directed comment. In those cases, I think it should be allowed. We do still use Toolbox usernotes in either instance and flag users where appropriate to built a context history for future reference.
February 1, 2023 17:52:29
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Incorporating has_verified_email seems like a great idea, thank you for suggesting it. We have karma-related rules, but we could certainly revisit them.
February 1, 2023 17:00:50
wikirevise:
Page usernotes edited "create new note on new user DinoWzrdKing" via toolbox (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
February 1, 2023 05:00:14
submit_scheduled_post:
submitted on Wed, 1 Feb 2023 04:00 AM CST (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Subreddit Updates & Announcing UFOS.WIKIHey everyone. We've updated the subreddit wiki and migrated it to a new domain: # [UFOS.WIKI](https://ufos.wiki/) We've made a number of new additions and broken it into multiple pages to accommodate more forms of content. Lets us know your thoughts on how it looks, what else we could add, and if you'd be interested in contributing. # r/UFOsMeta We've added a new rule based on our [proposal](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/100mjr7/subreddit_updates_january_2023/) last month: >Rule 12: Meta-posts, meaning posts focused on moderation, subreddit critiques, rule changes, and feature requests, must be posted in r/ufosmeta. You can subscribe to or post/comment in r/ufosmeta if you'd like to engage in our ongoing conversations there. # New 'Report' post type We've added a new 'Report' flair type for posts and created a new [Report a Sighting](https://ufos.wiki/track/reports/) page to explain the new options for users to facilitate the use of this new post type. Report posts will allow users to use a template when submitting a sighting to ensure they provide the most relevant information. The goal here will be to offer a more detailed form of sighting post with a consistent format and which is searchable. # Proposal: Update Rule 2 (Posts must be on-topic) to only apply to posts. [More details are here.](https://www.reddit.com/r/ufosmeta/comments/10fpc4j/update_rule_2_posts_must_be_ontopic_to_only_apply/) Currently, the existing rule text is inconsistent as our internal setting allows users to report comments for being off-topic and some moderators currently remove topics based on this rule. The proposal would be to change the setting and forgo removing off-topic comments moving forward, [based on these aspects.](https://www.reddit.com/r/ufosmeta/comments/10fpc4j/update_rule_2_posts_must_be_ontopic_to_only_apply/) ​ We welcome any feedback or questions you have regarding these changes and updates. Additionally, what are your thoughts on the state of the subreddit overall?
February 1, 2023 05:00:14
sticky:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Subreddit Updates & Announcing UFOS.WIKIHey everyone. We've updated the subreddit wiki and migrated it to a new domain: # [UFOS.WIKI](https://ufos.wiki/) We've made a number of new additions and broken it into multiple pages to accommodate more forms of content. Lets us know your thoughts on how it looks, what else we could add, and if you'd be interested in contributing. # r/UFOsMeta We've added a new rule based on our [proposal](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/100mjr7/subreddit_updates_january_2023/) last month: >Rule 12: Meta-posts, meaning posts focused on moderation, subreddit critiques, rule changes, and feature requests, must be posted in r/ufosmeta. You can subscribe to or post/comment in r/ufosmeta if you'd like to engage in our ongoing conversations there. # New 'Report' post type We've added a new 'Report' flair type for posts and created a new [Report a Sighting](https://ufos.wiki/track/reports/) page to explain the new options for users to facilitate the use of this new post type. Report posts will allow users to use a template when submitting a sighting to ensure they provide the most relevant information. The goal here will be to offer a more detailed form of sighting post with a consistent format and which is searchable. # Proposal: Update Rule 2 (Posts must be on-topic) to only apply to posts. [More details are here.](https://www.reddit.com/r/ufosmeta/comments/10fpc4j/update_rule_2_posts_must_be_ontopic_to_only_apply/) Currently, the existing rule text is inconsistent as our internal setting allows users to report comments for being off-topic and some moderators currently remove topics based on this rule. The proposal would be to change the setting and forgo removing off-topic comments moving forward, [based on these aspects.](https://www.reddit.com/r/ufosmeta/comments/10fpc4j/update_rule_2_posts_must_be_ontopic_to_only_apply/) ​ We welcome any feedback or questions you have regarding these changes and updates. Additionally, what are your thoughts on the state of the subreddit overall?
February 1, 2023 05:00:14
unsticky:
replaced (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
r/UFOs Collaborative Youtube PlaylistHey everyone, We’d like to experiment with a collaborative Youtube playlist. It will contain videos added by the community which you think are relevant to ufology. If you’re reading this, you’re welcome to add to it right now by going to link below and selecting ‘Continue’. It will then appear as an option whenever you’re viewing a video on Youtube and click the ‘Save’ option. Let us know your thoughts on this idea and any suggestions you might have in the comments below. *Disclaimer: adding content to this playlist will attach your YouTube account name to the videos you add. If this is a concern for you, simply suggest the content in the comments below.* # [Add to the playlist](https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLdemXDhd4FBMv0TVQvq_ffTjdoKdyQ8hx&jct=L82hfnO8YEE5EL6NxSfk8ZaqZTxt-g)
January 31, 2023 07:07:51
wikirevise:
Page usernotes edited "create new note on new user Bobsyerfrickenuncle" via toolbox (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
January 31, 2023 07:07:42
wikirevise:
Page usernotes edited "delete note 1675166621000 on user Bobsyerfrickenuncle" via toolbox (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
January 31, 2023 07:03:41
wikirevise:
Page usernotes edited "create new note on new user Bobsyerfrickenuncle" via toolbox (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
January 31, 2023 07:03:30
wikirevise:
Page usernotes edited "delete note 1675166562000 on user Bobsyerfrickenuncle" via toolbox (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
January 31, 2023 07:02:42
wikirevise:
Page usernotes edited "create new note on new user Bobsyerfrickenuncle" via toolbox (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
January 31, 2023 07:02:36
wikirevise:
Page usernotes edited "delete note 1675166046000 on user Bobsyerfrickenuncle" via toolbox (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
January 31, 2023 06:54:06
wikirevise:
Page usernotes edited "create new note on new user Bobsyerfrickenuncle" via toolbox (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
January 29, 2023 20:29:44
edit_scheduled_post:
"Subreddit Updates & Announcing UFOS.WIKI" body (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
January 29, 2023 20:27:28
edit_scheduled_post:
"Subreddit Updates & Announcing UFOS.WIKI" body (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
January 27, 2023 20:09:28
sticky:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, Scared-Background247. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10n17oa/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 2: This subreddit is specifically for the discussion of Unidentified Flying Objects. Please post other topics to their appropriate subreddits. Anything that primarily focuses on the hypothetical occupants of UFOs (aliens, other beings, etc), rather than the UFOs themselves, must relate to a specific sighting(s). Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 27, 2023 20:09:27
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, Scared-Background247. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10n17oa/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 2: This subreddit is specifically for the discussion of Unidentified Flying Objects. Please post other topics to their appropriate subreddits. Anything that primarily focuses on the hypothetical occupants of UFOs (aliens, other beings, etc), rather than the UFOs themselves, must relate to a specific sighting(s). Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 27, 2023 20:09:27
editflair:
flair_edit (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Report of personal experiments and research findings: preliminary conclusionsGains in science are sometimes made by logic, when a new observation has an ultimately obvious explanation; this was not one of those cases. Leaps in science are sometimes made accidentally. I conducted two different experiments, by myself, using myself as guinea pig. I did these over the course of many years. One of the experiments had to do with the statistical frequency, geographical spread, and nature of UFO sightings. My thinking went: UFO sightings happened anywhere, happened regularly, and happened bizarrely- some of the behavior being “alien-like”, and some of the behavior being abstraction-like. UFOs were perhaps either aliens or perceptual error. If it was perceptual error, it belonged in the realm of psychology. Curious about what they were, and noting the frequency and spread of sightings, I wondered this: would anyone who determined themselves to go out UFO-watching, every single night, or even regularly, for years and years on end, be guaranteed eventually to see a UFO? Note that, in retrospect, this is similar to asking a question like: does going UFO-watching *cause* UFO-sightings? Try to hold that thought. My other experiment was at first unrelated, and was about a phenomenon that actually even less was known about: visual hallucination. Visual hallucination was so rare that it was essentially unstudied. I had some questions and wanted to be the first to break ground on the topic. I came up with an experiment that had two components to it: in part it would test whether visual hallucination could be induced in any person. In part it would test whether visual hallucination was actually a form of dreaming: a sort of accident where the brain starts dreaming somehow while the person is awake and has their eyes open. It was the only thing I could guess that visual hallucination was, since it didn’t make sense to me otherwise, mechanically. How could anyone see anything that wasn’t there, looking through transparent and unobstructed eyeballs just like everyone else has? This was primarily a sleep-deprivation experiment: I reasoned that perhaps with enough sleep-deprivation you could get your brain to start dreaming while you were awake. First I want to tell you about the UFO experiment, which I had begun in the 2000’s, years earlier than the hallucination experiment, and which I had already had some successes with. My first major success happened after several years of consistent, regular trying. There had been minor successes that I considered indeterminate- maybe a small UFO briefly/far away. Then, in 2010, I had a major sighting, of lots of UFOs, over several nights, some that looked like spheres, some that looked like aerial craft of some sort, and some that looked like large abstractions, up in the woods. Friends with me at the time saw some of it, too. I captured a little of it on video. No question it was whatever “UFOs” are. Up close, it gave me the impression that it was some bizarre phenomenon, and not aliens, and not perceptual error. The forms seemed life-like, but too nonsensical to be likely life-forms. It seemed to be something even more bizarre. I didn’t know what to make of it or how to report it; I didn’t bother at the time. I just kept my notes and video (I had managed to capture a bright light appearing and disappearing in the air on the last night) and kept thinking about it. A friend on this trip who saw a glowing sphere with me, up close, about forty feet away from us and about ten feet off the ground, maybe ten inches wide, that suddenly appeared in mid-air, and then disappeared when we ran toward it, kept saying the same thing about it afterward, that they remembered it and couldn’t explain it. That footage I later lost but I held onto the notes I had made of everything I had seen. Some years after this, in 2014, I started running my hallucination experiment. Sure enough, my bet was right on the money. As it turns out, if you stay awake long enough, you do force your brain to dream, “with your eyes open”, and this is visual hallucination; it places dream-images into your field of view, right alongside all the other things you’re seeing. Finally I had explained the mechanism. I was hoping to write a paper on this, for the field of psychology. I decided to first increase the experiment duration though, to try to get an even more dramatic result before I sat down to write. There would still be a question of whether-or-not this was what was going on in the brains of people who have visual hallucination but who are not sleep-deprived. My feeling was that this was going on anyway, but somehow was happening without sleep-deprivation in those people. Here, though, as I tried to increase the sleep-deprivation amount, to deepen the hallucination quality and have a little more to write about in my description, I got instead a shocking result- let me explain what I had been seeing so far in my experiment: something like a color spot that would appear in my vision, that had a sort of flat, 2-d look to it, and that I could tell was “in my eyes” or, mind, though it appeared superimposed in the environment, and that would sort of go in and out of looking image-like. What happened one night was that this same sort of color spot, with increased sleep deprivation, instead of expanding, lasting longer, or turning into a more specific form, turned 3-d looking, like it was actually there- not something in my eyes or mind but something in the room. I mean it went from looking like a hallucination, to looking like it was an actual, external, floating hologram, outside of myself, that I could pick up a camera and take a picture of. It was like a little semi-transparent floating orb. It lasted briefly like this and then it disappeared. Certain of my instincts, that I had seen what I thought I saw, I decided to continue this line of research as a project. I wanted to see whether I could make this effect happen again, and capture it on film this time. In the ensuing months and years, I developed a technique to increase the body’s chances of producing this effect, and, I found that I indeed was able to capture these effects, when they occurred, on film. You cannot capture a normal hallucination *on film*; if I was capturing these on film, they were externally visible. Soon I had gotten proof on video that these holograms were mind-produced, when in 2015 I was able to capture one that was of something that obviously was produced by my own subconscious: a representation of the backside of a car that I had been looking at earlier in the day (here is that footage: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kTUG021NEhU](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kTUG021NEhU). Only the glowing tail-lights of the “car” are visible in the footage because it was taken in the dark and the cell-phone camera over-compensated for the brightness of certain parts of the hologram and dimmed itself automatically; in person, a complete outline of a car was dimly visible around the tail-lights. It was like a glowing, semi-transparent, holographic model of a car, floating in air, absolutely still but sort of shifting over a couple of minutes and then disappearing, located right where the top of a bush was, a few feet away from me, and sort of covering the top of the bush. This hologram lasted a couple minutes and then started to disperse; I caught the tail end of this happening on video. The “car” was about three feet wide, four feet long, and about three feet above the ground; here is a video taken of the exact same spot during the daytime, with a spin-around so you can see the area: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xo4N\_TgX4M4](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xo4N_TgX4M4). You can see that this was on a small hill with a wall behind it; there’s nothing that could have been reflecting and there’s no way a real car could have been parked in that same spot. This footage is not very clear but I invite anyone to analyze it). It’s difficult to catch these on film because they happen at random times, all of a sudden, and don’t last long. After years of doing this, though, I had observed hundreds of different productions of this effect, many of which were extremely impressive. I compared these all to the entire history of UFO sightings: I found that the catalog of different examples I had made of this effect matched the UFO record, which seemed as well to be divisible into spheres, indistinct forms, and distinct forms, whose shapes and behaviors further matched mine. I found that the spheres were the easiest to do, indistinct forms were a little harder to do and were something of a progression beyond the sphere shape which apparently was the basic form of this, and that, at “max power” of the effect, and most rare and difficult to do, were full-forms, where it looked like a complete, real object, rather than just a sphere or some weird shape. I found that this matched the UFO canon exactly: the UFO record can be divided into incidences of mostly spheres, followed by incidences of “weird shapes”, and most rarely, what are apparently fully-formed images. What I realized was that the technique that I had devised, wherein a person could increase their chances dramatically of producing one of these, was somehow happening anyway, rarely yet regularly, in the normal population. I worked to identify specifically which factors of momentary behavior can cause the “launch” of these effects in a “normal-conditions” person, meaning a person who is not intentionally trying to do one of these, but who accidentally does one. There are several factors I found that individually or together can increase the chances of someone doing one of these or that can cause one of these. In general I term this type of effect “**external**” **hallucination** (as I later found, this is a class of effects, of different types, that I have further termed. The effect currently being discussed, which pertains to all “UFOs”, and some other things, I have termed specifically “**external visual hallucination**”, as it is in effect, visual hallucination, *externally*). Here are the **factors** that pertain somewhat to all external hallucinations and specifically to external visual hallucination, and discussions of how they are found in the regular population: First of all, if the extremely rare effect of external hallucination occurs, it tends to happen **when** or after **a person** **mentally dissociates**, for a relatively long time, often **while** happening to have a **high heart rate and/or blood pressure**. There are mechanical reasons for this which I will discuss later on. “Dissociate” is a term I have had to borrow and modify somewhat for my own purposes. I am using the word as follows: when someone’s thoughts absorb their own attention fully, such that, even though they have their eyes open and are even perhaps performing tasks, they actually have gone momentarily blind to their own sensories, such that, they aren’t really seeing what’s happening, they’re losing track of time, and when they “return” from this state, they won’t have a memory of what they saw while they were thinking or of how long they were thinking for. This can happen quickly or this can go on for a long time. The truth is, everyone actually dissociates every time they think at all. It’s just that it usually happens for so short a time that it doesn’t interfere with anyone’s normal flow of tasks or cause accidents. Usually it’s happening for split seconds, or at most a few seconds. Now, while this is happening, the person also has to be having an unusually high heart rate and blood pressure. Basically when you combine high heart rate/blood pressure with mental dissociation, you are in a configuration for possibly launching an external hallucination, but not guaranteed to do so, it is still a rare chance. Further, there are similar trends that go with and increase the chances if combined, or that can sometimes stand alone to cause these: **Sleep deprivation**\- sleep deprivation goes hand-in-hand with a technique that requires high heart rate and mental dissociation, because, sleep deprivation does both of these things to you- on one hand, sleep deprivation increases, not decreases, your heart rate / blood pressure, because, your body has to work harder to overcome the fatigue of muscles. If you’re sleep deprived, you will notice that your heart is pumping faster than usual, while you’re being active, as part of keeping you awake and moving. Second, sleep deprivation shortens, dramatically, your short-term memory, because basically your brain is tired. Shortening your short-term memory increases your tendency to dissociate, because you forget what’s going on faster and it increases your propensity to “tune out” and be lost in thought momentarily. Most people are vaguely familiar with “difficulty concentrating” while tired. Without intentionally trying to sleep-deprive oneself, many people regularly get sleep-deprived anyway for various reasons and still show up for work the next day anyway. Someone who’s just had a baby, for instance, is likely to be sleep-deprived for the first couple of years. Someone who is simply stressed, excited, depressed, thoughtful, uncomfortable, or bothered, like by loud noise outside, or like by bed bugs, during the night, can get sleep-deprived. Some people suffer from insomnia which they consider otherwise cause-less. Some people lose sleep from simply having too much work to do and doing it, staying up all night. Some people stay up all night partying, drinking, having sex, and then go in to work the next day without having actually slept. Any sleep-deprivation is one way I’ve found of increasing the chances of accidentally externally hallucinating. The incidence of sleep-deprivation in the regular population is high enough, upon consideration, to be a factor. The following **emotions** can be said to increase the chances of external hallucination, because, they do the same thing: **excitement, wonder, fear**. Each of these, or combinations, for any reason, will increase heart rate / blood pressure and will increase your dissociation tendency. These can happen to any person at any time, but, for some more often or with more guarantee than for others, for example, anyone undergoing military training exercises. This is one of the reasons why external hallucination incidents are found to happen more often on military bases / ranges than elsewhere; it’s actually because they’re doing exciting and death-defying things on a regular basis, and how those emotions play into the configuring of a person’s body to be in the external-hallucination mode. Also true in warzones. In general, **extreme physical activity**, exertion, exhaustion, and **variations of exhaustion** like dehydration, hunger/fasting, and muscle fatigue can increase the chance. Activity increases heart rate & blood pressure, exhaustion increases dissociation. When fighter pilots pull high G’s, their incidence is likely raised by blood-pressure spiking. **Belief** can also be said to be a factor on its own as I’ve found, meaning, if you are confident that you will see a **certain thing**, or very curious about seeing a certain thing, this actually helps do it, or can on its own in some cases be enough to do it, especially if many hours are spent trying. What you think you’ll see, or wonder if you’ll see, consciously affects what your subconscious will project. Here is a discussion on the effects of **pharmaceuticals/drugs**, various, on external hallucination chances. Understand, there are two different hallucination effects: “internal” (regular type) and external, but only one hallucination ability; so, you cannot, at one time, do both at kinds at once, though you can rapidly go from doing one kind to doing the other. The two effects work a little differently and have different causes. So, in general, things that increase the chance of internal hallucination decrease the chance of external hallucination. Hallucinogens, believe-it-or-not, decrease your ability to externally hallucinate, because they make you internally hallucinate. Anything that’s a sedative decreases your ability to externally hallucinate, and may-or-may-not increase your ability to internally hallucinate. Anything that is any kind of stimulant increases your chances of external hallucination. There are some drugs that can be said to make you woozy or drowzy or spaced out, but are not quite sedatives, that may increase your ability to dissociate, and that may work by simultaneously increasing your heart rate while relaxing your muscles, or other ways- if it increases your ability to dissociate it can help with external hallucination. Anything that dilates your pupils will help with internal hallucination, but won’t help with external unless combined with a high heart rate. Also, **repeated scanning of the sky** has a propensity to aid EVH, especially over many hours. This is something that anyone in the front seat of an aircraft is likely to be doing, hence their increased effect-successes. It can be similar for people on boats, or, in front of sensor-equipment bays/monitors. Looking through the historical data, it seems that just looking through a monitor of some kind can be enough to launch an EVH in the vicinity, outside of the “visual range” of the person, yet arguably “within” their visual range if you consider that the monitor image, tied to real-world data, is a type of real-world extension of their eyesight. This issue bears some further discussion, but, for now, consider it a possibility. Here’s a very important point to make- when external hallucination happens, it **gives no feel** at all to the effecting person, no internal indication that lets them know that it happened. If it doesn’t happen at the center of your vision, you have to otherwise notice that it’s happened and know enough to understand what it is and be able to diagnose who “launched” it, whether it was probably you or someone else nearby, based on who was most likely to have, using the info above. Without knowing all this, if you did one, you would have no idea that you had done it. You would just assume it was something else. This is why this phenomenon has gone on so long, historically, without anyone figuring out what it really is. I only figured this out by the accidents of my story first of all, and then by finding ways of increasing the effect to produce it intentionally, and then by studying it a lot. So, if you make one, you won’t feel anything different at all happen in your brain; you’ll have no way of knowing if you’ve just made one, unless it appears at the center of your vision. If it appears anywhere outside the center of your vision, you’ll just have to look around and notice whether or not one of these things is floating around near you. **External Visual Hallucination Atmospheric Holograms** **Definition**: EVH is an extremely rare, and difficult-to-produce phenomenon, which can nonetheless happen to anyone under the right conditions, and which regularly happens accidentally, wherein: a person’s brain, sensories, and body stimulate the atmosphere into producing a type of hologram, ranging from base-form spheres to other shapes, determined by the person’s subconscious. These are visible to the person, and to other people, and to sensors. They may reflect or emit various waveforms, or do so at times. These are able to be captured in photographs and on video, including in infrared. EH effects can also interfere with electronics or instruments. **Range**: EVH will appear, and then disappear, anywhere within the visual range of the person producing them, and will be visible to that person and any other persons or sensor equipment also within visual or sensor range of the EVH atmospheric hologram (EVH-AH) produced. Consider that, if someone goes outside and looks up, the range and altitude of spots they can focus their eyes on is many miles, and, at night, even further. In general EVH can happen anywhere from inches in front of a person’s face to miles away in the atmosphere, and can scale in size accordingly, from a few inches wide if right in front of you, to a few feet wide starting about ten feet away from you, to tens or even hundreds of feet wide at maximum if far away. EVH-AH seem to be able to form behind or to the side of a person also, outside their direct visual path at the moment but within their visual “range” if they turn their head. **Duration**: EVH-AHs can last anywhere from a few seconds to a few hours, but most last under a minute; many last only a few seconds. **Shapes**: There are three important categories for visual identification of EVH by shape: **Spheres**\- These are the base effect of EVH. They can appear as singles or multiples, are relatively small-sized, and will either glow yellow, amber, or orange, or they will reflect opaque white or silvery. They also can sometimes show up in infrared-only, in which case they will be invisible to the naked eye but viewable on an infrared or a regular digital camera, which are somewhat infrared-sensitive. **Indistinct/**“**Geometric**”- Anything that isn’t a perfect sphere, and isn’t a specific recognizable form either. Any plain shapes, or strange, or hybrid-looking shapes fall into this category. Things that have outline and shading but not distinct features, or that have nonsensical hybrid features. More rare than spheres and the second relative level of the effect. The designs of these are actually subconscious abstractions of, or composites of, plain shapes and regular, every-day objects and sights that the effecting person has seen- a sort of accident of the subconscious. Sometimes these will flash, mimicking airplane lights, even moving similarly (spheres may likewise be an abstraction of the sun or reflections of the sun, stars, headlights, streetlamps and so forth, that you see peripherally/subconsciously throughout your day). **Distinct**\- Any fully-formed image of any kind qualifies as the rarest category of EVH. Mostly EVH comes in its base form of spheres or in the step above that where the subconscious has started making a sort of image but only gone so far. At max, EVH can be a fully-formed image of some kind that has a complete set of thematic discerning details that stay stable while it’s visible. The give-away for distinguishing them is that they’re nonsensical, something that shouldn’t exist or shouldn’t be floating in the sky, also, that they appear out of nowhere and then disappear into nowhere after seconds to minutes. A building floating in the sky, a giant fish going across the sky, a cartoon character going across the sky, a flying saucer hovering. “Ghost photos” also fall into this category. In the rare instances like this, you are seeing the maximum level of the effect of EVH. **Motions**\- Spheres, which are the base effect of EVH, will exhibit very clearly at times, three of six different peculiarities of motion that EVH are capable of: 1. Sitting perfectly **still** at a spot in the air, even with wind blowing. 2. **Hovering** around at a spot in the air, as if wind were blowing, without wind blowing. 3. Taking off, or abruptly changing course, going **nonsensical speeds**, about as fast as you can move your own center of vision across the horizon. 4. The “distinct” class can actually display **motion consistent with** the **theme** of the image. 5. The “indistinct” class will usually do either a sort of slow and steady **float**, like a cloud, or: 6. It will do any type of nonsensical, **bizarre** movement (and/or semi-thematical motions, for half-formed images). Note though that any of the types can do any of these motion patterns. **How to classify and report on events**: Observers should try to get footage; people should make sure to keep at least a cell-phone camera with them. Observers should classify EVH events by their shape: sphere-type, indistinct-type, or distinct-type, then, specifically describe the appearance and behavior, and note the duration. Observers should then indicate whether or not, as far as they know, they were the first person in the area who noticed the AH, and, if they were the closest person in the area to it. If someone else saw it first and pointed it out to them, they should indicate that, and who that person was, and that person’s report should also be collected. Everyone in an area where an EVH-AH happened should be interviewed for any effects they may have noticed. If an observer believes that they were the first who noticed it and/or were the person closest to it, then, they may have been the one who effected it, and so: they should then go on additionally to note: everything they can remember about what their mental, emotional, and physical states were like and what they were thinking and doing at the following times: when the event started, just before the event started, during and throughout the event, several hours leading up to the event, and, some general notes in kind about the time frame of several days leading up to the event. They should be asked how much sleep they got on each of the nights before the event. They should be asked if they were on any medications, stimulants, sedatives, or substances of any kind, and how much and how often on that day and the other days. Finally they should be asked how many EVH events they have seen in the past or perhaps done, and what types they were. No one should have any concern about reporting these or about doing these, even multiple times. EVH are normally harmless and can happen to anyone, even to someone who is fully sober and unperturbed, and even to someone who is competently doing their job. Collecting more data will help to verify and to study these further. It is likely that EVH-AH events are under-reported. **National Security Risk**\- The foremost national security risk that these pose has to do with them being misidentified as plausible, or even as implausible, real-world threats. EVH-AH are subconsciously mind-controlled, albeit, as such, with a sort of lag and latency. The problem with thinking that they are “a real, hostile, alien spacecraft”, or a “real, experimental technology of a hostile foreign nation” is that doing so can modify the behavior of the AH to act more like one of those things, causing the AH to “turn on you” and start chasing the person producing it. A pilot who unknowingly produces, and sees, an EVH-AH, that they think is a hostile UFO, that then turns on them and starts chasing them like it’s a hostile UFO, is at risk of reacting accordingly and stalling and crashing their plane or running out of fuel and having to bail out while trying to out-maneuver it, or, inappropriately discharging their weapons at it. An operator at the terminal of an early-warning radar station is at risk of seeing an EVH-AH on their scopes and thinking it’s an incoming ICBM or ICBMs. It seems EVH-AHs are able to be picked up or locked onto by sensor equipment. A person confronting one should be confident that the EVH-AH will behave harmlessly toward them. Even distinct-type EVH-AHs imperfectly mimic real-world objects; they are easily discernible and they noticeably appear and disappear. People who are assigned to monitor real risks like those (incoming warheads in sovereign airspace, or, hostile foreign aircraft in sovereign airspace) should keep a short-list handy in their minds of the real-world behaviors of the objects they’re supposed to track, for instantly analyzing whether a blip is likely to be the real thing or is possibly an EVH-AH. For example, real ICBMs should only come from certain directions, i.e. the nations that possess them and would fire them, along certain paths, at certain speeds, and in certain numbers. Operators should be trained not to panic at anything that doesn’t have all of the attributes that it should have if it were the real thing. Similarly, for aircraft, a blip moving nonsensically may be an EVH-AH rather than novel and hostile foreign aviation technology. It should remain a policy to scramble jets to visually approach and confirm unidentifieds. Everyone who works in such jobs in the military should be told what EVH is. Briefing everyone on what these are will mitigate the risks associated with them, because, at outset the subconscious production of these things is emotionally “neutral”, meaning, they basically don’t do anything other than float around for a few minutes and then disappear, if you understand what they are and therefore react to them emotionally “neutrally”. Make sure to look for the give-away of appearance and disappearance, on sensor scopes or visibly (some ufologists used to think that this was evidence of alien crafts teleporting in and out, or using invisibility camouflage, or travelling to Earth at light speed and stopping on a dime, then taking off again at light speed from a standstill). **How it works**\- It may turn out that external visual hallucination atmospheric holograms are actually something other than a type of hologram. I will discuss that. If they are what can be called a type of hologram, they probably work like this: the basic principle of **holography** is beam-splitting and self-interfering. Here is an extremely simplified analogy for those unfamiliar: You take a light beam. You look up close at it. You can see little wave lines going across it, where the actual light waves are. Now you take that whole beam and you split it into two beams, and you send them in different directions. Then, you take them and bring them back together, so that they’re crossing through each other somewhere. You look closely at that area where they’re crossing. Now, where all the little light waves from each of the two beams have crossed each other, there’s an “interference-pattern” where the waves have criss-crossed. What’s special about that interference pattern is that it’s actually a type of readable measurement of how far those two beams travelled away from each other and at what angles. In other words, you have a type of three-dimensional description of what the rest of the system of beams is doing. Now, if you reflect one of the two beams off of an object before the beams cross, you get a three-dimensional description of that object and its location in space, too, along with the rest of the beam info, at the interference pattern. This is not the finished hologram in a holography setup, but, this is how the holographic information is transmitted. In a holography setup, the final step of making the hologram product is to use a piece of special film that can develop interference patterns, and you shine the interference pattern onto that film and develop it; you’re left with a “hologram”. Keep in mind the part about interference patterns and how the information is transmitted. Now I’m going to show you how I found that the human body might actually utilize holographic principles, which is something that has never been looked for in anatomy. Here’s a short example: Shoot a light beam at the skull. Where the skull has two eyes, that beam will be split into two beams, going into the skull. Behind the eyeballs, that split beam crosses, in the optic chiasm, a piece of the body most people aren’t familiar with that sits between the eyes and the brain and is in the shape of an X. From there it goes into each side of the brain, where, as you know, you interpret these images three-dimensionally, and, you store them and are able to reproduce them, also in 3-d. The brain qualifies therefore as some type of holographic film. The eyes, optic chiasm, and brain may qualify as a beam-splitter, interference-pattern generator, and holographic film. Holography is done with coherent laser light, but perhaps incoming visible light is cohered or “straightened” within the eyeball, which can be said to have four back-to-back lensing layers when you consider the cornea, the aqueous humor, and the vitreous humor in addition to the lens. Or maybe incoming light is amplified anywhere in the eyes/optic chiasm/brain system, or amplified and resonated, making it coherent somewhere internally. If the optic chiasm’s wires actually cross through each other at all, it’s possible that an interference pattern is generated there for both sides. If it turns out that the optic chiasm has no holographic properties, and is as already described in anatomy as basically just two overlapping wires that do not interact, then the holographic process might be happening entirely in the brain, via the link between the two hemispheres: light from each eye shines into its corresponding brain hemisphere, where each side is also able to shine through into the other hemisphere through the linkage between them, thus interfering in both sides, to put it all simplistically. If the light gets converted to electronic signals or chemical-electric signals in the brain you could look for a corresponding type of interference. If something like that is happening, here is how the whole thing can possibly work in reverse, to “develop the air” into a hologram. First of all, appreciate that, when the brain receives information, it’s inputting, but when it replays that information, when it thinks, dreams, hallucinates, it’s essentially outputting that information. Second, appreciate that when you dream, the scenery is often lit to the level of full daylight. Somewhere within the system of your brain, optic chiasm, and eyes, light is being produced, visible within your eyeballs. If your eyes would be open when this would happen, they could be emitting some light, even if a small or reflected amount. Consider the “red eye” effect of pupils in photographs- it’s assumed to be reflected light, but could the pupils be emitting light at all? What about infrared light? What if correlate interference patterns from both sides of your brain are re-emitted back out through the optic chiasm, emitted out the eyeballs in a split-beam configuration, and then converged on a single spot in the air where you are focusing your eyes? If it is a minute amount of interfered-light output, what if it’s a repeating signal, and the atmosphere is actually pumped by this until a hologram is achieved at a certain spot, much like how a laser’s medium is pumped, either electrically or photonically? If the retina is a type of photocell sensor, that takes in light at its front end and gives you electricity at its back end, consider this analogy: a microphone is another type of sensor, that takes in sound at the front end and gives you electricity at its back end. Reversed, it works as a speaker; if you give it electricity at its back end, it’ll put out sound from its front end. Might it be that the retina works the same way? Also, has anyone ever checked whether a retina takes in light at its front and puts out light at its back? It may be that a retina is more like a fiber-optic harness, or like some photosensor that inputs and outputs light. Do you know how, when you close your eyes, there’s sort of a faint, static-like, color-glow to look at, just barely? This may be a “reverse-ouput” from your brain, that turns brighter and focuses output images when dreaming. Perhaps what you’re actually seeing is the front side of your retina, reflecting off the inside of your lens, allowing the image to seem superimposed and focused in front of you. All these are just some guesses I have about how external visual hallucination would work, holographically, if the product of external visual hallucination is indeed a hologram. Know that no one has otherwise figured out how to produce a “free-standing hologram” that projects into air, or, a “360-degree hologram” that you can look at from all sides, or an opaque hologram, nor are there terms to distinguish such things. Nonetheless, this may be how it’s done; the product EVH-“object” *seems* to be holographical. If EVH products are better described as purely “**electrical**”, or, “static-electrical”, here is my guess as to what the analogy would be: first, consider this common system: a computer hard drive, wires, and a monitor: image-information stored on the hard drive, is connected electrically through the wires, to the monitor which can display the information. In our case, the air would have to be the monitor, but how would that be? And what would the wires be? Obviously, the brain would be the hard drive. Consider these: air is flouresce-able, if an especial current or discharge is run through it. Air will light up. Most people don’t realize that when they see lightning, they’re not “seeing electricity”; electricity is, at all times and in any amounts, completely invisible. What they’re seeing is the air flourescing from how much voltage is being run through it. Also though they’re observing how much static electricity builds up in the atmosphere. If there’s that much sometimes, how much is there other times? Perhaps enough to play with. Consider also that air rainbows; it prisms, and it can glow the different plasma colors. There would be a way, essentially, to use the air as a “monitor”. Now, what would the “wires” be? Consider that the body is completely conductive; that’s why we can get electrocuted. Consider that the outside of the body regularly becomes even more conductive via sweating. Consider that the body holds static charge, because, you can get static-shocked. Consider that the body’s signals are electrical, even if they’re chemical-electrical/mechanical. Consider that there’s no such thing as a perfect insulator; enough voltage will overcome any resistance, and even if air is normally considered insulative, it’s still anyway a conductor. Yet, air can get ionized, and ionized air is regularly conductive. A final consideration before we tie all these things together- neurons are a type of voltage cell, among other things. You have five billion neurons with 1/3 volt potential each. If they’re all connected to each other, there’s an argument for a possible series, parallel, or series/parallel circuit arrangement, even if there’s usually resistance between each neuron cell. What if, whenever your body needs to react quickly, or is unusually stimulated, the resistance lowers between the cells, opening up a totaled electrical potential? You’d have a lightning bolt’s worth. Even without that much, you’d still have a lot, perhaps enough to power the type of effect I’m describing. So- it would be possible that, I propose: when you dissociate you are essentially boosting the output signal of the brain by fully focusing on thought. If you do it while you have a high heart rate / blood pressure, you’re further boosting the output signal, systemically, because the brain is pumped by your circulatory system. Also, high heart rate / blood pressure make you sweat, increasing your surface conductivity, and, high heart rate / blood pressure may generate a static electric charge on their own due to an internal triboelectric (friction) effect of pumping blood and clenching muscles; perhaps, once this charge is built, and with the skin’s increased conductivity, the air around the body starts to get ionized by the body, becoming conductive. Now, it would be possible to consider that image-information in the brain is circuited electrically to some region of air that is flourescing, fulfilling the hard drive/wires/monitor analogy, and forming the EVH product in the air as a sort of shaped and colored electrostatic ball-lightning, electrically induced by the brain and body. I wonder also if the iron content of the blood magnetizes at all while pumping, perhaps contributing a changing magnetic field to this system. Copyright Joshua Noble Kortekaas Savin 2023 All rights reserved
January 27, 2023 20:09:26
removelink:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Report of personal experiments and research findings: preliminary conclusionsGains in science are sometimes made by logic, when a new observation has an ultimately obvious explanation; this was not one of those cases. Leaps in science are sometimes made accidentally. I conducted two different experiments, by myself, using myself as guinea pig. I did these over the course of many years. One of the experiments had to do with the statistical frequency, geographical spread, and nature of UFO sightings. My thinking went: UFO sightings happened anywhere, happened regularly, and happened bizarrely- some of the behavior being “alien-like”, and some of the behavior being abstraction-like. UFOs were perhaps either aliens or perceptual error. If it was perceptual error, it belonged in the realm of psychology. Curious about what they were, and noting the frequency and spread of sightings, I wondered this: would anyone who determined themselves to go out UFO-watching, every single night, or even regularly, for years and years on end, be guaranteed eventually to see a UFO? Note that, in retrospect, this is similar to asking a question like: does going UFO-watching *cause* UFO-sightings? Try to hold that thought. My other experiment was at first unrelated, and was about a phenomenon that actually even less was known about: visual hallucination. Visual hallucination was so rare that it was essentially unstudied. I had some questions and wanted to be the first to break ground on the topic. I came up with an experiment that had two components to it: in part it would test whether visual hallucination could be induced in any person. In part it would test whether visual hallucination was actually a form of dreaming: a sort of accident where the brain starts dreaming somehow while the person is awake and has their eyes open. It was the only thing I could guess that visual hallucination was, since it didn’t make sense to me otherwise, mechanically. How could anyone see anything that wasn’t there, looking through transparent and unobstructed eyeballs just like everyone else has? This was primarily a sleep-deprivation experiment: I reasoned that perhaps with enough sleep-deprivation you could get your brain to start dreaming while you were awake. First I want to tell you about the UFO experiment, which I had begun in the 2000’s, years earlier than the hallucination experiment, and which I had already had some successes with. My first major success happened after several years of consistent, regular trying. There had been minor successes that I considered indeterminate- maybe a small UFO briefly/far away. Then, in 2010, I had a major sighting, of lots of UFOs, over several nights, some that looked like spheres, some that looked like aerial craft of some sort, and some that looked like large abstractions, up in the woods. Friends with me at the time saw some of it, too. I captured a little of it on video. No question it was whatever “UFOs” are. Up close, it gave me the impression that it was some bizarre phenomenon, and not aliens, and not perceptual error. The forms seemed life-like, but too nonsensical to be likely life-forms. It seemed to be something even more bizarre. I didn’t know what to make of it or how to report it; I didn’t bother at the time. I just kept my notes and video (I had managed to capture a bright light appearing and disappearing in the air on the last night) and kept thinking about it. A friend on this trip who saw a glowing sphere with me, up close, about forty feet away from us and about ten feet off the ground, maybe ten inches wide, that suddenly appeared in mid-air, and then disappeared when we ran toward it, kept saying the same thing about it afterward, that they remembered it and couldn’t explain it. That footage I later lost but I held onto the notes I had made of everything I had seen. Some years after this, in 2014, I started running my hallucination experiment. Sure enough, my bet was right on the money. As it turns out, if you stay awake long enough, you do force your brain to dream, “with your eyes open”, and this is visual hallucination; it places dream-images into your field of view, right alongside all the other things you’re seeing. Finally I had explained the mechanism. I was hoping to write a paper on this, for the field of psychology. I decided to first increase the experiment duration though, to try to get an even more dramatic result before I sat down to write. There would still be a question of whether-or-not this was what was going on in the brains of people who have visual hallucination but who are not sleep-deprived. My feeling was that this was going on anyway, but somehow was happening without sleep-deprivation in those people. Here, though, as I tried to increase the sleep-deprivation amount, to deepen the hallucination quality and have a little more to write about in my description, I got instead a shocking result- let me explain what I had been seeing so far in my experiment: something like a color spot that would appear in my vision, that had a sort of flat, 2-d look to it, and that I could tell was “in my eyes” or, mind, though it appeared superimposed in the environment, and that would sort of go in and out of looking image-like. What happened one night was that this same sort of color spot, with increased sleep deprivation, instead of expanding, lasting longer, or turning into a more specific form, turned 3-d looking, like it was actually there- not something in my eyes or mind but something in the room. I mean it went from looking like a hallucination, to looking like it was an actual, external, floating hologram, outside of myself, that I could pick up a camera and take a picture of. It was like a little semi-transparent floating orb. It lasted briefly like this and then it disappeared. Certain of my instincts, that I had seen what I thought I saw, I decided to continue this line of research as a project. I wanted to see whether I could make this effect happen again, and capture it on film this time. In the ensuing months and years, I developed a technique to increase the body’s chances of producing this effect, and, I found that I indeed was able to capture these effects, when they occurred, on film. You cannot capture a normal hallucination *on film*; if I was capturing these on film, they were externally visible. Soon I had gotten proof on video that these holograms were mind-produced, when in 2015 I was able to capture one that was of something that obviously was produced by my own subconscious: a representation of the backside of a car that I had been looking at earlier in the day (here is that footage: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kTUG021NEhU](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kTUG021NEhU). Only the glowing tail-lights of the “car” are visible in the footage because it was taken in the dark and the cell-phone camera over-compensated for the brightness of certain parts of the hologram and dimmed itself automatically; in person, a complete outline of a car was dimly visible around the tail-lights. It was like a glowing, semi-transparent, holographic model of a car, floating in air, absolutely still but sort of shifting over a couple of minutes and then disappearing, located right where the top of a bush was, a few feet away from me, and sort of covering the top of the bush. This hologram lasted a couple minutes and then started to disperse; I caught the tail end of this happening on video. The “car” was about three feet wide, four feet long, and about three feet above the ground; here is a video taken of the exact same spot during the daytime, with a spin-around so you can see the area: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xo4N\_TgX4M4](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xo4N_TgX4M4). You can see that this was on a small hill with a wall behind it; there’s nothing that could have been reflecting and there’s no way a real car could have been parked in that same spot. This footage is not very clear but I invite anyone to analyze it). It’s difficult to catch these on film because they happen at random times, all of a sudden, and don’t last long. After years of doing this, though, I had observed hundreds of different productions of this effect, many of which were extremely impressive. I compared these all to the entire history of UFO sightings: I found that the catalog of different examples I had made of this effect matched the UFO record, which seemed as well to be divisible into spheres, indistinct forms, and distinct forms, whose shapes and behaviors further matched mine. I found that the spheres were the easiest to do, indistinct forms were a little harder to do and were something of a progression beyond the sphere shape which apparently was the basic form of this, and that, at “max power” of the effect, and most rare and difficult to do, were full-forms, where it looked like a complete, real object, rather than just a sphere or some weird shape. I found that this matched the UFO canon exactly: the UFO record can be divided into incidences of mostly spheres, followed by incidences of “weird shapes”, and most rarely, what are apparently fully-formed images. What I realized was that the technique that I had devised, wherein a person could increase their chances dramatically of producing one of these, was somehow happening anyway, rarely yet regularly, in the normal population. I worked to identify specifically which factors of momentary behavior can cause the “launch” of these effects in a “normal-conditions” person, meaning a person who is not intentionally trying to do one of these, but who accidentally does one. There are several factors I found that individually or together can increase the chances of someone doing one of these or that can cause one of these. In general I term this type of effect “**external**” **hallucination** (as I later found, this is a class of effects, of different types, that I have further termed. The effect currently being discussed, which pertains to all “UFOs”, and some other things, I have termed specifically “**external visual hallucination**”, as it is in effect, visual hallucination, *externally*). Here are the **factors** that pertain somewhat to all external hallucinations and specifically to external visual hallucination, and discussions of how they are found in the regular population: First of all, if the extremely rare effect of external hallucination occurs, it tends to happen **when** or after **a person** **mentally dissociates**, for a relatively long time, often **while** happening to have a **high heart rate and/or blood pressure**. There are mechanical reasons for this which I will discuss later on. “Dissociate” is a term I have had to borrow and modify somewhat for my own purposes. I am using the word as follows: when someone’s thoughts absorb their own attention fully, such that, even though they have their eyes open and are even perhaps performing tasks, they actually have gone momentarily blind to their own sensories, such that, they aren’t really seeing what’s happening, they’re losing track of time, and when they “return” from this state, they won’t have a memory of what they saw while they were thinking or of how long they were thinking for. This can happen quickly or this can go on for a long time. The truth is, everyone actually dissociates every time they think at all. It’s just that it usually happens for so short a time that it doesn’t interfere with anyone’s normal flow of tasks or cause accidents. Usually it’s happening for split seconds, or at most a few seconds. Now, while this is happening, the person also has to be having an unusually high heart rate and blood pressure. Basically when you combine high heart rate/blood pressure with mental dissociation, you are in a configuration for possibly launching an external hallucination, but not guaranteed to do so, it is still a rare chance. Further, there are similar trends that go with and increase the chances if combined, or that can sometimes stand alone to cause these: **Sleep deprivation**\- sleep deprivation goes hand-in-hand with a technique that requires high heart rate and mental dissociation, because, sleep deprivation does both of these things to you- on one hand, sleep deprivation increases, not decreases, your heart rate / blood pressure, because, your body has to work harder to overcome the fatigue of muscles. If you’re sleep deprived, you will notice that your heart is pumping faster than usual, while you’re being active, as part of keeping you awake and moving. Second, sleep deprivation shortens, dramatically, your short-term memory, because basically your brain is tired. Shortening your short-term memory increases your tendency to dissociate, because you forget what’s going on faster and it increases your propensity to “tune out” and be lost in thought momentarily. Most people are vaguely familiar with “difficulty concentrating” while tired. Without intentionally trying to sleep-deprive oneself, many people regularly get sleep-deprived anyway for various reasons and still show up for work the next day anyway. Someone who’s just had a baby, for instance, is likely to be sleep-deprived for the first couple of years. Someone who is simply stressed, excited, depressed, thoughtful, uncomfortable, or bothered, like by loud noise outside, or like by bed bugs, during the night, can get sleep-deprived. Some people suffer from insomnia which they consider otherwise cause-less. Some people lose sleep from simply having too much work to do and doing it, staying up all night. Some people stay up all night partying, drinking, having sex, and then go in to work the next day without having actually slept. Any sleep-deprivation is one way I’ve found of increasing the chances of accidentally externally hallucinating. The incidence of sleep-deprivation in the regular population is high enough, upon consideration, to be a factor. The following **emotions** can be said to increase the chances of external hallucination, because, they do the same thing: **excitement, wonder, fear**. Each of these, or combinations, for any reason, will increase heart rate / blood pressure and will increase your dissociation tendency. These can happen to any person at any time, but, for some more often or with more guarantee than for others, for example, anyone undergoing military training exercises. This is one of the reasons why external hallucination incidents are found to happen more often on military bases / ranges than elsewhere; it’s actually because they’re doing exciting and death-defying things on a regular basis, and how those emotions play into the configuring of a person’s body to be in the external-hallucination mode. Also true in warzones. In general, **extreme physical activity**, exertion, exhaustion, and **variations of exhaustion** like dehydration, hunger/fasting, and muscle fatigue can increase the chance. Activity increases heart rate & blood pressure, exhaustion increases dissociation. When fighter pilots pull high G’s, their incidence is likely raised by blood-pressure spiking. **Belief** can also be said to be a factor on its own as I’ve found, meaning, if you are confident that you will see a **certain thing**, or very curious about seeing a certain thing, this actually helps do it, or can on its own in some cases be enough to do it, especially if many hours are spent trying. What you think you’ll see, or wonder if you’ll see, consciously affects what your subconscious will project. Here is a discussion on the effects of **pharmaceuticals/drugs**, various, on external hallucination chances. Understand, there are two different hallucination effects: “internal” (regular type) and external, but only one hallucination ability; so, you cannot, at one time, do both at kinds at once, though you can rapidly go from doing one kind to doing the other. The two effects work a little differently and have different causes. So, in general, things that increase the chance of internal hallucination decrease the chance of external hallucination. Hallucinogens, believe-it-or-not, decrease your ability to externally hallucinate, because they make you internally hallucinate. Anything that’s a sedative decreases your ability to externally hallucinate, and may-or-may-not increase your ability to internally hallucinate. Anything that is any kind of stimulant increases your chances of external hallucination. There are some drugs that can be said to make you woozy or drowzy or spaced out, but are not quite sedatives, that may increase your ability to dissociate, and that may work by simultaneously increasing your heart rate while relaxing your muscles, or other ways- if it increases your ability to dissociate it can help with external hallucination. Anything that dilates your pupils will help with internal hallucination, but won’t help with external unless combined with a high heart rate. Also, **repeated scanning of the sky** has a propensity to aid EVH, especially over many hours. This is something that anyone in the front seat of an aircraft is likely to be doing, hence their increased effect-successes. It can be similar for people on boats, or, in front of sensor-equipment bays/monitors. Looking through the historical data, it seems that just looking through a monitor of some kind can be enough to launch an EVH in the vicinity, outside of the “visual range” of the person, yet arguably “within” their visual range if you consider that the monitor image, tied to real-world data, is a type of real-world extension of their eyesight. This issue bears some further discussion, but, for now, consider it a possibility. Here’s a very important point to make- when external hallucination happens, it **gives no feel** at all to the effecting person, no internal indication that lets them know that it happened. If it doesn’t happen at the center of your vision, you have to otherwise notice that it’s happened and know enough to understand what it is and be able to diagnose who “launched” it, whether it was probably you or someone else nearby, based on who was most likely to have, using the info above. Without knowing all this, if you did one, you would have no idea that you had done it. You would just assume it was something else. This is why this phenomenon has gone on so long, historically, without anyone figuring out what it really is. I only figured this out by the accidents of my story first of all, and then by finding ways of increasing the effect to produce it intentionally, and then by studying it a lot. So, if you make one, you won’t feel anything different at all happen in your brain; you’ll have no way of knowing if you’ve just made one, unless it appears at the center of your vision. If it appears anywhere outside the center of your vision, you’ll just have to look around and notice whether or not one of these things is floating around near you. **External Visual Hallucination Atmospheric Holograms** **Definition**: EVH is an extremely rare, and difficult-to-produce phenomenon, which can nonetheless happen to anyone under the right conditions, and which regularly happens accidentally, wherein: a person’s brain, sensories, and body stimulate the atmosphere into producing a type of hologram, ranging from base-form spheres to other shapes, determined by the person’s subconscious. These are visible to the person, and to other people, and to sensors. They may reflect or emit various waveforms, or do so at times. These are able to be captured in photographs and on video, including in infrared. EH effects can also interfere with electronics or instruments. **Range**: EVH will appear, and then disappear, anywhere within the visual range of the person producing them, and will be visible to that person and any other persons or sensor equipment also within visual or sensor range of the EVH atmospheric hologram (EVH-AH) produced. Consider that, if someone goes outside and looks up, the range and altitude of spots they can focus their eyes on is many miles, and, at night, even further. In general EVH can happen anywhere from inches in front of a person’s face to miles away in the atmosphere, and can scale in size accordingly, from a few inches wide if right in front of you, to a few feet wide starting about ten feet away from you, to tens or even hundreds of feet wide at maximum if far away. EVH-AH seem to be able to form behind or to the side of a person also, outside their direct visual path at the moment but within their visual “range” if they turn their head. **Duration**: EVH-AHs can last anywhere from a few seconds to a few hours, but most last under a minute; many last only a few seconds. **Shapes**: There are three important categories for visual identification of EVH by shape: **Spheres**\- These are the base effect of EVH. They can appear as singles or multiples, are relatively small-sized, and will either glow yellow, amber, or orange, or they will reflect opaque white or silvery. They also can sometimes show up in infrared-only, in which case they will be invisible to the naked eye but viewable on an infrared or a regular digital camera, which are somewhat infrared-sensitive. **Indistinct/**“**Geometric**”- Anything that isn’t a perfect sphere, and isn’t a specific recognizable form either. Any plain shapes, or strange, or hybrid-looking shapes fall into this category. Things that have outline and shading but not distinct features, or that have nonsensical hybrid features. More rare than spheres and the second relative level of the effect. The designs of these are actually subconscious abstractions of, or composites of, plain shapes and regular, every-day objects and sights that the effecting person has seen- a sort of accident of the subconscious. Sometimes these will flash, mimicking airplane lights, even moving similarly (spheres may likewise be an abstraction of the sun or reflections of the sun, stars, headlights, streetlamps and so forth, that you see peripherally/subconsciously throughout your day). **Distinct**\- Any fully-formed image of any kind qualifies as the rarest category of EVH. Mostly EVH comes in its base form of spheres or in the step above that where the subconscious has started making a sort of image but only gone so far. At max, EVH can be a fully-formed image of some kind that has a complete set of thematic discerning details that stay stable while it’s visible. The give-away for distinguishing them is that they’re nonsensical, something that shouldn’t exist or shouldn’t be floating in the sky, also, that they appear out of nowhere and then disappear into nowhere after seconds to minutes. A building floating in the sky, a giant fish going across the sky, a cartoon character going across the sky, a flying saucer hovering. “Ghost photos” also fall into this category. In the rare instances like this, you are seeing the maximum level of the effect of EVH. **Motions**\- Spheres, which are the base effect of EVH, will exhibit very clearly at times, three of six different peculiarities of motion that EVH are capable of: 1. Sitting perfectly **still** at a spot in the air, even with wind blowing. 2. **Hovering** around at a spot in the air, as if wind were blowing, without wind blowing. 3. Taking off, or abruptly changing course, going **nonsensical speeds**, about as fast as you can move your own center of vision across the horizon. 4. The “distinct” class can actually display **motion consistent with** the **theme** of the image. 5. The “indistinct” class will usually do either a sort of slow and steady **float**, like a cloud, or: 6. It will do any type of nonsensical, **bizarre** movement (and/or semi-thematical motions, for half-formed images). Note though that any of the types can do any of these motion patterns. **How to classify and report on events**: Observers should try to get footage; people should make sure to keep at least a cell-phone camera with them. Observers should classify EVH events by their shape: sphere-type, indistinct-type, or distinct-type, then, specifically describe the appearance and behavior, and note the duration. Observers should then indicate whether or not, as far as they know, they were the first person in the area who noticed the AH, and, if they were the closest person in the area to it. If someone else saw it first and pointed it out to them, they should indicate that, and who that person was, and that person’s report should also be collected. Everyone in an area where an EVH-AH happened should be interviewed for any effects they may have noticed. If an observer believes that they were the first who noticed it and/or were the person closest to it, then, they may have been the one who effected it, and so: they should then go on additionally to note: everything they can remember about what their mental, emotional, and physical states were like and what they were thinking and doing at the following times: when the event started, just before the event started, during and throughout the event, several hours leading up to the event, and, some general notes in kind about the time frame of several days leading up to the event. They should be asked how much sleep they got on each of the nights before the event. They should be asked if they were on any medications, stimulants, sedatives, or substances of any kind, and how much and how often on that day and the other days. Finally they should be asked how many EVH events they have seen in the past or perhaps done, and what types they were. No one should have any concern about reporting these or about doing these, even multiple times. EVH are normally harmless and can happen to anyone, even to someone who is fully sober and unperturbed, and even to someone who is competently doing their job. Collecting more data will help to verify and to study these further. It is likely that EVH-AH events are under-reported. **National Security Risk**\- The foremost national security risk that these pose has to do with them being misidentified as plausible, or even as implausible, real-world threats. EVH-AH are subconsciously mind-controlled, albeit, as such, with a sort of lag and latency. The problem with thinking that they are “a real, hostile, alien spacecraft”, or a “real, experimental technology of a hostile foreign nation” is that doing so can modify the behavior of the AH to act more like one of those things, causing the AH to “turn on you” and start chasing the person producing it. A pilot who unknowingly produces, and sees, an EVH-AH, that they think is a hostile UFO, that then turns on them and starts chasing them like it’s a hostile UFO, is at risk of reacting accordingly and stalling and crashing their plane or running out of fuel and having to bail out while trying to out-maneuver it, or, inappropriately discharging their weapons at it. An operator at the terminal of an early-warning radar station is at risk of seeing an EVH-AH on their scopes and thinking it’s an incoming ICBM or ICBMs. It seems EVH-AHs are able to be picked up or locked onto by sensor equipment. A person confronting one should be confident that the EVH-AH will behave harmlessly toward them. Even distinct-type EVH-AHs imperfectly mimic real-world objects; they are easily discernible and they noticeably appear and disappear. People who are assigned to monitor real risks like those (incoming warheads in sovereign airspace, or, hostile foreign aircraft in sovereign airspace) should keep a short-list handy in their minds of the real-world behaviors of the objects they’re supposed to track, for instantly analyzing whether a blip is likely to be the real thing or is possibly an EVH-AH. For example, real ICBMs should only come from certain directions, i.e. the nations that possess them and would fire them, along certain paths, at certain speeds, and in certain numbers. Operators should be trained not to panic at anything that doesn’t have all of the attributes that it should have if it were the real thing. Similarly, for aircraft, a blip moving nonsensically may be an EVH-AH rather than novel and hostile foreign aviation technology. It should remain a policy to scramble jets to visually approach and confirm unidentifieds. Everyone who works in such jobs in the military should be told what EVH is. Briefing everyone on what these are will mitigate the risks associated with them, because, at outset the subconscious production of these things is emotionally “neutral”, meaning, they basically don’t do anything other than float around for a few minutes and then disappear, if you understand what they are and therefore react to them emotionally “neutrally”. Make sure to look for the give-away of appearance and disappearance, on sensor scopes or visibly (some ufologists used to think that this was evidence of alien crafts teleporting in and out, or using invisibility camouflage, or travelling to Earth at light speed and stopping on a dime, then taking off again at light speed from a standstill). **How it works**\- It may turn out that external visual hallucination atmospheric holograms are actually something other than a type of hologram. I will discuss that. If they are what can be called a type of hologram, they probably work like this: the basic principle of **holography** is beam-splitting and self-interfering. Here is an extremely simplified analogy for those unfamiliar: You take a light beam. You look up close at it. You can see little wave lines going across it, where the actual light waves are. Now you take that whole beam and you split it into two beams, and you send them in different directions. Then, you take them and bring them back together, so that they’re crossing through each other somewhere. You look closely at that area where they’re crossing. Now, where all the little light waves from each of the two beams have crossed each other, there’s an “interference-pattern” where the waves have criss-crossed. What’s special about that interference pattern is that it’s actually a type of readable measurement of how far those two beams travelled away from each other and at what angles. In other words, you have a type of three-dimensional description of what the rest of the system of beams is doing. Now, if you reflect one of the two beams off of an object before the beams cross, you get a three-dimensional description of that object and its location in space, too, along with the rest of the beam info, at the interference pattern. This is not the finished hologram in a holography setup, but, this is how the holographic information is transmitted. In a holography setup, the final step of making the hologram product is to use a piece of special film that can develop interference patterns, and you shine the interference pattern onto that film and develop it; you’re left with a “hologram”. Keep in mind the part about interference patterns and how the information is transmitted. Now I’m going to show you how I found that the human body might actually utilize holographic principles, which is something that has never been looked for in anatomy. Here’s a short example: Shoot a light beam at the skull. Where the skull has two eyes, that beam will be split into two beams, going into the skull. Behind the eyeballs, that split beam crosses, in the optic chiasm, a piece of the body most people aren’t familiar with that sits between the eyes and the brain and is in the shape of an X. From there it goes into each side of the brain, where, as you know, you interpret these images three-dimensionally, and, you store them and are able to reproduce them, also in 3-d. The brain qualifies therefore as some type of holographic film. The eyes, optic chiasm, and brain may qualify as a beam-splitter, interference-pattern generator, and holographic film. Holography is done with coherent laser light, but perhaps incoming visible light is cohered or “straightened” within the eyeball, which can be said to have four back-to-back lensing layers when you consider the cornea, the aqueous humor, and the vitreous humor in addition to the lens. Or maybe incoming light is amplified anywhere in the eyes/optic chiasm/brain system, or amplified and resonated, making it coherent somewhere internally. If the optic chiasm’s wires actually cross through each other at all, it’s possible that an interference pattern is generated there for both sides. If it turns out that the optic chiasm has no holographic properties, and is as already described in anatomy as basically just two overlapping wires that do not interact, then the holographic process might be happening entirely in the brain, via the link between the two hemispheres: light from each eye shines into its corresponding brain hemisphere, where each side is also able to shine through into the other hemisphere through the linkage between them, thus interfering in both sides, to put it all simplistically. If the light gets converted to electronic signals or chemical-electric signals in the brain you could look for a corresponding type of interference. If something like that is happening, here is how the whole thing can possibly work in reverse, to “develop the air” into a hologram. First of all, appreciate that, when the brain receives information, it’s inputting, but when it replays that information, when it thinks, dreams, hallucinates, it’s essentially outputting that information. Second, appreciate that when you dream, the scenery is often lit to the level of full daylight. Somewhere within the system of your brain, optic chiasm, and eyes, light is being produced, visible within your eyeballs. If your eyes would be open when this would happen, they could be emitting some light, even if a small or reflected amount. Consider the “red eye” effect of pupils in photographs- it’s assumed to be reflected light, but could the pupils be emitting light at all? What about infrared light? What if correlate interference patterns from both sides of your brain are re-emitted back out through the optic chiasm, emitted out the eyeballs in a split-beam configuration, and then converged on a single spot in the air where you are focusing your eyes? If it is a minute amount of interfered-light output, what if it’s a repeating signal, and the atmosphere is actually pumped by this until a hologram is achieved at a certain spot, much like how a laser’s medium is pumped, either electrically or photonically? If the retina is a type of photocell sensor, that takes in light at its front end and gives you electricity at its back end, consider this analogy: a microphone is another type of sensor, that takes in sound at the front end and gives you electricity at its back end. Reversed, it works as a speaker; if you give it electricity at its back end, it’ll put out sound from its front end. Might it be that the retina works the same way? Also, has anyone ever checked whether a retina takes in light at its front and puts out light at its back? It may be that a retina is more like a fiber-optic harness, or like some photosensor that inputs and outputs light. Do you know how, when you close your eyes, there’s sort of a faint, static-like, color-glow to look at, just barely? This may be a “reverse-ouput” from your brain, that turns brighter and focuses output images when dreaming. Perhaps what you’re actually seeing is the front side of your retina, reflecting off the inside of your lens, allowing the image to seem superimposed and focused in front of you. All these are just some guesses I have about how external visual hallucination would work, holographically, if the product of external visual hallucination is indeed a hologram. Know that no one has otherwise figured out how to produce a “free-standing hologram” that projects into air, or, a “360-degree hologram” that you can look at from all sides, or an opaque hologram, nor are there terms to distinguish such things. Nonetheless, this may be how it’s done; the product EVH-“object” *seems* to be holographical. If EVH products are better described as purely “**electrical**”, or, “static-electrical”, here is my guess as to what the analogy would be: first, consider this common system: a computer hard drive, wires, and a monitor: image-information stored on the hard drive, is connected electrically through the wires, to the monitor which can display the information. In our case, the air would have to be the monitor, but how would that be? And what would the wires be? Obviously, the brain would be the hard drive. Consider these: air is flouresce-able, if an especial current or discharge is run through it. Air will light up. Most people don’t realize that when they see lightning, they’re not “seeing electricity”; electricity is, at all times and in any amounts, completely invisible. What they’re seeing is the air flourescing from how much voltage is being run through it. Also though they’re observing how much static electricity builds up in the atmosphere. If there’s that much sometimes, how much is there other times? Perhaps enough to play with. Consider also that air rainbows; it prisms, and it can glow the different plasma colors. There would be a way, essentially, to use the air as a “monitor”. Now, what would the “wires” be? Consider that the body is completely conductive; that’s why we can get electrocuted. Consider that the outside of the body regularly becomes even more conductive via sweating. Consider that the body holds static charge, because, you can get static-shocked. Consider that the body’s signals are electrical, even if they’re chemical-electrical/mechanical. Consider that there’s no such thing as a perfect insulator; enough voltage will overcome any resistance, and even if air is normally considered insulative, it’s still anyway a conductor. Yet, air can get ionized, and ionized air is regularly conductive. A final consideration before we tie all these things together- neurons are a type of voltage cell, among other things. You have five billion neurons with 1/3 volt potential each. If they’re all connected to each other, there’s an argument for a possible series, parallel, or series/parallel circuit arrangement, even if there’s usually resistance between each neuron cell. What if, whenever your body needs to react quickly, or is unusually stimulated, the resistance lowers between the cells, opening up a totaled electrical potential? You’d have a lightning bolt’s worth. Even without that much, you’d still have a lot, perhaps enough to power the type of effect I’m describing. So- it would be possible that, I propose: when you dissociate you are essentially boosting the output signal of the brain by fully focusing on thought. If you do it while you have a high heart rate / blood pressure, you’re further boosting the output signal, systemically, because the brain is pumped by your circulatory system. Also, high heart rate / blood pressure make you sweat, increasing your surface conductivity, and, high heart rate / blood pressure may generate a static electric charge on their own due to an internal triboelectric (friction) effect of pumping blood and clenching muscles; perhaps, once this charge is built, and with the skin’s increased conductivity, the air around the body starts to get ionized by the body, becoming conductive. Now, it would be possible to consider that image-information in the brain is circuited electrically to some region of air that is flourescing, fulfilling the hard drive/wires/monitor analogy, and forming the EVH product in the air as a sort of shaped and colored electrostatic ball-lightning, electrically induced by the brain and body. I wonder also if the iron content of the blood magnetizes at all while pumping, perhaps contributing a changing magnetic field to this system. Copyright Joshua Noble Kortekaas Savin 2023 All rights reserved
January 27, 2023 19:49:02
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
This isn't a bad idea, but the current barriers are too significant it seems. The initial issue is the quality and frequency of the data (i.e. individual sightings to evaluate). We have [guidelines for sighting posts](https://ufos.wiki/track/sightings-post-guidelines/), but many which get posted still lack sufficient context or content justifying further investigation. One solution we've developed (as of a couple weeks ago) is the creation of a new sighting post 'type' called Reports. Sighting posts can now be flaired as 'Report' and will have to [follow a specific template](https://ufos.wiki/reports/) which should create some consistency and additional context for those sightings. Unfortunately, it takes a few steps to use the template and the vast majority of users still do not seem inclined to use it. Ideally, we can develop ways to make it easier over time and more people will contribute. If they don't, I don't think we'll have a formalized enough system to garner enough sightings worth reviewing. The other issue would be finding the individuals necessary to engage in some form of peer review. This isn't something moderators can contribute to necessarily, as we're already tasked with moderation itself and this takes up a significant amount of our time and energy. Historically, an overwhelming majority of users also do not participate or contribute in the form of voting, to projects such as the [UFOS WIKI](https://ufos.wiki/track/wiki/), or moderation itself. Some of this is just due to the nature of the platform and state of online media consumption. We'll continue to advertise ways to contribute to try to maximize them, but my impression currently is that there isn't a substantial group of educated volunteers simply waiting to wander in the door to be part of such a group. I think it will take a large amount of incremental steps, improvements, and shifts in the community in general to facilitate something which could produce the quality of reports and individuals wiling to volunteer reviewing them at a rigorous level on a regular basis.
January 27, 2023 19:24:46
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Sorry, I'm really not a fan of social media, my sister is the one who suggested I make a TikTok account and post it there because she thought it would be the place where the most people could see it. Also that bee guy left a comment for me to follow him (edit:guess reddit didn't like my link) It was his dm that brought me here. And oof, I've been called a lot of things but "your face look like an AI image" is a new one lol.
January 27, 2023 06:36:32
editsettings:
upload_image headerimg (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
January 27, 2023 06:36:20
community_styling:
added_styling secondary banner positioned image, banner positioned image, banner positioned image position, banner background image, banner background image position, banner background color, banner height, mobile banner image (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
January 27, 2023 06:32:52
submit_scheduled_post:
scheduled for Fri, 27 Jan 2023 05:32 AM CST (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
r/UFOs Collaborative Youtube PlaylistHey everyone, We’d like to experiment with a collaborative Youtube playlist. It will contain videos added by the community which you think are relevant to ufology. If you’re reading this, you’re welcome to add to it right now by going to link below and selecting ‘Continue’. It will then appear as an option whenever you’re viewing a video on Youtube and click the ‘Save’ option. Let us know your thoughts on this idea and any suggestions you might have in the comments below. *Disclaimer: adding content to this playlist will attach your YouTube account name to the videos you add. If this is a concern for you, simply suggest the content in the comments below.* # [Add to the playlist](https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLdemXDhd4FBMv0TVQvq_ffTjdoKdyQ8hx&jct=L82hfnO8YEE5EL6NxSfk8ZaqZTxt-g)
January 27, 2023 06:32:52
sticky:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
r/UFOs Collaborative Youtube PlaylistHey everyone, We’d like to experiment with a collaborative Youtube playlist. It will contain videos added by the community which you think are relevant to ufology. If you’re reading this, you’re welcome to add to it right now by going to link below and selecting ‘Continue’. It will then appear as an option whenever you’re viewing a video on Youtube and click the ‘Save’ option. Let us know your thoughts on this idea and any suggestions you might have in the comments below. *Disclaimer: adding content to this playlist will attach your YouTube account name to the videos you add. If this is a concern for you, simply suggest the content in the comments below.* # [Add to the playlist](https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLdemXDhd4FBMv0TVQvq_ffTjdoKdyQ8hx&jct=L82hfnO8YEE5EL6NxSfk8ZaqZTxt-g)
January 27, 2023 06:32:52
unsticky:
replaced (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
UAP Report is here
January 26, 2023 04:41:35
create_scheduled_post:
"r/UFOs Collaborative Youtube Playlist" scheduled for Fri, 27 Jan 2023 09:00 AM CST (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
January 25, 2023 20:15:15
sticky:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, smudgepost. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10kib3d/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 11: Posts similar to previous [Common Question posts](https://www.reddit.com/r/ufos/wiki/commonquestions) must include a link to the previous thread. Our aim is to consolidate existing responses and discourage redundant posts from users who have not viewed previous threads. Users may suggest future questions to ask (or re-ask) in series at any time [using this link](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2Fufos&subject=Common%20Question%20Suggestion). Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 25, 2023 20:15:15
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, smudgepost. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10kib3d/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 11: Posts similar to previous [Common Question posts](https://www.reddit.com/r/ufos/wiki/commonquestions) must include a link to the previous thread. Our aim is to consolidate existing responses and discourage redundant posts from users who have not viewed previous threads. Users may suggest future questions to ask (or re-ask) in series at any time [using this link](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2Fufos&subject=Common%20Question%20Suggestion). Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 25, 2023 20:15:15
editflair:
flair_edit (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Best online sources for reliable info?Greetings all, I've lately been using YouTube for more info and find new organisations I've not heard of before like the old and expired "Too The Stars" with mixed representation complete with information/disinformation, then there's MUFON. What other sites or even YouTube channels provide information you find interesting or trust?
January 25, 2023 20:15:08
removelink:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Best online sources for reliable info?Greetings all, I've lately been using YouTube for more info and find new organisations I've not heard of before like the old and expired "Too The Stars" with mixed representation complete with information/disinformation, then there's MUFON. What other sites or even YouTube channels provide information you find interesting or trust?
January 25, 2023 19:19:15
editflair:
flair_edit (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Picket Post AZ UFO Sighting
January 24, 2023 22:39:43
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
> Why not add your opinion to the comment thread. Weird that you'd ask that when I just answered you: > There's only so much constructive conversation you can have with people out to remove people like you. The mods here like to say there's a huge variety of viewpoints among them, but that's not terribly obvious on the meta sub, where it sure seems far more hostile to skepticism. So, I don't imagine why you *think* I'd want to enter that conversation or continue this one with you any further.
January 24, 2023 22:37:02
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Over in [the meta sub](https://www.reddit.com/r/ufosmeta/comments/10k7yxb/tired_of_the_overwhelming_negativity_and_denial/) some mods are talking about about how they should ban anyone who *denies* UFOs (in that slippery motte-and-bailey sense of "UFOs") and how *honest* skeptics come to accept UFOs into their hearts. Nothing's changed on that front since I stopped being a believer.
January 24, 2023 17:23:31
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
They are actively taking the piss out of us. Seriously, all that waffle for one shitty pic? Spare me. Corbell? More like Cockbell. Fuck all these people who claim to be in the “know”.
January 24, 2023 17:23:30
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
They are actively taking the piss out of us. Seriously, all that waffle for one shitty pic? Spare me. Corbell? More like Cockbell. Fuck all these people who claim to be in the “know”.
January 24, 2023 17:23:14
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Can tell this one is legit purely by the sheer volume of lame ass bot replies in this thread. Mods should be having a field day on low effort comments here.
January 24, 2023 17:23:13
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Can tell this one is legit purely by the sheer volume of lame ass bot replies in this thread. Mods should be having a field day on low effort comments here.
January 24, 2023 13:47:42
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
I'm not aware of a way to do it, based on my searches. As in, I've seen no examples of a link which auto-selects flair on desktop. I'd just assume it wouldn't work for various apps on mobile. In terms of the forms method, Make.io already has integrations for making Reddit posts from a Gravity Form submission. I'm just waiting for them to fix making text posts (I'm working with their support). The link posts work already.
January 23, 2023 22:15:42
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
There isn't, unfortunately. I agree it would be easier if that were possible. Although, the specific flair for posts through this link will be 'Report', since we're looking to require the use of the template. Another option I've been pursuing is a web-based for on the page users can fill out and a bot will post it for them. There are some technical hurdles to building that though, which we're still working on.
January 23, 2023 20:06:41
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
We're experimenting depreciating those threads, based on how little they've been used and the decreasing rate of comments in them. We'd also prefer to use that sticky spot at the moment for this post to try and better explain the options and inform users about the new 'Report' posts.
January 23, 2023 12:43:46
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
**Need to dig into this for more information. Remember the original gimbal/gofast videos were disregarded and then turned out to be real leaks.**
January 23, 2023 12:43:42
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, loop-1138. Thanks for contributing. However, your [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10iyp0v/-/j5jbv3g/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 1: Follow the Standards of Civility > * No trolling or being disruptive. > * No insults or personal attacks. > * No accusations that other users are shills. > * No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation. > * No harassment, threats, or advocating violence. > * No witch hunts or doxxing. (Please redact usernames when possible) > * You may attack each other's ideas, not each other. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 23, 2023 12:43:40
removecomment:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Bot accounts are here in full force. Do they pay you by post or bulk price? 😂
January 23, 2023 12:43:35
sticky:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, sbleeding_79. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10jbfwh/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 9: Link posts must include a submission statement. > Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post). Submission statements may contain a summary or description of the content, why it is relevant to UFOs, the submitter's personal perspectives, or all of the above and must be at least 150 characters in length. If a statement is not added within thirty minutes of posting it will be removed. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 23, 2023 12:43:35
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, sbleeding_79. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10jbfwh/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 9: Link posts must include a submission statement. > Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post). Submission statements may contain a summary or description of the content, why it is relevant to UFOs, the submitter's personal perspectives, or all of the above and must be at least 150 characters in length. If a statement is not added within thirty minutes of posting it will be removed. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 23, 2023 12:43:35
editflair:
flair_edit (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
2 red lights /ufo / uaps
January 23, 2023 12:43:31
removelink:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
2 red lights /ufo / uaps
January 23, 2023 12:43:22
sticky:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, sbleeding_79. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10jbf60/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 9: Link posts must include a submission statement. > Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post). Submission statements may contain a summary or description of the content, why it is relevant to UFOs, the submitter's personal perspectives, or all of the above and must be at least 150 characters in length. If a statement is not added within thirty minutes of posting it will be removed. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 23, 2023 12:43:22
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, sbleeding_79. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10jbf60/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 9: Link posts must include a submission statement. > Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post). Submission statements may contain a summary or description of the content, why it is relevant to UFOs, the submitter's personal perspectives, or all of the above and must be at least 150 characters in length. If a statement is not added within thirty minutes of posting it will be removed. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 23, 2023 12:43:22
editflair:
flair_edit (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
ufo /uap footage/red lights
January 23, 2023 12:43:20
removelink:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
ufo /uap footage/red lights
January 23, 2023 12:43:11
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, loop-1138. Thanks for contributing. However, your [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10iyp0v/-/j5jcwfc/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 1: Follow the Standards of Civility > * No trolling or being disruptive. > * No insults or personal attacks. > * No accusations that other users are shills. > * No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation. > * No harassment, threats, or advocating violence. > * No witch hunts or doxxing. (Please redact usernames when possible) > * You may attack each other's ideas, not each other. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 23, 2023 12:43:07
removecomment:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Bot or paid account to hype up dumb shit. Is there really any difference?
January 23, 2023 12:42:39
wikirevise:
Page usernotes edited "create new note on new user loop-1138" via toolbox (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
January 23, 2023 12:42:24
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Have you ever been in a fighter airplane? Are your friends fighter pilots? Can you tell from this video what airplane it is? 😃
January 23, 2023 12:42:24
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Have you ever been in a fighter airplane? Are your friends fighter pilots? Can you tell from this video what airplane it is? 😃
January 23, 2023 12:42:01
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Maybe a soft disclosure with fake alien that didn’t pan out? It’s weird to have this as an event at the Olympics. If you also notice the “being” has 6 fingers which is described by some abductees. This is weird lol
January 23, 2023 12:41:54
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
I thought those candle lanterns were illegal
January 23, 2023 12:41:38
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
The AAWSAP / AATIP Shell Game: understanding the mechanisms at play within The Blackvault's timeline.I thought I would present a few graphics to assist everyone to understand just what exactly has gone on with AATIP / AAWSAP over the timeline that **John Greenewald (**u/blackvault**)** has produced: [https://www.theblackvault.com/documentarchive/the-black-vaults-aawsap-aatip-and-post-2017-ufo-timeline-project/](https://www.theblackvault.com/documentarchive/the-black-vaults-aawsap-aatip-and-post-2017-ufo-timeline-project/) As the funding for these program(s) dried up, they were simply moved to other sections of government. “*But why did they dry up, Harry*?” I hear you ask. Well, I’ve also included a few facts to connect the dots amongst the players that may give an insight as to why this occurred, and things that are still in play today. First of all, one has to understand the long-running resentment / hatred between the Central Intelligence Agency and the U.S. Military and later the National Security Agency since the C.I.A.’s inception in 1947. I won’t go over it here, but this webpage goes into great detail over some of the larger problems: [https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/cyber-vault-intelligence/2015-03-20/cia-and-signals-intelligence](https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/cyber-vault-intelligence/2015-03-20/cia-and-signals-intelligence) The Director of Central Intelligence (DCI) controlled most if not all the UFO/UAP data up until the creation of the Director of National Intelligence position in 2004, due to the intelligence failures of 9/11. With that out of the way, let’s consider some of the other key Government positions regarding the UFO/UAP topic: **The Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency** ​ ![img](xy9tx9q17jda1) USAF General **James Clapper** is well known; as we will see, he has a key role in the “shell game” of moving AATIP/ AAWSAP around. Vice Admiral **Thomas Wilson** is also well-known in the UFO/UAP community – mainly because he was denied access to Waivered, Unacknowledged Special Access Programs regarding crash retrieval reverse engineering. LT. GEN **Ron Burgess** may not be that well known; an Evangelical Christian that was a major part of Donald Trumps’ Presidential Election campaign. He may have been the main driver of **the decision to defund AATIP / AAWSAP in 2009; the DIA money budgeted for the program, therefore, runs out in 2012.** As per Blackvaults' page on the original solicitation: *"The term of the contract is from Date of Award through September 30, 2009. The contract will have four one-year options, for the period of September 29, 2008 through September 30, 2013."* [https://www.theblackvault.com/documentarchive/advanced-aerospace-weapon-systems-applications-program-aawsap-original-bid-solicitation/](https://www.theblackvault.com/documentarchive/advanced-aerospace-weapon-systems-applications-program-aawsap-original-bid-solicitation/) The last one-year option for FY 2012 - 2013 was not executed, possibly because the Directorship of the DIA changed during that period. LT. GEN. **Michael Flynn** is well known; what may not be well known is that he was a lifelong Democrat prior to becoming D-DIA. What changed his mind to run as a Republican with Trump? During his first few weeks as D-DIA, the U.S. Military discovered that the Tailban were using Stinger missiles against them in theatre that had been originally issued to the C.I.A.: [https://nypost.com/2014/06/08/how-the-taliban-got-their-hands-on-modern-us-missiles/](https://nypost.com/2014/06/08/how-the-taliban-got-their-hands-on-modern-us-missiles/) stinger CIA **Hillary Clinton’s** fingerprints were all over this supply chain when the Benghazi attack occurred later on in September 2012, prompting the “Lock Her Up” chant at campaign rallies. Flynn is also an Evangelical Christian and protégé of his predecessor Burgess. He may have also been involved in shutting ATTIP / AAWSAP down. [https://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/benghazi%20report%20appendix%204%20pages%2061-91.pdf](https://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/benghazi%20report%20appendix%204%20pages%2061-91.pdf) An interesting side note: Flynn was in the Command Group of GEN. **Stanley McChrystal**, as depicted in the movie “War Machine”. During the Icelandic volcano eruption in 2010, McChrystal and his entourage were accompanied by Rolling Stone magazine reporter **Michael Hastings** on a boozy bus trip to Berlin, necessary because all flights had been cancelled. During that trip, Flynn was reported to have told Hastings some interesting information regarding the then Special Assistant to President Obama on Homeland Security, and later, CIA Director **John Brennan**. Hastings later died in a mysterious car crash, which Former U.S. National Coordinator for Security, Infrastructure Protection, and Counter-terrorism **Richard Clarke** said “could be consistent with a cyber attack”. [https://www.huffpost.com/entry/michael-hastings-car-hacked\_n\_3492339](https://www.huffpost.com/entry/michael-hastings-car-hacked_n_3492339) As we also know through WikiLeaks, Democrat power broker **John Podesta** also had an interest in UFOs / UAPs at the time. The knowledge of AATIP / AAWSAP and the possibility of Podesta’s influence in a Hillary Clinton Presidency may have also been the catalyst for Flynn to become part of the Trump campaign, and may explain why he was heavily targeted very early on. ​ ![img](ktnltxmatjda1 "Bodies from a crash-retrieval?") **The Under Secretary of Defense, Intelligence and Security** Once the DIA Director defunded the AATIP/AAWSAP program, it became necessary to relocate it to a new “bucket of money” within Government. The **OUSD(I&S)** seemed like a perfect place to hide it – and most probably suggested by someone who had held that position previously and was very familiar with the Office. That person would be former USAF General **James Clapper.** **Knowing in 2010 that the AAWSAP / ATTIP program would be unfunded past 2012, he therefore establishes the required structures and moves it to within his own Office's remit.** ​ ![img](3rjt58r37jda1) **Ezra Cohen-Watnick** may not be very well known. He was a protégé of LT. GEN. Flynn, having trained at the C.I.A.’s “Farm” alongside Flynn’s son, Michael Flynn Jr. Although only acting in the USD(I&S) role for a short period of time, the fact that the June 25, 2021 UAP report had to be complete within 180 days of the directive means that Cohen-Watnick, along with DNI John Ratcliffe, initiated the first UAP report in December 2020. **Ronald Moultrie** is well known in the UFO / UAP community, **for all the wrong reasons.** **Director of National Intelligence** The Director of National Intelligence position was created in 2004 and supersedes the Director of Central Intelligence, who was the C.I.A. Director. It should be of surprise to no-one then why the 2021 report only went back to 2004 – there was zero cooperation from the C.I.A. relating to events prior to this date. Once again, some familiar faces pop up in the DNI role: ​ ![img](h0se4nf57jda1) **James Clapper** resigned from the DNI position the day of President Trump’s inauguration. It is also interesting to note that Clapper lying to Congress about U.S. Intelligence collecting information on its citizens was the catalyst for Edward Snowden to release evidence to the contrary. **Rick Grennell** has some interesting views on the UAP subject: [https://youtu.be/9mkrfrjtLos?t=231](https://youtu.be/9mkrfrjtLos?t=231) **John Ratcliffe** is also well known to our community for his comments regarding this subject. **Avril Haines** is known for famously stumbling when mentioning the word “extra-terrestrial”. She is speaking this week at the LBJ Library in Texas; hopefully more information will be forthcoming on the UAP subject. Incidentally, Haines will be speaking at **“America’s Secrets: Classified Information and Our Democracy**”, and event organised by the **Public Interest Declassification Board**: ​ ![img](o9tp5pe77jda1) [https://www.clementscenter.org/events/item/2668-america-s-secrets-classified-information-and-our-democracy](https://www.clementscenter.org/events/item/2668-america-s-secrets-classified-information-and-our-democracy) **P.S. - Don't shoot the messenger. I am merely providing the information - make of it what you will**. **EDIT**: Just had another thought - perhaps Burgess and Flynn defunded the program because, as their predecessor Wilson found out, the D-DIA didn't have a "need to know" about the WUSAPs. "***Why should we fund something we don't have access to?***" may have been the thinking. It was thus left to Clapper to find ways to fund the program, who was the D-DIA when **Bobby Ray Inman** was poised to become Secretary of Defense. Clapper may have known all about the WUSAPs and "the major engineering project" that **Oke Shannon's** notes claimed that Inman was running in 1985. Inman's SECDEF run was **torpedoed**, of course, by the **Computer UFO Network (CUFON)** letter sent to the Senate Armed Services Committee in 1994. [http://cufon.org/cufon/inmanpr.htm](http://cufon.org/cufon/inmanpr.htm) Clapper was probably the last Director - DIA to know what was actually going on regarding UFOs / UAPs.
January 23, 2023 12:41:38
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
The AAWSAP / AATIP Shell Game: understanding the mechanisms at play within The Blackvault's timeline.I thought I would present a few graphics to assist everyone to understand just what exactly has gone on with AATIP / AAWSAP over the timeline that **John Greenewald (**u/blackvault**)** has produced: [https://www.theblackvault.com/documentarchive/the-black-vaults-aawsap-aatip-and-post-2017-ufo-timeline-project/](https://www.theblackvault.com/documentarchive/the-black-vaults-aawsap-aatip-and-post-2017-ufo-timeline-project/) As the funding for these program(s) dried up, they were simply moved to other sections of government. “*But why did they dry up, Harry*?” I hear you ask. Well, I’ve also included a few facts to connect the dots amongst the players that may give an insight as to why this occurred, and things that are still in play today. First of all, one has to understand the long-running resentment / hatred between the Central Intelligence Agency and the U.S. Military and later the National Security Agency since the C.I.A.’s inception in 1947. I won’t go over it here, but this webpage goes into great detail over some of the larger problems: [https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/cyber-vault-intelligence/2015-03-20/cia-and-signals-intelligence](https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/cyber-vault-intelligence/2015-03-20/cia-and-signals-intelligence) The Director of Central Intelligence (DCI) controlled most if not all the UFO/UAP data up until the creation of the Director of National Intelligence position in 2004, due to the intelligence failures of 9/11. With that out of the way, let’s consider some of the other key Government positions regarding the UFO/UAP topic: **The Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency** ​ ![img](xy9tx9q17jda1) USAF General **James Clapper** is well known; as we will see, he has a key role in the “shell game” of moving AATIP/ AAWSAP around. Vice Admiral **Thomas Wilson** is also well-known in the UFO/UAP community – mainly because he was denied access to Waivered, Unacknowledged Special Access Programs regarding crash retrieval reverse engineering. LT. GEN **Ron Burgess** may not be that well known; an Evangelical Christian that was a major part of Donald Trumps’ Presidential Election campaign. He may have been the main driver of **the decision to defund AATIP / AAWSAP in 2009; the DIA money budgeted for the program, therefore, runs out in 2012.** As per Blackvaults' page on the original solicitation: *"The term of the contract is from Date of Award through September 30, 2009. The contract will have four one-year options, for the period of September 29, 2008 through September 30, 2013."* [https://www.theblackvault.com/documentarchive/advanced-aerospace-weapon-systems-applications-program-aawsap-original-bid-solicitation/](https://www.theblackvault.com/documentarchive/advanced-aerospace-weapon-systems-applications-program-aawsap-original-bid-solicitation/) The last one-year option for FY 2012 - 2013 was not executed, possibly because the Directorship of the DIA changed during that period. LT. GEN. **Michael Flynn** is well known; what may not be well known is that he was a lifelong Democrat prior to becoming D-DIA. What changed his mind to run as a Republican with Trump? During his first few weeks as D-DIA, the U.S. Military discovered that the Tailban were using Stinger missiles against them in theatre that had been originally issued to the C.I.A.: [https://nypost.com/2014/06/08/how-the-taliban-got-their-hands-on-modern-us-missiles/](https://nypost.com/2014/06/08/how-the-taliban-got-their-hands-on-modern-us-missiles/) stinger CIA **Hillary Clinton’s** fingerprints were all over this supply chain when the Benghazi attack occurred later on in September 2012, prompting the “Lock Her Up” chant at campaign rallies. Flynn is also an Evangelical Christian and protégé of his predecessor Burgess. He may have also been involved in shutting ATTIP / AAWSAP down. [https://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/benghazi%20report%20appendix%204%20pages%2061-91.pdf](https://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/benghazi%20report%20appendix%204%20pages%2061-91.pdf) An interesting side note: Flynn was in the Command Group of GEN. **Stanley McChrystal**, as depicted in the movie “War Machine”. During the Icelandic volcano eruption in 2010, McChrystal and his entourage were accompanied by Rolling Stone magazine reporter **Michael Hastings** on a boozy bus trip to Berlin, necessary because all flights had been cancelled. During that trip, Flynn was reported to have told Hastings some interesting information regarding the then Special Assistant to President Obama on Homeland Security, and later, CIA Director **John Brennan**. Hastings later died in a mysterious car crash, which Former U.S. National Coordinator for Security, Infrastructure Protection, and Counter-terrorism **Richard Clarke** said “could be consistent with a cyber attack”. [https://www.huffpost.com/entry/michael-hastings-car-hacked\_n\_3492339](https://www.huffpost.com/entry/michael-hastings-car-hacked_n_3492339) As we also know through WikiLeaks, Democrat power broker **John Podesta** also had an interest in UFOs / UAPs at the time. The knowledge of AATIP / AAWSAP and the possibility of Podesta’s influence in a Hillary Clinton Presidency may have also been the catalyst for Flynn to become part of the Trump campaign, and may explain why he was heavily targeted very early on. ​ ![img](ktnltxmatjda1 "Bodies from a crash-retrieval?") **The Under Secretary of Defense, Intelligence and Security** Once the DIA Director defunded the AATIP/AAWSAP program, it became necessary to relocate it to a new “bucket of money” within Government. The **OUSD(I&S)** seemed like a perfect place to hide it – and most probably suggested by someone who had held that position previously and was very familiar with the Office. That person would be former USAF General **James Clapper.** **Knowing in 2010 that the AAWSAP / ATTIP program would be unfunded past 2012, he therefore establishes the required structures and moves it to within his own Office's remit.** ​ ![img](3rjt58r37jda1) **Ezra Cohen-Watnick** may not be very well known. He was a protégé of LT. GEN. Flynn, having trained at the C.I.A.’s “Farm” alongside Flynn’s son, Michael Flynn Jr. Although only acting in the USD(I&S) role for a short period of time, the fact that the June 25, 2021 UAP report had to be complete within 180 days of the directive means that Cohen-Watnick, along with DNI John Ratcliffe, initiated the first UAP report in December 2020. **Ronald Moultrie** is well known in the UFO / UAP community, **for all the wrong reasons.** **Director of National Intelligence** The Director of National Intelligence position was created in 2004 and supersedes the Director of Central Intelligence, who was the C.I.A. Director. It should be of surprise to no-one then why the 2021 report only went back to 2004 – there was zero cooperation from the C.I.A. relating to events prior to this date. Once again, some familiar faces pop up in the DNI role: ​ ![img](h0se4nf57jda1) **James Clapper** resigned from the DNI position the day of President Trump’s inauguration. It is also interesting to note that Clapper lying to Congress about U.S. Intelligence collecting information on its citizens was the catalyst for Edward Snowden to release evidence to the contrary. **Rick Grennell** has some interesting views on the UAP subject: [https://youtu.be/9mkrfrjtLos?t=231](https://youtu.be/9mkrfrjtLos?t=231) **John Ratcliffe** is also well known to our community for his comments regarding this subject. **Avril Haines** is known for famously stumbling when mentioning the word “extra-terrestrial”. She is speaking this week at the LBJ Library in Texas; hopefully more information will be forthcoming on the UAP subject. Incidentally, Haines will be speaking at **“America’s Secrets: Classified Information and Our Democracy**”, and event organised by the **Public Interest Declassification Board**: ​ ![img](o9tp5pe77jda1) [https://www.clementscenter.org/events/item/2668-america-s-secrets-classified-information-and-our-democracy](https://www.clementscenter.org/events/item/2668-america-s-secrets-classified-information-and-our-democracy) **P.S. - Don't shoot the messenger. I am merely providing the information - make of it what you will**. **EDIT**: Just had another thought - perhaps Burgess and Flynn defunded the program because, as their predecessor Wilson found out, the D-DIA didn't have a "need to know" about the WUSAPs. "***Why should we fund something we don't have access to?***" may have been the thinking. It was thus left to Clapper to find ways to fund the program, who was the D-DIA when **Bobby Ray Inman** was poised to become Secretary of Defense. Clapper may have known all about the WUSAPs and "the major engineering project" that **Oke Shannon's** notes claimed that Inman was running in 1985. Inman's SECDEF run was **torpedoed**, of course, by the **Computer UFO Network (CUFON)** letter sent to the Senate Armed Services Committee in 1994. [http://cufon.org/cufon/inmanpr.htm](http://cufon.org/cufon/inmanpr.htm) Clapper was probably the last Director - DIA to know what was actually going on regarding UFOs / UAPs.
January 23, 2023 12:40:50
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
The psychology behind the lack of government disclosure.It seems that one of the most common things said over the last 80+ years is that the government does not disclose the truth because the general public won’t be able to handle it. It would seem to me that the people who think they’re saving us from the truth are they themselves stuck in a psychological loop that doesn’t allow them to disclose this information. From their perspective they are able to deal with the truth, they know the truth, and they’re protecting us from it. These people are putting themselves on a pedestal which makes them feel as though they themselves can deal with the truth and carry the burden of knowing. They may even think to themselves or feel that they are special for knowing information that the general public does not, including high power people and authority figures such as the POTUS or congress in general. I think the reality is they themselves aren’t able to handle it , and the lack of disclosure could be a coping mechanism of knowing that we’re not alone.
January 23, 2023 12:40:50
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
The psychology behind the lack of government disclosure.It seems that one of the most common things said over the last 80+ years is that the government does not disclose the truth because the general public won’t be able to handle it. It would seem to me that the people who think they’re saving us from the truth are they themselves stuck in a psychological loop that doesn’t allow them to disclose this information. From their perspective they are able to deal with the truth, they know the truth, and they’re protecting us from it. These people are putting themselves on a pedestal which makes them feel as though they themselves can deal with the truth and carry the burden of knowing. They may even think to themselves or feel that they are special for knowing information that the general public does not, including high power people and authority figures such as the POTUS or congress in general. I think the reality is they themselves aren’t able to handle it , and the lack of disclosure could be a coping mechanism of knowing that we’re not alone.
January 23, 2023 12:40:44
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Legacy programms and international politics.Hi, I would like to ask your thoughts/ ideas. Lets suppose concrete evidence of the existance of Legacy programms is found. The smoking gun if you will. Anecdotes and stories around this theme suggest that crashed craft may have been retrieved from e.g. outsite the US (from non-US soil) by the US army in the past. Possibly China and Russia have done the same. Countries where such material was, call it, stolen from may not be very happy about this. If such evidence becomes public. Even if the retrival was done with permission of the then local gouvernment in the 1940s or 1950s or so. Could there be international political consequenties? Or is it all to long ago?
January 23, 2023 12:40:43
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Legacy programms and international politics.Hi, I would like to ask your thoughts/ ideas. Lets suppose concrete evidence of the existance of Legacy programms is found. The smoking gun if you will. Anecdotes and stories around this theme suggest that crashed craft may have been retrieved from e.g. outsite the US (from non-US soil) by the US army in the past. Possibly China and Russia have done the same. Countries where such material was, call it, stolen from may not be very happy about this. If such evidence becomes public. Even if the retrival was done with permission of the then local gouvernment in the 1940s or 1950s or so. Could there be international political consequenties? Or is it all to long ago?
January 23, 2023 12:39:59
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Thoughts on the 1966 Michigan mass UFO sightings?There's not a lot of info online. Many people in Michigan allege that they saw something in the sky in the Spring of 1966. These sightings even got the attention of Gerald Ford, then a Congressman. That same March, a boy in neighbouring Sarnia Ontario, which is across the river from Michigan, claimed he saw a craft in the night sky. He said it disappeared as soon as he told his mother to look at it. His parents didn’t believe him. The next day the local newspaper reported on sightings in the local area. Investigators looked into the reports in Michigan, including the famed Ufologist Hynek, and concluded that it was "swamp gas". Has anyone else looked into this sighting? https://www.michiganradio.org/environment-science/2017-03-28/aliens-or-swamp-gas-the-mystery-of-michigans-most-famous-ufo-sighting-lives-on https://lfpress.com/entertainment/local-arts/documentary-examines-southwestern-ontario-boys-1966-ufo-claim
January 23, 2023 12:39:58
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Thoughts on the 1966 Michigan mass UFO sightings?There's not a lot of info online. Many people in Michigan allege that they saw something in the sky in the Spring of 1966. These sightings even got the attention of Gerald Ford, then a Congressman. That same March, a boy in neighbouring Sarnia Ontario, which is across the river from Michigan, claimed he saw a craft in the night sky. He said it disappeared as soon as he told his mother to look at it. His parents didn’t believe him. The next day the local newspaper reported on sightings in the local area. Investigators looked into the reports in Michigan, including the famed Ufologist Hynek, and concluded that it was "swamp gas". Has anyone else looked into this sighting? https://www.michiganradio.org/environment-science/2017-03-28/aliens-or-swamp-gas-the-mystery-of-michigans-most-famous-ufo-sighting-lives-on https://lfpress.com/entertainment/local-arts/documentary-examines-southwestern-ontario-boys-1966-ufo-claim
January 23, 2023 12:39:51
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Could they be us?I have believed for a very long time that these crafts are from our future and have been recently considering these visitors may be from our past. When we today, walk past an ant hill, do we stop and visit and communicate? I have thought for over 40 years that the only people interested in us, is us. I am in my early 50's and when I was young, I was taught at school that our solar system is the only solar system with planets. I always knew this wasn't the case. If there is an abundance of life in the complete universe, it is teaming with it. The ONLY beings interested in us as "ants" is us in some form or another in the past or in the future. A question I ponder. If you could manipulate time and space, if you could go anywhere, of course we would visit other civilizations, but after doing this, we would not be looking at the ants, we would spend most of our time coming back and checking ourselves out in the past and the future.
January 23, 2023 12:39:51
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Could they be us?I have believed for a very long time that these crafts are from our future and have been recently considering these visitors may be from our past. When we today, walk past an ant hill, do we stop and visit and communicate? I have thought for over 40 years that the only people interested in us, is us. I am in my early 50's and when I was young, I was taught at school that our solar system is the only solar system with planets. I always knew this wasn't the case. If there is an abundance of life in the complete universe, it is teaming with it. The ONLY beings interested in us as "ants" is us in some form or another in the past or in the future. A question I ponder. If you could manipulate time and space, if you could go anywhere, of course we would visit other civilizations, but after doing this, we would not be looking at the ants, we would spend most of our time coming back and checking ourselves out in the past and the future.
January 23, 2023 12:39:39
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
UFO/UAP Sightings Chart...💥 Hello Everyone, I typically connect with this community via. UFO Twitter and am not on Reddit often. I recently made this chart of every UAP, orb, apparition, and observable I've ever seen during CE5 and and on random occasions. If you all can relate to my sightings, I'd love to talk about it.... Hope this can help you all know that you aren't alone and you're not crazy. Please feel free to share this with other experiencers. I'm hoping this can help as many people as possible and start a conversation about the variation in observables. ![img](nhsq0v2vxida1)
January 23, 2023 12:39:39
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
UFO/UAP Sightings Chart...💥 Hello Everyone, I typically connect with this community via. UFO Twitter and am not on Reddit often. I recently made this chart of every UAP, orb, apparition, and observable I've ever seen during CE5 and and on random occasions. If you all can relate to my sightings, I'd love to talk about it.... Hope this can help you all know that you aren't alone and you're not crazy. Please feel free to share this with other experiencers. I'm hoping this can help as many people as possible and start a conversation about the variation in observables. ![img](nhsq0v2vxida1)
January 23, 2023 12:39:29
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Weekly UFO Sightings: January 22 - January 28, 2023Welcome to our weekly UFO sightings thread. Share your footage, imagery, or other evidence of UFO sightings without worrying about our standard [posting guidelines](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/wiki/posting_guidelines). ​ When possible, please include the location and date/time of the sighting. ​ If you'd like to make your own post instead of commenting here, please check the [r/UFOs posting guidelines](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/wiki/posting_guidelines) first. ​ You can view [past Weekly Sighting posts here.](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/search?q=%22Weekly+UFO+Sightings%3A%22&restrict_sr=on&include_over_18=on&sort=new&t=all)
January 23, 2023 12:39:29
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Weekly UFO Sightings: January 22 - January 28, 2023Welcome to our weekly UFO sightings thread. Share your footage, imagery, or other evidence of UFO sightings without worrying about our standard [posting guidelines](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/wiki/posting_guidelines). ​ When possible, please include the location and date/time of the sighting. ​ If you'd like to make your own post instead of commenting here, please check the [r/UFOs posting guidelines](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/wiki/posting_guidelines) first. ​ You can view [past Weekly Sighting posts here.](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/search?q=%22Weekly+UFO+Sightings%3A%22&restrict_sr=on&include_over_18=on&sort=new&t=all)
January 23, 2023 12:39:24
sticky:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, criznittle. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10iu4k3/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 11: Posts similar to previous [Common Question posts](https://www.reddit.com/r/ufos/wiki/commonquestions) must include a link to the previous thread. Our aim is to consolidate existing responses and discourage redundant posts from users who have not viewed previous threads. Users may suggest future questions to ask (or re-ask) in series at any time [using this link](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2Fufos&subject=Common%20Question%20Suggestion). Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 23, 2023 12:39:24
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, criznittle. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10iu4k3/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 11: Posts similar to previous [Common Question posts](https://www.reddit.com/r/ufos/wiki/commonquestions) must include a link to the previous thread. Our aim is to consolidate existing responses and discourage redundant posts from users who have not viewed previous threads. Users may suggest future questions to ask (or re-ask) in series at any time [using this link](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2Fufos&subject=Common%20Question%20Suggestion). Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 23, 2023 12:39:23
editflair:
flair_edit (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
What if most, if not all UFO sightings are calculated?This would imply either time travel, communication with the future, or some AI that can anticipate future outcomes. I'd say the latter is most likely, but who knows. If they can manipulate gravity as Bob Lazar claims, they might actually have methods of time travel. Apologies if this isn't allowed here or has been considered before, i just joined and am rather new at this idea of UFOs actually being ET.
January 23, 2023 12:39:21
removelink:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
What if most, if not all UFO sightings are calculated?This would imply either time travel, communication with the future, or some AI that can anticipate future outcomes. I'd say the latter is most likely, but who knows. If they can manipulate gravity as Bob Lazar claims, they might actually have methods of time travel. Apologies if this isn't allowed here or has been considered before, i just joined and am rather new at this idea of UFOs actually being ET.
January 23, 2023 04:49:47
edit_scheduled_post:
"Subreddit Updates & Announcing UFOS.WIKI" title (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
January 23, 2023 04:35:29
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
> A comprehensive list would prevent frequent reposts and also narrow down the genuinely mysterious incidents to ones we can easily discuss. Possibly, but I think questions related to the most common cases are usually unique (i.e. difficult to build rules around removing) and drowned out by original or low-effort sighting posts. 'Geniunely unexplained' implies an unstated criteria, so you'd have to parse that out first. Although, what you're looking for technically already exists in a few forms: 1. Isaac Koi has tabulated the [most historically referenced cases here.](https://www.isaackoi.com/best-ufo-cases/13-the-top-100-ufo-cases.html) 2. Many ufologists have offered their own ['best case' lists which we've tabulated here.](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1PG7x2wj21n7XWLCGbW20HetVoMzBzSNDojGGuSZInA8/edit#gid=1972692673) 3. We've calculated the [cases most frequently mentioned across all those lists here.](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1PG7x2wj21n7XWLCGbW20HetVoMzBzSNDojGGuSZInA8/edit#gid=0) 4. We've also offered our own 'best case' criteria and selected a [handful of cases we think meet them here.](https://ufos.wiki/cases/) The UFOS WIKI is open to feedback and additions from everyone. The biggest barrier at the moment to a more commonly understood answer to your question, in my opinion, is people simply not having read it and contributing in some form.
January 22, 2023 16:58:57
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
How to Report a Sighting
January 22, 2023 15:24:24
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
How to Report a Sighting
January 22, 2023 15:23:48
submit_scheduled_post:
scheduled for Sun, 22 Jan 2023 02:23 PM CST (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
How to Report a Sighting
January 22, 2023 15:23:48
sticky:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
How to Report a Sighting
January 22, 2023 15:23:48
unsticky:
replaced (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Weekly UFO Sightings: January 22 - January 28, 2023Welcome to our weekly UFO sightings thread. Share your footage, imagery, or other evidence of UFO sightings without worrying about our standard [posting guidelines](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/wiki/posting_guidelines). ​ When possible, please include the location and date/time of the sighting. ​ If you'd like to make your own post instead of commenting here, please check the [r/UFOs posting guidelines](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/wiki/posting_guidelines) first. ​ You can view [past Weekly Sighting posts here.](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/search?q=%22Weekly+UFO+Sightings%3A%22&restrict_sr=on&include_over_18=on&sort=new&t=all)
January 22, 2023 15:23:35
create_scheduled_post:
"How to Report a Sighting" scheduled for Sun, 22 Jan 2023 02:30 PM CST (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
January 22, 2023 15:13:52
delete_scheduled_post:
"Weekly UFO Sightings: {{date %B %d}} - {{date+6 %B %d, %Y}}" scheduled for Sun, 29 Jan 2023 02:00 AM MST (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
January 22, 2023 04:00:13
submit_scheduled_post:
submitted on Sun, 29 Jan 2023 02:00 AM MST (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Weekly UFO Sightings: January 22 - January 28, 2023Welcome to our weekly UFO sightings thread. Share your footage, imagery, or other evidence of UFO sightings without worrying about our standard [posting guidelines](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/wiki/posting_guidelines). ​ When possible, please include the location and date/time of the sighting. ​ If you'd like to make your own post instead of commenting here, please check the [r/UFOs posting guidelines](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/wiki/posting_guidelines) first. ​ You can view [past Weekly Sighting posts here.](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/search?q=%22Weekly+UFO+Sightings%3A%22&restrict_sr=on&include_over_18=on&sort=new&t=all)
January 22, 2023 04:00:13
setsuggestedsort:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Weekly UFO Sightings: January 22 - January 28, 2023Welcome to our weekly UFO sightings thread. Share your footage, imagery, or other evidence of UFO sightings without worrying about our standard [posting guidelines](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/wiki/posting_guidelines). ​ When possible, please include the location and date/time of the sighting. ​ If you'd like to make your own post instead of commenting here, please check the [r/UFOs posting guidelines](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/wiki/posting_guidelines) first. ​ You can view [past Weekly Sighting posts here.](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/search?q=%22Weekly+UFO+Sightings%3A%22&restrict_sr=on&include_over_18=on&sort=new&t=all)
January 22, 2023 04:00:13
sticky:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Weekly UFO Sightings: January 22 - January 28, 2023Welcome to our weekly UFO sightings thread. Share your footage, imagery, or other evidence of UFO sightings without worrying about our standard [posting guidelines](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/wiki/posting_guidelines). ​ When possible, please include the location and date/time of the sighting. ​ If you'd like to make your own post instead of commenting here, please check the [r/UFOs posting guidelines](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/wiki/posting_guidelines) first. ​ You can view [past Weekly Sighting posts here.](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/search?q=%22Weekly+UFO+Sightings%3A%22&restrict_sr=on&include_over_18=on&sort=new&t=all)
January 22, 2023 04:00:13
unsticky:
replaced (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
How to Report a Sighting
January 21, 2023 13:04:14
unsticky:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Posts of the same footage, link, or news article may not be posted within a week of one another. New articles or previously unlinked footage may be posted at any time. If you have multiple videos of the same object, include them all in the same post, not as individual submissions.
January 21, 2023 13:04:14
removecomment:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Posts of the same footage, link, or news article may not be posted within a week of one another. New articles or previously unlinked footage may be posted at any time. If you have multiple videos of the same object, include them all in the same post, not as individual submissions.
January 21, 2023 12:48:45
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Dude I don’t see any link in any of your comments. Am I missing something?
January 21, 2023 12:48:34
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
i was outside the back of my house at about 9:45pm having a smoke and i always look up at the sky on a clear night because space fascinates me, ever since i was a kid. i see these blinking lights in a sequence every couple of seconds coming towards me and i said out loud “what the fuck is that” initially thinking it was a stealth bomber from the shape of the lights so i started recording because i’ve never seen one in flight and as it past directly over me i noticed it was a diamond shape so i had to run around the back of the house while still filming and get back on it which i did but you can see near the end that the sky is so clear the object goes in between two bright stars but the lights are all an orange/red colour still with the underneath light flashing red
January 21, 2023 12:48:14
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
When I clicked it the top said [t.co](https://t.co), which shouldn't happen. I think that's why the automod removed it. I arbitrarily approved it
January 21, 2023 12:48:05
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Plenty of smartasses trying to get something from the gullible. Doesn’t mean there isn’t anything out there… but sure makes it hard for the whole credibility of it all.
January 21, 2023 12:47:59
removecomment:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Give your phone to an adult please
January 21, 2023 12:47:56
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Give your phone to an adult please
January 21, 2023 12:47:56
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Give your phone to an adult please
January 21, 2023 12:47:43
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, bigsnack4u. Thanks for contributing. However, your [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10husdr/-/j5ap6gt/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 1: Follow the Standards of Civility > * No trolling or being disruptive. > * No insults or personal attacks. > * No accusations that other users are shills. > * No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation. > * No harassment, threats, or advocating violence. > * No witch hunts or doxxing. (Please redact usernames when possible) > * You may attack each other's ideas, not each other. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 21, 2023 12:47:41
removecomment:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Give your phone to an adult please
January 21, 2023 12:47:38
wikirevise:
Page usernotes edited "create new note on new user bigsnack4u" via toolbox (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
January 21, 2023 12:47:26
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Steven Greer is a highly respected figure in the field of ufology, known for his tireless efforts to promote awareness of the existence and potential implications of extraterrestrial life. He has dedicated his life to investigating and researching the topic and has gained a reputation as a credible and trustworthy authority on the subject. He has also been praised for his ability to present complex information in a clear and accessible manner, making it easier for the general public to understand and engage with the topic. Steven Greer is an extremely valuable asset to the field of ufology and has made important contributions to the understanding of extraterrestrial life and its potential impact on humanity.
January 21, 2023 12:47:07
sticky:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, Jasondonovan20. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10hv1d0/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. Report posts are specifically for sighting reports and require a top-level comment (if a link post) or the post text to include the [Report template](https://ufoswiki.wpengine.com/reports/#template). If your post is a sighting report, please add that comment or body text. If it is a different type of post, please use a different post flair. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 21, 2023 12:47:07
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, Jasondonovan20. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10hv1d0/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. Report posts are specifically for sighting reports and require a top-level comment (if a link post) or the post text to include the [Report template](https://ufoswiki.wpengine.com/reports/#template). If your post is a sighting report, please add that comment or body text. If it is a different type of post, please use a different post flair. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 21, 2023 12:47:05
removelink:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Recent article making its way around (links in comment)
January 21, 2023 12:46:58
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
I was just going to suggest that anybody who wants more of this type of thing should go directly to Jacques Vallee's "Passport to Magonia." Bears rereading for fun now and then. https://a.co/b4J85op
January 21, 2023 12:46:52
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
And you just hit the nail on the head as to why the UFO community will never have any sort of credibility. The community (and this sub) take advantage of and thrive on disorganization. It’s like the blind leading the blind. Nobody wants to really narrow anything down when it comes to any sort of structure or outline like you are suggesting. It’s like a ship sailing in stormy seas and nobody is at the helm. Having no clear direction and no outline invites any and every wild speculation and idea possible. Having no guidelines allows the community to grow. And anybody that has an agenda within the UFO community, whether it’s financially motivated or simply motivated by member counts, they all benefit off disorganization. The more organization and structure you bring to the UFO community the more you start to lose your customer base.
January 21, 2023 12:46:52
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
And you just hit the nail on the head as to why the UFO community will never have any sort of credibility. The community (and this sub) take advantage of and thrive on disorganization. It’s like the blind leading the blind. Nobody wants to really narrow anything down when it comes to any sort of structure or outline like you are suggesting. It’s like a ship sailing in stormy seas and nobody is at the helm. Having no clear direction and no outline invites any and every wild speculation and idea possible. Having no guidelines allows the community to grow. And anybody that has an agenda within the UFO community, whether it’s financially motivated or simply motivated by member counts, they all benefit off disorganization. The more organization and structure you bring to the UFO community the more you start to lose your customer base.
January 21, 2023 12:46:20
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Sorry, but you can’t say aliens anymore, because it is racist. Please refer to them as extraterrestrial flying persons (they/them) or non-earth persons. Vampires would also be offensive, since mosquitoes might find it as cultural appropriation, so we would refer to them as blood-drinking persons, who do not identify as mosquitoes. Please mind your language, this is a safe space!
January 21, 2023 12:46:19
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Sorry, but you can’t say aliens anymore, because it is racist. Please refer to them as extraterrestrial flying persons (they/them) or non-earth persons. Vampires would also be offensive, since mosquitoes might find it as cultural appropriation, so we would refer to them as blood-drinking persons, who do not identify as mosquitoes. Please mind your language, this is a safe space!
January 21, 2023 12:46:11
sticky:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, nBREAK. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10hn8ie/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 9: Link posts must include a submission statement. > Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post). Submission statements may contain a summary or description of the content, why it is relevant to UFOs, the submitter's personal perspectives, or all of the above and must be at least 150 characters in length. If a statement is not added within thirty minutes of posting it will be removed. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 21, 2023 12:46:11
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, nBREAK. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10hn8ie/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 9: Link posts must include a submission statement. > Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post). Submission statements may contain a summary or description of the content, why it is relevant to UFOs, the submitter's personal perspectives, or all of the above and must be at least 150 characters in length. If a statement is not added within thirty minutes of posting it will be removed. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 21, 2023 12:46:11
editflair:
flair_edit (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
BAD CHARACTER - DON'T TRY 2 CATCH ME
January 21, 2023 12:46:10
removelink:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
BAD CHARACTER - DON'T TRY 2 CATCH ME
January 21, 2023 12:45:49
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
> Your first point is completely irrelevant. ... but then how can the Sun affect their eyes if they can't really see the Sun? It was between the time the rain stopped and the clouds allowed the Sun through. Many stopped staring after that. Dr. José Almeida Garrett claimed up and down that it wasn't a hallucination or ocular damage, even though he goes on to describe effects of temporary damage after he looked away... > Fearing that I was suffering from an affection of the retina, an improbable explanation because in that case one could not see things purple-colored, I turned away and shut my eyes, keeping my hands before them to intercept the light. With my back still turned, I opened my eyes and saw that the landscape was the same purple color as before. https://www.healthgrades.com/right-care/eye-health/why-am-i-seeing-purple > It doesn't matter if nobody has claimed so in this thread yet, it's preemptive rebuttal. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
January 21, 2023 12:45:31
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, 3DGuy2020. Thanks for contributing. However, your [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10hd6f3/-/j58x9c7/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 1: Follow the Standards of Civility > * No trolling or being disruptive. > * No insults or personal attacks. > * No accusations that other users are shills. > * No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation. > * No harassment, threats, or advocating violence. > * No witch hunts or doxxing. (Please redact usernames when possible) > * You may attack each other's ideas, not each other. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 21, 2023 12:45:29
removecomment:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Umm, wtf do you want him to do, use “unknown physics”?! Dumbest shit I’ve read in a few years.
January 21, 2023 12:45:26
wikirevise:
Page usernotes edited "create new note on new user 3DGuy2020" via toolbox (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
January 21, 2023 12:45:09
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Do you have link ? Or supporting documents? Otherwise, I’m gonna fill that in with sock puppet pile.
January 21, 2023 12:45:08
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Do you have link ? Or supporting documents? Otherwise, I’m gonna fill that in with sock puppet pile.
January 21, 2023 12:44:54
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
*Scottish accent* Ya fuck one fucking sheep
January 21, 2023 12:44:53
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
*Scottish accent* Ya fuck one fucking sheep
January 21, 2023 12:44:42
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Dr. Who drunk driving, again. That man should seek help.
January 21, 2023 12:44:41
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Dr. Who drunk driving, again. That man should seek help.
January 21, 2023 12:44:38
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Artificial_Telepathy Sub Reddit.com
January 21, 2023 12:44:38
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Artificial_Telepathy Sub Reddit.com
January 21, 2023 12:44:36
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
This personality trait seems to be due to an inert sense of fear over the subject. It seems to be mostly women who deal with the topic in this way, and I don't mean that in a misogynistic way either because not all women are afraid of it.
January 21, 2023 12:44:36
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
This personality trait seems to be due to an inert sense of fear over the subject. It seems to be mostly women who deal with the topic in this way, and I don't mean that in a misogynistic way either because not all women are afraid of it.
January 21, 2023 11:45:48
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
The Black Vault’s AAWSAP/AATIP and Post 2017 UAP/UFO Timeline Project
January 21, 2023 11:45:47
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
The Black Vault’s AAWSAP/AATIP and Post 2017 UAP/UFO Timeline Project
January 21, 2023 11:45:36
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
A stickied list of genuinely unexplained incidents would really helpThere are so many events that a comprehensive list we can edit/contribute to would really help. The Valentich case, for instance, has never been explained. The footage of the Russian disc retrieval has been thoroughly debunked. The recent Navy videos remain mysterious, but the alleged Apollo 20 Mona Lisa recording is a fake. A comprehensive list would prevent frequent reposts and also narrow down the genuinely mysterious incidents to ones we can easily discuss.
January 21, 2023 11:44:15
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Excellent work so far John, thank you for posting this.
January 21, 2023 11:43:48
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hope the mods don't mind this, but am looking for feedback. Here is a very preliminary release of a new project I am working on. This will be incredibly valuable (even if it's just for me! 🤣) to try and make sense of the ever-evolving and changing UAP discussion as it unfolds. What do you think thus far?
January 21, 2023 11:43:48
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hope the mods don't mind this, but am looking for feedback. Here is a very preliminary release of a new project I am working on. This will be incredibly valuable (even if it's just for me! 🤣) to try and make sense of the ever-evolving and changing UAP discussion as it unfolds. What do you think thus far?
January 21, 2023 11:43:46
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
The Black Vault’s AAWSAP/AATIP and Post 2017 UAP/UFO Timeline Project
January 20, 2023 18:54:16
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
James Rigney - The man behind the Admiral Wilson leaks
January 20, 2023 18:53:55
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Transylvania, Sigisoara. Ancient UFO sighting?
January 20, 2023 18:53:55
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Transylvania, Sigisoara. Ancient UFO sighting?
January 20, 2023 18:53:18
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Best YouTube UFO channel i've ever seenI've spent countless hours watching UFO videos and documentaries' to the point that i was just seeing reruns. I ran into this channel and my god, when you thought you've seen it all.... What really grinds my gears is when a channel starts posting off the way fake stuff. This is the real deal guys, lets make people aware of it so we can convert them! Everytime that i watch a video i download the video for safe keeping so it doesn't disappear. I basically use this format... Anytime there is a video that i want to download, i put a pi after youtube in the url and press enter the find the one that you want to download and convert then hit download. example: [https://www.youtubepi.com/watch?v=4OHzUalark8&t=781s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4OHzUalark8&t=781s) Youtube Channel [https://www.youtube.com/@EyesOnCinema/videos](https://www.youtube.com/@EyesOnCinema/videos)
January 20, 2023 18:53:17
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Best YouTube UFO channel i've ever seenI've spent countless hours watching UFO videos and documentaries' to the point that i was just seeing reruns. I ran into this channel and my god, when you thought you've seen it all.... What really grinds my gears is when a channel starts posting off the way fake stuff. This is the real deal guys, lets make people aware of it so we can convert them! Everytime that i watch a video i download the video for safe keeping so it doesn't disappear. I basically use this format... Anytime there is a video that i want to download, i put a pi after youtube in the url and press enter the find the one that you want to download and convert then hit download. example: [https://www.youtubepi.com/watch?v=4OHzUalark8&t=781s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4OHzUalark8&t=781s) Youtube Channel [https://www.youtube.com/@EyesOnCinema/videos](https://www.youtube.com/@EyesOnCinema/videos)
January 20, 2023 18:52:14
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
These kind of UFO,s are called in the American military tic tac for they’re shape. There’s a lot of documents episodes about them. They were mostly located I guess in the Pacific Ocean
January 20, 2023 18:51:37
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
On top of the fact it already passed the airport in the video and in the video it's sitting still for 9 10 seconds you can cleary see or maybe you don't 🤷‍♂️
January 20, 2023 18:51:34
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Yes your correct there is a airport in the back but the airport had no flights at the current time we check flight logs and called the airport aswell as the tower there was nothing at the time and those lights aren't following regulations like you say for all regulation aircraft on the left wing is a red blinking light and on the right wing is a green blinking light and you don't see a green blinking light do you it's a completely illegal plane if that not even considering how low it was maybe 1000 to 2000 feet andit sat still for minutes beforehand aswell as the craft being saucer shaped in person with no sharp points a plane would have
January 20, 2023 18:51:27
sticky:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, xellos_ae. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10hc1w7/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 9: Link posts must include a submission statement. > Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post). Submission statements may contain a summary or description of the content, why it is relevant to UFOs, the submitter's personal perspectives, or all of the above and must be at least 150 characters in length. If a statement is not added within thirty minutes of posting it will be removed. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 20, 2023 18:51:27
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, xellos_ae. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10hc1w7/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 9: Link posts must include a submission statement. > Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post). Submission statements may contain a summary or description of the content, why it is relevant to UFOs, the submitter's personal perspectives, or all of the above and must be at least 150 characters in length. If a statement is not added within thirty minutes of posting it will be removed. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 20, 2023 18:51:27
editflair:
flair_edit (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Ufo spotted over champaign county il 1/9/2023 8:05 to 8:15what lead up to this was I was on the highway looking at the stars and I seen this star disappear and I said did that fucking star just dissappear and then it appeared right in front of my view mind you were 10 15 miles away still and I see it blinking blue and green lights and were watching it the whole time and we get maybe like 4 5 miles away and we can't figure out what this thing is still so we take a right and we realize we're pivoting around the craft mind you it didnt move the whole time then we take a left going straight towards this craft and we get to an intersection and it explodes like paintball splatter but slow but slowly growing and as bright as the sun and that's for about 5 6 seconds then started to get smaller and that's when I started recording and if you zoom in on the very first couple seconds of the video you can see it looking like a star with different points and how bright it is the zoomed in version Is on my page so you can see for yourself it couldn't be a plane either because the red light is always on the left and the green light is always on the right for all regulation aircraft aswell as it being completely silent so I think it mimics the lights so it doesn't get spotted as easy but I'm not sure
January 20, 2023 18:51:26
removelink:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Ufo spotted over champaign county il 1/9/2023 8:05 to 8:15what lead up to this was I was on the highway looking at the stars and I seen this star disappear and I said did that fucking star just dissappear and then it appeared right in front of my view mind you were 10 15 miles away still and I see it blinking blue and green lights and were watching it the whole time and we get maybe like 4 5 miles away and we can't figure out what this thing is still so we take a right and we realize we're pivoting around the craft mind you it didnt move the whole time then we take a left going straight towards this craft and we get to an intersection and it explodes like paintball splatter but slow but slowly growing and as bright as the sun and that's for about 5 6 seconds then started to get smaller and that's when I started recording and if you zoom in on the very first couple seconds of the video you can see it looking like a star with different points and how bright it is the zoomed in version Is on my page so you can see for yourself it couldn't be a plane either because the red light is always on the left and the green light is always on the right for all regulation aircraft aswell as it being completely silent so I think it mimics the lights so it doesn't get spotted as easy but I'm not sure
January 20, 2023 18:51:23
sticky:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, enetrthedragon420. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10hbv3r/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 9: Link posts must include a submission statement. > Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post). Submission statements may contain a summary or description of the content, why it is relevant to UFOs, the submitter's personal perspectives, or all of the above and must be at least 150 characters in length. If a statement is not added within thirty minutes of posting it will be removed. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 20, 2023 18:51:22
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, enetrthedragon420. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10hbv3r/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 9: Link posts must include a submission statement. > Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post). Submission statements may contain a summary or description of the content, why it is relevant to UFOs, the submitter's personal perspectives, or all of the above and must be at least 150 characters in length. If a statement is not added within thirty minutes of posting it will be removed. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 20, 2023 18:51:22
editflair:
flair_edit (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
UFO Roundup 20th Jan
January 20, 2023 18:51:21
removelink:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
UFO Roundup 20th Jan
January 20, 2023 18:51:11
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
No results? Come on, old man. You can do better than that.
January 20, 2023 18:51:11
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
No results? Come on, old man. You can do better than that.
January 20, 2023 18:50:57
sticky:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, MWFilmResearch96. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10hbfuh/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 3: No low effort posts or comments. Low Effort implies content which is low effort to consume, not low effort to produce. This generally includes: > * Memes, jokes, cartoons, and art (art is only allowed if it's depicting a real event). > * Tweets and screenshots of posts or comments from social media without significant relevance. > * Incredible claims unsupported by evidence. > * Shower thoughts. > * One-to-three word comments or emojis. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 20, 2023 18:50:57
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, MWFilmResearch96. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10hbfuh/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 3: No low effort posts or comments. Low Effort implies content which is low effort to consume, not low effort to produce. This generally includes: > * Memes, jokes, cartoons, and art (art is only allowed if it's depicting a real event). > * Tweets and screenshots of posts or comments from social media without significant relevance. > * Incredible claims unsupported by evidence. > * Shower thoughts. > * One-to-three word comments or emojis. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 20, 2023 18:50:57
editflair:
flair_edit (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Skin-walkers? Anyone got any stories about skin-walkers or any photo evidence for a documentary
January 20, 2023 18:50:55
removelink:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Skin-walkers? Anyone got any stories about skin-walkers or any photo evidence for a documentary
January 20, 2023 18:50:37
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
You are blowing your cover by asking questions like that.
January 20, 2023 18:50:37
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
You are blowing your cover by asking questions like that.
January 20, 2023 18:50:30
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
This one had multiple videos from different people
January 20, 2023 18:50:28
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Jeremy ‘hype train’ Corbell whose Instagram feed reads like he’s about to drop a new hip hop album and George ‘I interviewed Bob Lazar’ Knapp. Wake me up when Elizondo’s NDA expires.
January 20, 2023 18:50:02
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
These guys are so dying to blow up a UFO lol
January 20, 2023 18:49:56
sticky:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, scrfvicious. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10ha609/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 9: Link posts must include a submission statement. > Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post). Submission statements may contain a summary or description of the content, why it is relevant to UFOs, the submitter's personal perspectives, or all of the above and must be at least 150 characters in length. If a statement is not added within thirty minutes of posting it will be removed. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 20, 2023 18:49:56
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, scrfvicious. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10ha609/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 9: Link posts must include a submission statement. > Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post). Submission statements may contain a summary or description of the content, why it is relevant to UFOs, the submitter's personal perspectives, or all of the above and must be at least 150 characters in length. If a statement is not added within thirty minutes of posting it will be removed. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 20, 2023 18:49:55
editflair:
flair_edit (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
4 everyone
January 20, 2023 18:49:54
removelink:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
4 everyone
January 20, 2023 18:49:27
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Read the thread. Voltaseven is a CGI artist who made many admitted CGI videos with the same models.
January 20, 2023 18:49:27
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Read the thread. Voltaseven is a CGI artist who made many admitted CGI videos with the same models.
January 20, 2023 18:49:25
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Are you even replying to the right person? I think you lost the thread m8. Sad.
January 20, 2023 18:49:24
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Are you even replying to the right person? I think you lost the thread m8. Sad.
January 20, 2023 18:49:11
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Did that stop the Temple Mount UFO hoax in 2011?
January 20, 2023 18:49:11
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Did that stop the Temple Mount UFO hoax in 2011?
January 20, 2023 18:49:06
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, upfoo51. Thanks for contributing. However, your [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10gntzn/-/j576580/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 1: Follow the Standards of Civility > * No trolling or being disruptive. > * No insults or personal attacks. > * No accusations that other users are shills. > * No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation. > * No harassment, threats, or advocating violence. > * No witch hunts or doxxing. (Please redact usernames when possible) > * You may attack each other's ideas, not each other. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 20, 2023 18:49:05
removecomment:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Wow what an idiotic thing to say. Fool.
January 20, 2023 18:49:02
wikirevise:
Page usernotes edited "create new note on user upfoo51" via toolbox (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
January 20, 2023 18:48:46
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Did someone mention to you that an artist who does geometric artwork claimed it was his? https://twitter.com/Adyorism/status/1076501497121169408
January 20, 2023 18:48:46
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Did someone mention to you that an artist who does geometric artwork claimed it was his? https://twitter.com/Adyorism/status/1076501497121169408
January 20, 2023 18:48:37
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2022/05/fact-check-ufo-in-shape-of-pyramid-not-seen-in-2018-it-was-created-by-cgi.html https://www.reddit.com/r/aliens/comments/y0vpvd/comment/irut2vl/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3
January 20, 2023 18:48:37
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2022/05/fact-check-ufo-in-shape-of-pyramid-not-seen-in-2018-it-was-created-by-cgi.html https://www.reddit.com/r/aliens/comments/y0vpvd/comment/irut2vl/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3
January 20, 2023 18:48:21
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
UFO/UAP/Alien - Update - magic number 171
January 20, 2023 18:48:20
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
UFO/UAP/Alien - Update - magic number 171
January 20, 2023 18:48:01
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
I gave a response [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/ufo/comments/10h0zr2/did_this_man_come_forward_are_there_records_in_a/) But he was five years old at the time and his story has holes in it contradicted by others.
January 20, 2023 18:48:01
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
I gave a response [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/ufo/comments/10h0zr2/did_this_man_come_forward_are_there_records_in_a/) But he was five years old at the time and his story has holes in it contradicted by others.
January 20, 2023 18:47:56
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Gerald Anderson | Roswell UFO Witness - Project Unity
January 20, 2023 18:47:56
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Gerald Anderson | Roswell UFO Witness - Project Unity
January 20, 2023 18:47:55
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
There is a point to the phenomenon. It's to show us that birds are not, in fact, real.
January 20, 2023 18:47:54
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
There is a point to the phenomenon. It's to show us that birds are not, in fact, real.
January 20, 2023 13:43:00
unlock:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
How to Report a Sighting
January 20, 2023 13:36:41
lock:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
How to Report a Sighting
January 20, 2023 11:01:15
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Multiple unidentified objects flying in sky
January 20, 2023 11:01:15
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Multiple unidentified objects flying in sky
January 20, 2023 11:00:43
sticky:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, Tichmazg. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10gsrdn/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 9: Link posts must include a submission statement. > Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post). Submission statements may contain a summary or description of the content, why it is relevant to UFOs, the submitter's personal perspectives, or all of the above and must be at least 150 characters in length. If a statement is not added within thirty minutes of posting it will be removed. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 20, 2023 11:00:42
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, Tichmazg. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10gsrdn/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 9: Link posts must include a submission statement. > Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post). Submission statements may contain a summary or description of the content, why it is relevant to UFOs, the submitter's personal perspectives, or all of the above and must be at least 150 characters in length. If a statement is not added within thirty minutes of posting it will be removed. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 20, 2023 11:00:42
editflair:
flair_edit (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
What John Lear Knew about the Moon, Suppressed Science, and the Secret T...
January 20, 2023 11:00:41
removelink:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
What John Lear Knew about the Moon, Suppressed Science, and the Secret T...
January 20, 2023 11:00:26
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Academic, university based UAP research initiatives? Favorite UFologist?I'm aware of Avi Loeb's Galileo Project at Harvard, but I'm wondering if there are other major (or minor) UAP research initiatives at universities globally. Google has either not been helpful or there are no others, which would be (slightly) surprising at this point. Also, anybody have a favorite UFologist? Thanks so much
January 20, 2023 10:59:50
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Cylindrical UFO Seen In Several Locations In South Africa! A mysterious cylindrical UFO has been sighted in several cities in South Africa, including Thohoyandou, Pretoria, Sandton, Bloemfontein, Bethlehem, Soweto.
January 20, 2023 10:59:50
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Cylindrical UFO Seen In Several Locations In South Africa! A mysterious cylindrical UFO has been sighted in several cities in South Africa, including Thohoyandou, Pretoria, Sandton, Bloemfontein, Bethlehem, Soweto.
January 20, 2023 10:59:29
sticky:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, QRUSDVL. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10gxna5/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 9: Link posts must include a submission statement. > Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post). Submission statements may contain a summary or description of the content, why it is relevant to UFOs, the submitter's personal perspectives, or all of the above and must be at least 150 characters in length. If a statement is not added within thirty minutes of posting it will be removed. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 20, 2023 10:59:28
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, QRUSDVL. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10gxna5/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 9: Link posts must include a submission statement. > Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post). Submission statements may contain a summary or description of the content, why it is relevant to UFOs, the submitter's personal perspectives, or all of the above and must be at least 150 characters in length. If a statement is not added within thirty minutes of posting it will be removed. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 20, 2023 10:59:28
editflair:
flair_edit (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
new whistleblower law in effect
January 20, 2023 10:59:27
removelink:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
new whistleblower law in effect
January 20, 2023 10:59:16
sticky:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, DrMcLovin37. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10gzrxl/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 9: Link posts must include a submission statement. > Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post). Submission statements may contain a summary or description of the content, why it is relevant to UFOs, the submitter's personal perspectives, or all of the above and must be at least 150 characters in length. If a statement is not added within thirty minutes of posting it will be removed. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 20, 2023 10:59:16
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, DrMcLovin37. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10gzrxl/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 9: Link posts must include a submission statement. > Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post). Submission statements may contain a summary or description of the content, why it is relevant to UFOs, the submitter's personal perspectives, or all of the above and must be at least 150 characters in length. If a statement is not added within thirty minutes of posting it will be removed. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 20, 2023 10:59:15
editflair:
flair_edit (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
UFO flying over home. December 7th, 2022 at 6:09 in the afternoon. It was flying low enough that my iPhone could pick it up. Jupiter is on the left side in the video so someone can get an approximate size of the object. These objects fly over my home every night so it’s very common actually.
January 20, 2023 10:59:15
removelink:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
UFO flying over home. December 7th, 2022 at 6:09 in the afternoon. It was flying low enough that my iPhone could pick it up. Jupiter is on the left side in the video so someone can get an approximate size of the object. These objects fly over my home every night so it’s very common actually.
January 20, 2023 10:59:03
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
UFO sighting (pulsing blues) in rural Northern Territory of Australia
January 20, 2023 10:59:02
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
UFO sighting (pulsing blues) in rural Northern Territory of Australia
January 20, 2023 10:58:38
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Arthur C. Clarke on UFO's in his Childhood's End foreword added in 1989In 1989, Arthur C. Clarke added a foreword to his *Childhood's End* novel in which he talked about his new views, as shaped through the decades since the time of originally writing the book in 1953. Arthur C. Clarke confesses that at the time of writing the book, he was quite impressed by evidence of the 'paranormal', but that after four decades of research afterwards, he became an 'almost total skeptic'. In this foreword he mentions Uri Geller's scams and other fake demonstrations, but what I found most interesting, and wanted to share with this subreddit was his borderline hatred of ufology, as seen in his passage on UFO's: > Today, I would like to change the target of the disclaimer to cover 99 percent of the "paranormal" (it can't *all* be nonsense) and 100 percent of UFO "encounters". I would be greatly distressed if this book contributed still further to the seduction of the gullible, now cynically exploited by all the media. Book stores, news-stands and airwaves are all polluted with mind-rotting bilge about UFOs, psychic powers, astrology, pyramid energies, "channelling" - you name it, someone is peddling it in the final outburst of *fin de siècle* decadence...
January 20, 2023 10:58:37
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Arthur C. Clarke on UFO's in his Childhood's End foreword added in 1989In 1989, Arthur C. Clarke added a foreword to his *Childhood's End* novel in which he talked about his new views, as shaped through the decades since the time of originally writing the book in 1953. Arthur C. Clarke confesses that at the time of writing the book, he was quite impressed by evidence of the 'paranormal', but that after four decades of research afterwards, he became an 'almost total skeptic'. In this foreword he mentions Uri Geller's scams and other fake demonstrations, but what I found most interesting, and wanted to share with this subreddit was his borderline hatred of ufology, as seen in his passage on UFO's: > Today, I would like to change the target of the disclaimer to cover 99 percent of the "paranormal" (it can't *all* be nonsense) and 100 percent of UFO "encounters". I would be greatly distressed if this book contributed still further to the seduction of the gullible, now cynically exploited by all the media. Book stores, news-stands and airwaves are all polluted with mind-rotting bilge about UFOs, psychic powers, astrology, pyramid energies, "channelling" - you name it, someone is peddling it in the final outburst of *fin de siècle* decadence...
January 20, 2023 10:57:58
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Well he was a well-known pedophile, so who care what he thinks nowadays?
January 20, 2023 10:57:57
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Well he was a well-known pedophile, so who care what he thinks nowadays?
January 20, 2023 10:57:09
sticky:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, Objective-Class-4552. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10gmxw4/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 9: Link posts must include a submission statement. > Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post). Submission statements may contain a summary or description of the content, why it is relevant to UFOs, the submitter's personal perspectives, or all of the above and must be at least 150 characters in length. If a statement is not added within thirty minutes of posting it will be removed. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 20, 2023 10:57:09
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, Objective-Class-4552. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10gmxw4/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 9: Link posts must include a submission statement. > Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post). Submission statements may contain a summary or description of the content, why it is relevant to UFOs, the submitter's personal perspectives, or all of the above and must be at least 150 characters in length. If a statement is not added within thirty minutes of posting it will be removed. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 20, 2023 10:57:08
editflair:
flair_edit (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Alleged UFO / UAP ball seen from multiple perspectives
January 20, 2023 10:57:06
removelink:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Alleged UFO / UAP ball seen from multiple perspectives
January 20, 2023 10:56:56
sticky:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, Bmko8. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10gl7lk/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 9: Link posts must include a submission statement. > Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post). Submission statements may contain a summary or description of the content, why it is relevant to UFOs, the submitter's personal perspectives, or all of the above and must be at least 150 characters in length. If a statement is not added within thirty minutes of posting it will be removed. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 20, 2023 10:56:56
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, Bmko8. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10gl7lk/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 9: Link posts must include a submission statement. > Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post). Submission statements may contain a summary or description of the content, why it is relevant to UFOs, the submitter's personal perspectives, or all of the above and must be at least 150 characters in length. If a statement is not added within thirty minutes of posting it will be removed. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 20, 2023 10:56:55
editflair:
flair_edit (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Baton Rouge sightings 1.19.23
January 20, 2023 10:56:53
removelink:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Baton Rouge sightings 1.19.23
January 20, 2023 10:56:46
sticky:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, V1D_Hayha. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10gpuqt/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 9: Link posts must include a submission statement. > Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post). Submission statements may contain a summary or description of the content, why it is relevant to UFOs, the submitter's personal perspectives, or all of the above and must be at least 150 characters in length. If a statement is not added within thirty minutes of posting it will be removed. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 20, 2023 10:56:46
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, V1D_Hayha. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10gpuqt/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 9: Link posts must include a submission statement. > Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post). Submission statements may contain a summary or description of the content, why it is relevant to UFOs, the submitter's personal perspectives, or all of the above and must be at least 150 characters in length. If a statement is not added within thirty minutes of posting it will be removed. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 20, 2023 10:56:46
editflair:
flair_edit (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Found this in tiktok, thoughts?
January 20, 2023 10:56:44
removelink:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Found this in tiktok, thoughts?
January 20, 2023 10:56:02
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
This AGAIN? Does this sub even have mods? It’s birds. It’s still birds.
January 20, 2023 10:55:56
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Unidentified invisible flying object rises up and departs the battle scene @ 12 sec
January 20, 2023 10:55:55
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Unidentified invisible flying object rises up and departs the battle scene @ 12 sec
January 20, 2023 10:55:14
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
People keep saying this is birds. But birds AREN'T REAL! [https://birdsarentreal.com/](https://birdsarentreal.com/) Take that you doubters.
January 20, 2023 10:55:14
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
People keep saying this is birds. But birds AREN'T REAL! [https://birdsarentreal.com/](https://birdsarentreal.com/) Take that you doubters.
January 20, 2023 10:55:00
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Birds with their batteries dying. The gov took care of that during the pandemmy, no worries guys ✌🏾
January 20, 2023 10:54:59
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Birds with their batteries dying. The gov took care of that during the pandemmy, no worries guys ✌🏾
January 20, 2023 10:54:55
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, DudeManThing1983. Thanks for contributing. However, your [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10g7nxt/-/j548v77/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 1: Follow the Standards of Civility > * No trolling or being disruptive. > * No insults or personal attacks. > * No accusations that other users are shills. > * No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation. > * No harassment, threats, or advocating violence. > * No witch hunts or doxxing. (Please redact usernames when possible) > * You may attack each other's ideas, not each other. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 20, 2023 10:54:53
removecomment:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Fake as fuck. All of it. Even your friend is fake. This is some make believe fuckery.
January 20, 2023 10:54:50
wikirevise:
Page usernotes edited "create new note on new user DudeManThing1983" via toolbox (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
January 20, 2023 10:54:02
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
This AGAIN? Does this sub even have mods? It’s birds. It’s still birds.
January 20, 2023 10:54:02
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
This AGAIN? Does this sub even have mods? It’s birds. It’s still birds.
January 20, 2023 10:53:06
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
How to Report a Sighting
January 20, 2023 10:30:18
wikirevise:
Updated subreddit stylesheet (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
January 20, 2023 10:30:13
editsettings:
upload_image headerimg (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
January 20, 2023 10:29:40
community_styling:
added_styling secondary banner positioned image, banner positioned image, banner positioned image position, banner background image, banner background image position, banner background color, banner height, mobile banner image (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
January 20, 2023 10:25:44
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
How to Report a Sighting
January 20, 2023 10:25:17
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
We do use automod to filter specific, low-effort, one-word, top-level comments (e.g. 'ballon') already. There's still a lot of variance in how these can be presented and it requires regex to catch various versions of them. A minimum comment length is an idea we've considered and something we could propose at some point. Implementing restrictive rules to existing post formats is somewhat difficult, as there is a sub-set of users who characterize it as censorship or simply prefer there be the lowest barriers to entry for sighting posts. Another strategy is to create a new post type or flair which allows for higher-quality posts and then try to drive users towards it. We just launched the [Report post type](https://ufos.wiki/reports/) this month and will be experimenting with it going forward as an alternative to sighting posts. Basically, users will post using a template which will ensure they include a minimum amount of information related to their sighting and in a consistent format.
January 20, 2023 10:20:08
submit_scheduled_post:
scheduled for Fri, 20 Jan 2023 09:20 AM CST (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
How to Report a Sighting
January 20, 2023 10:20:08
sticky:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
How to Report a Sighting
January 20, 2023 10:20:08
unsticky:
replaced (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Weekly UFO Sightings: January 15 - January 21, 2023Welcome to our weekly UFO sightings thread. Share your footage, imagery, or other evidence of UFO sightings without worrying about our standard [posting guidelines](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/wiki/posting_guidelines). ​ When possible, please include the location and date/time of the sighting. ​ If you'd like to make your own post instead of commenting here, please check the [r/UFOs posting guidelines](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/wiki/posting_guidelines) first. ​ You can view [past Weekly Sighting posts here.](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/search?q=%22Weekly+UFO+Sightings%3A%22&restrict_sr=on&include_over_18=on&sort=new&t=all)
January 19, 2023 18:54:20
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Yes and that was in the morning around 8:30
January 19, 2023 18:54:16
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, MisterFistYourSister. Thanks for contributing. However, your [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10g7nxt/-/j52e2ml/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 1: Follow the Standards of Civility > * No trolling or being disruptive. > * No insults or personal attacks. > * No accusations that other users are shills. > * No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation. > * No harassment, threats, or advocating violence. > * No witch hunts or doxxing. (Please redact usernames when possible) > * You may attack each other's ideas, not each other. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 19, 2023 18:54:15
removecomment:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
This is not Norway, and that's the worst Photoshop I've ever seen. This entire post is dog shit and you should feel dumb, OP
January 19, 2023 18:54:13
wikirevise:
Page usernotes edited "create new note on user MisterFistYourSister" via toolbox (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
January 19, 2023 18:06:24
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
We have them filtered, meaning they're always held for moderator review. Any you see show up you can assume have been approved by a mod. This one is technically following the sub rules. There are many low-quality sighting posts similar to this which get posted, but the current bar is fairly low for these types of posts and a significant sub-set of users have indicated to us they would prefer it this way. My suggestion would be to: 1. Report anything you see which isn't actually following the sighting guidelines. 2. Downvote and move on. 3. Let us know how/why you would want us to change the rules on r/ufosmeta. 4. Apply to be a moderator and help us handle the onslaught.
January 19, 2023 18:01:52
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Mods should ban TikTok vids from being posted
January 19, 2023 18:01:52
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Mods should ban TikTok vids from being posted
January 19, 2023 17:32:46
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
> Unfortunately until I see more clear evidence I just can’t accept it’s any form of extra terrestrial tech/life. Agreed. All I or anyone else can say with certainty is that the phenomenon needs serous scientific study. The extra terrestrial tech/life is one of the least improbable and most easily understood theory as to what they really are. I am half convinced that these things will turn out to be not understandable to human intellect, in which case it would be better if we ignore them completely. > Also, a century?? The clips I’ve seen are from like 2004 and onwards. Are there other official military footages from before then? The phenomenon has been around longer than that. Check out the footage shot by the Sixty Minutes crew in New Zealand in the early seventies where a UFO they were filming did a figure 8 or an infinity sign in a single frame of the film.
January 19, 2023 17:31:32
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Juárez UFO was of 'nonhuman origin,' Mexico ufologist Jaime Maussan claims
January 19, 2023 17:31:31
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Juárez UFO was of 'nonhuman origin,' Mexico ufologist Jaime Maussan claims
January 19, 2023 17:31:16
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
A couple Cali UFOs
January 19, 2023 17:31:15
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
A couple Cali UFOs
January 19, 2023 17:31:04
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Could Christianity have spread with the help of the UFO phenomenon? I share an article that seems interesting to me about events such as the discovery of America that may have been influenced by the UFO phenomenon. Added some personal notes on the end. ​ # THE SCHEDULED CONQUEST 1992, by Andreas FABER-KAISER **Someone cares that the cross triumphs** The Spanish researcher Manuel Audije —something more than a Navy officer— supports the thesis that the phenomenon of the conquest of America is inexplicable considering the restricted possibilities of the Spanish invader, compared to the potential of the empires settled on the other side of the great sea. It was incomprehensible, he argues, that empires like the Aztec, of people accustomed to privations and struggles for subsistence for hundreds of years, would succumb to the push of a handful of men, even if they had those four-legged monsters that ran like the wind. . ​ But it is that someone, from above, was once again betting on the expansion of those who carried the sign of the cross. The history of human events, of the evolution of the human species, is surely written on terrestrial paper, but the pen that writes is often held by hands that are not human. Who the hell has an interest in us evolving in this or that way? And why the hell do academic historians close their eyes to this reality? Next I am going to transcribe literally some passages extracted from written chronicles referring to the conquest and colonization of the Americans. The chronicles selected for this article —there are many more— are not written by four ignorant or unknown, but by four renowned chroniclers of the history of Spain, who are Bernal Díaz del Castillo, Pedro de Valdivia, Fray Junípero Serra and Pedro de Cieza de Lion. **THE MEN WHO CAME FROM HEAVEN** But even before them, Columbus himself would allude to the fact that the American Indians seemed familiar with the idea that they could lower anthropomorphic figures from the heavens to the earth's surface. Thus, we read in his Diary of the first voyage, transcribed by Fray Bartolomé de las Casas, by the way and of course "In Nomine Domini Nostri Jesus Christi": "Sunday, October 14, 1492. (...) Others, when they saw that I was cured of going ashore, they jumped into the sea and came swimming, and we understood that they were asking us if we had come from heaven; and an old man came in the batel inside, and others with loud voices called all men and women: come and see the men who came from heaven: bring them food and drink." "Tuesday, November 6, 1492. (...) They said that they had received them with great solemnity according to their custom, and all men and women came to see them, and they settled them in the best houses, who touched them and kissed them. hands and feet, marveling and believing that they came from heaven." **THE INEVITABLE DEFEAT** Almost 30 years later, Cortés defeated the Indians, among other reasons, for three lucky coincidences for him (or not so lucky?) that marked the spirit of the indigenous with the very conviction of his inevitable defeat: Cortés's emblem was the cross, which for the Indian was the emblem of Quetzalcóatl, the serpent-god —bearer of feathers that denoted his ability to move through the air— descended instructor and returned to the stellar heights; Cortés's men were also white-skinned and bearded, like the gods referred to in Indian legends, and therefore Hernán Cortés landed in the year 1519, which was the year I Acatl, the year consecrated to Quetzalcóatl. For his part, the chronicler of Cortés, Bernal Díaz del Castillo, refers in his work Historia verdadera de la conquista de la Nueva España, in its chapter CI ('How the great Montezuma with many caciques and principals of the region gave obedience to his majesty, and other things that happened about it'): "And I will say that in the conversation that Montezuma had with all the caciques of all the land that he had sent to call, that after he had made a parliament without Cortés or any of us in front, except Orteguilla the page, they say that they He told them to look that from many years past they knew for certain, from what their ancestors had told them, it is so it has been indicated in their books of things of memories, that from where the Sun rises people were to come who were to rule these lands , and that he has understood, from what his gods have told him, that we are." In this way it is easy to conquer and win. Especially when, in addition, coinciding with the arrival of those who came from where the Sun rises, flying objects are planted in the air that confirm that they are the ones announced by the tradition of the ancients to take over the command of that area of ​​the planet. **UFOs DURING THE CONQUEST** This is how we read it in chapter CCXII from the book 'Of the signs and planets that were in the sky of New Spain before we entered it, and prognostic statements that the Mexican Indians made, saying about them and of a sign that was in the sky, and other things that are worth remembering´. Another quote from the same work by Bernal Díaz del Castillo: "The Mexican Indians said that there was a short time before we came to New Spain, that they saw a sign in the sky that was like green and red and round like a cart wheel"— The Spanish chronicler is using exactly the same expression that for this phenomenon that used the Italian historian Leone Cobelli for the object that flew over the town of Forli in August 1487, and the Chinese author of the work Notes on the Sky for the objects that flew over Dingchou on July 16 and 17 of the year the eastern regions of the empire of the sons of heaven— "*and next to the signal came another line and a path from where the Sun rises and came to join the red line; and Montezuma, great cacique of Mexico, ordered to call his popes and soothsayers, so that they could look at that thing and sign*." Later on, he continues: "*We never saw them, but by what Mexicans said, I put it here, because they have it that way in their paintings, which we found to be true. What I saw and all who wanted to see, in the year twenty-seven*" —1527— "*there was a sign from the sky at night in the form of a long sword, like between the province of Pánuco and the city of Tezcuco, and it did not move from the sky, to one side or the other, for more than twenty days*." Do the doctors of science, who like to attribute UFO sightings to unusual atmospheric phenomena and balloon probes (in the best of cases) want to explain to me what kind of unusual atmospheric phenomenon the presence of a sword shape is due to? long at a relatively low altitude (located between two specific geographical points in Mexico) and in a fixed position for more than twenty days? Because balloon-probes and satellite scrap in the 16th century, it doesn't strain. And meteorites in a fixed position, less. But do not close your eyes, because there is the testimony. Please a coherent response from the academic scientific community. If they have it, they also have the obligation to communicate it. And if they do not have it, they should have enough humility and scientific rigor to refrain from denying what they have not investigated. Therefore, I want to remember that this same aerial sword was what the historian Flavio Josefo already reported —above Jerusalem and fixed for a period of a whole year—, in addition to other historical cases in which forms of crosses (=swords) were seen. in the sky. ​ **ENIGMATIC APPEARANCES** But let's continue with the testimony of the Spanish chronicler Bernal Díaz del Castillo. In chapter XCIV ('How was the battle that the Mexican captains gave Juan de Escalante, and how they killed him and the horse and six other soldiers, and many Totonac Indian friends who also died there?), he recounts how the apparition of an enigmatic figure decides the victory in favor of the Spaniards (whom the Indians call 'teules'): "And Montezuma asked that, since they were many thousands of warriors, how did they not defeat so few teules? And they answered that their rods and arrows and good fighting were of no use; that they could not make them retract, because a great tecleciguata from Castile was coming before them, and that that lady put the Mexicans in fear, and said words to her teules that forced them, and Montezuma then believed that that great lady who was Santa María and the one we had told him was our lawyer, who from before We gave the great Montezuma with his precious Son in his arms." The case of the Virgin is not isolated, but other mysterious figures and fallen from heaven helped to convince the Indian that he had nothing to do against the invader. And, astonished reader!, that white knight who on a white steed passed through San Jorge in distant Europe, in the confrontations with the Moors, makes his appearance here again in support of the Christian crusade. Thus, Pedro de Valdivia from Extremadura recounts the following in a letter addressed to Carlos I of Spain and V of Germany, and referring to an attack by the natives against their fort established in what is now Chilean land, in the year 1541: "And our God seems to want to make use of its perpetuation so that his divine cult may be honored therein and the devil come out from where he has been venerated for so long; because according to what the native Indians say, that the day they came upon our fort, at the time When those on horseback charged at them, an old man on a white horse fell in the middle of his squadrons and told them: "Flee all of you, these Christians will kill you," and they were so frightened that they gave flee." "They said more: that three days before, after passing the Biubiu river to come upon us, a kite fell among them, one Saturday at noon, and from the fort where we were, many Christians saw it go there with a much greater brightness than other kites. to go out, and what a fall, a very beautiful lady came out of her, also dressed in white, and she said to them: 'I served the Christians, and you are not going against them, because they are very brave and they will kill you all.' And how she left The devil, their patron, came from among them and led them, telling them to assemble a very large crowd of people, and that he would come with them, because seeing so many of us together, we would fall dead of fear." With very slight variations in the form of exposition, this same story can be found in the list of facts and news that Pedro de Valdivia sends to his attorneys in Court. With great lucidity the chronicler says there, referring to the new land: "Our God seems to have it by his hand and to make use of us in the conquest and perpetuation of it." But, well, scholars of science, all this is nothing more than nonsense, a desire to tease Carlos I by those who were leaving their skin in America. How were the Indians going to see the same white horse descend before their noses that, tens of thousands of kilometers away, descended equally between Moors and Christians? But man, please don't be naive! How are white horses going to come down from heaven? Can't you see that this is impossible? Well, the history of Spain says that yes, they go down. And so it was for the Moors and the Indians. Because someone we don't know had the urgent need for the cross to dominate over part of the planet. ​ **THE PROGRAMMED CHRISTIANIZATION** And since we are talking about the cross, what better than a friar in America to continue explaining things that cannot be, but that were. Fray Junípero Serra founded one of his Christian missions in the Sierra de Santa Lucía, about a hundred kilometers from Monterrey. For this foundation, the missionaries had a curious help: that of an old indigenous woman, baptized later and who received the name of Agueda, who presented herself to the surprised missionaries asking them to administer the sacrament of baptism. Asked about the reasons that led her to this decision, the future Agueda began to tell this fantastic story: When she was still a child, she heard her parents mention that on a certain occasion two white men had arrived in that land whose clothing, according to the description that her parents had given her, was similar to that of the religious who had just arrived. . Furthermore, what those two men said was similar to what the new friars were preaching. There was only one difference between them: the two men who had arrived at least a hundred years before Fray Junípero had not done so on foot or on horseback, but had come flying: they fell from above, from the heights. They settled in the town and stayed there for some time. Not giving credit to their ears, the friars gathered as much information as they could among the other components of that group of indigenous people. Which led them to verify that that event remained alive in the memory of that town as part of its historical legacy. The establishment by the inhabitants of the town of a possible connection between the recently arrived missionaries and the two men who, according to references from their ancestors, had arrived flying, and whose memory was revitalized thanks to the story of the elderly Agueda, was a decisive factor for that all the members of that indigenous community request to receive baptism. Later on, Fray Junípero would witness another episode that leads us to think that there was prior preparation of the ground for when the opportune moment arrived. It turns out that on August 6, 1772, a small mixed group made up of Fray Pedro Cambón, Fray Angel Somera and ten soldiers, under the orders of Fray Junípero Serra, arrived at the Temblores River, after walking 40 leagues north from the city of San Diego, in northern California. Once the appropriate place was chosen to erect the cross that would preside over that place, and at the precise moment when they were about to nail it to the ground, a considerable number of indigenous people manifested their presence uttering shouts and threats. The situation was getting ugly for the small number of Christians, when one of the missionaries had an idea that would save their lives. On this occasion, his faith moved mountains (or what is the same, reduced the fierce natives to lambs). It occurred to the friar to take a picture of the Virgen de los Dolores from the scant luggage they were carrying, and expose it to the enemy. The result was absolutely surprising: the shouting and threatening gestures stopped abruptly. In silence, that group of natives was approaching the besieged group of men of arms and cross. One by one, the natives bowed, in an evident show of respect and submission, while they were depositing next to the painting all the valuables that adorned their bodies, in addition to their weapons, bows and arrows that moments before were wielding threateningly. What did the vision of this Virgin mean for those Indians? We do not know. But everything seems to indicate that they reacted to a previously induced stimulus in view of a similar image. **THE SHINING MAN** Certainly extrahuman help was lavished on American lands to those who bore the sign of the cross. Thus, Pedro de Cieza de León also writes in the 16th century, in chapter CXVII of La crónica del Perú, that the clergyman Marcos Otazo, a resident of Valladolid, narrated the following experience: "While I was in this town of Lampaz, one Thursday after supper a boy of mine who was sleeping in the church came to me, very frightened, begging me to get up and go baptize a cacique who was kneeling in the church in front of the images, very fearful and frightened; who being last night, which was Wednesday of Darkness, stuck in a guaca, which is where they worship, said he had seen a man dressed in white, who asked him what he was doing there with that stone statue. That he should leave immediately, and come for me to become a Christian. And when it was daylight I got up and said my hours, and not believing that it was so, I went to the church to say mass, and he said it. I found myself in the same way, kneeling, and when he saw me, he fell at my feet, begging me very much to turn him into a Christian, to which I replied that I would, and said mass, which some Christians who were there heard, and said, I baptized him, and he came out with great joy, shouting, saying that he was a Christian, and not bad, like the Indians." (...) "Many Indians became Christians because of the persuasions of this new convert. He told that the man he saw while in the guaca or temple of the devil was white and very beautiful, and that his clothes were also resplendent." It looks suspiciously like the two who, 16 centuries earlier, had entered — descended from heaven — into the tomb planned for Jesus. **MORE HEAVENLY HELP** Finally, in the CXIX chapter of the same Chronicle of Peru, Pedro Cieza de León writes: "When in Cuzco the Indians generally rose up against the Christians, there were no more than one hundred and eighty Spaniards on foot and horse. Well, Mango Inga being against them, with more than two hundred thousand Indians of war, and for a whole year, It is a great miracle to escape from the hands of the Indians, for some of them themselves affirm that they sometimes saw, when they were fighting with the Spaniards, that a celestial figure walked next to them that did great harm to them, and the Christians saw that the Indians they set fire to the city, which burned in many parts, and starting in the church, which was what the Indians wanted to see destroyed, they lit it three times, and so many times it went out of itself, according to the opinion of many that in Cuzco itself They informed me of this, being where they put the fire, dry straw without any mixture." **THE CONSTANT OF CELESTIAL PROTECTORS** Finally, I think it is interesting for the purpose of this article to add some cases of manifestations of superhuman beings in other latitudes of the planet, reported by chroniclers who had no connection with the American Indians. Thus, for example, an old narration from the island of Pohnpei in Micronesia tells of the following, on the occasion of the combat between the inhabitants of the Palikir region and those of Matolenim, on this tiny Pacific island: "In the heat of the fighting many of Palikir's men were also slain. Then they quickly raised prayers to a spirit named Sanoro. Their prayer found an echo in the spirit. For when they fell in the fight, the spirit quickly brought forth a woman among the fighters of Palikir. The woman was tremendously large. Then she spread her hair and covered the people of Palikir with it. As soon as the men of Matolenim saw the woman who had risen up among the Palikir men, their arms began to despite this, and they gazed in ecstasy without being able to move at the woman who was among the people of Palikir. Then Palikir's men rushed on those of Matolenim and killed them all." **ALSO IN EUROPE** And if amazing is the similarity of this superhuman figure that helps one of the two sides at the other end of the Pacific, with the superhuman appearances that we saw betting on one of the sides in the fights between Christians against Indians in America, no less amazing. It is the confirmation that far from the Pacific and America, in the middle of Europe, the same phenomenon was also lavished. Let's see some examples, although I insist that there are many more. ​ Let's go to the Mediterranean, where we will see the same phenomenon represented by the popular figure of Saint George, who belongs to the group of holy knights and soldiers who from heaven helped Christian believers in their struggles, especially when they fought the so-called infidels. . Among them we must count Saint Michael and Saint Magin, who both protected the interests of Charlemagne. The Catalan warriors, before undertaking any fight, entrusted themselves to Saint George, just as the warriors of Palikir entrusted themselves to Sanoro, and they obtained great protection —just like those—, particularly on occasions when they fought against the Muslims. ​ Thus, when the Arabs had conquered the city of Barcelona and it had been devastated, Count Borrell II reorganized in the nearby town of Manresa. With very meager forces he decides to return to Barcelona, ​​to attempt its practically impossible reconquest. But, upon arrival, they did not take long to notice a handsome warrior who galloped among the clouds and who wielded a thunderbolt as a weapon, with which he sowed death and terror among the Moors who fell by thousands or fled at full speed. After the mysterious knight, whom no one knew, disappeared, the men of Borrell II and the whole of Catalonia took him as their patron, and the cross that he wore on his clothing became part of the coat of arms of Barcelona and of many other cities and towns. ​ \--------------------------------- **Personal notes:** I find it interesting to also mention Vallee's comments about the phenomenon being communicated through symbols. It is striking that **Christopher Columbus** (anglicisation of Latin 'Christophorus Columbus') name of the discoverer of America means on the one hand **Christopher= "He who bears Christ" and on the other, Columbus = Dove.** Doves is a strong symbol that appears in Judaism, Christianity, Islam and paganism. ​ >God made me the messenger of the new heaven and the new earth...and he showed me the spot where to find it. Christopher Columbus, 1500, [https://www.jstor.org/stable/1860749](https://www.jstor.org/stable/1860749)
January 19, 2023 17:31:04
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Could Christianity have spread with the help of the UFO phenomenon? I share an article that seems interesting to me about events such as the discovery of America that may have been influenced by the UFO phenomenon. Added some personal notes on the end. ​ # THE SCHEDULED CONQUEST 1992, by Andreas FABER-KAISER **Someone cares that the cross triumphs** The Spanish researcher Manuel Audije —something more than a Navy officer— supports the thesis that the phenomenon of the conquest of America is inexplicable considering the restricted possibilities of the Spanish invader, compared to the potential of the empires settled on the other side of the great sea. It was incomprehensible, he argues, that empires like the Aztec, of people accustomed to privations and struggles for subsistence for hundreds of years, would succumb to the push of a handful of men, even if they had those four-legged monsters that ran like the wind. . ​ But it is that someone, from above, was once again betting on the expansion of those who carried the sign of the cross. The history of human events, of the evolution of the human species, is surely written on terrestrial paper, but the pen that writes is often held by hands that are not human. Who the hell has an interest in us evolving in this or that way? And why the hell do academic historians close their eyes to this reality? Next I am going to transcribe literally some passages extracted from written chronicles referring to the conquest and colonization of the Americans. The chronicles selected for this article —there are many more— are not written by four ignorant or unknown, but by four renowned chroniclers of the history of Spain, who are Bernal Díaz del Castillo, Pedro de Valdivia, Fray Junípero Serra and Pedro de Cieza de Lion. **THE MEN WHO CAME FROM HEAVEN** But even before them, Columbus himself would allude to the fact that the American Indians seemed familiar with the idea that they could lower anthropomorphic figures from the heavens to the earth's surface. Thus, we read in his Diary of the first voyage, transcribed by Fray Bartolomé de las Casas, by the way and of course "In Nomine Domini Nostri Jesus Christi": "Sunday, October 14, 1492. (...) Others, when they saw that I was cured of going ashore, they jumped into the sea and came swimming, and we understood that they were asking us if we had come from heaven; and an old man came in the batel inside, and others with loud voices called all men and women: come and see the men who came from heaven: bring them food and drink." "Tuesday, November 6, 1492. (...) They said that they had received them with great solemnity according to their custom, and all men and women came to see them, and they settled them in the best houses, who touched them and kissed them. hands and feet, marveling and believing that they came from heaven." **THE INEVITABLE DEFEAT** Almost 30 years later, Cortés defeated the Indians, among other reasons, for three lucky coincidences for him (or not so lucky?) that marked the spirit of the indigenous with the very conviction of his inevitable defeat: Cortés's emblem was the cross, which for the Indian was the emblem of Quetzalcóatl, the serpent-god —bearer of feathers that denoted his ability to move through the air— descended instructor and returned to the stellar heights; Cortés's men were also white-skinned and bearded, like the gods referred to in Indian legends, and therefore Hernán Cortés landed in the year 1519, which was the year I Acatl, the year consecrated to Quetzalcóatl. For his part, the chronicler of Cortés, Bernal Díaz del Castillo, refers in his work Historia verdadera de la conquista de la Nueva España, in its chapter CI ('How the great Montezuma with many caciques and principals of the region gave obedience to his majesty, and other things that happened about it'): "And I will say that in the conversation that Montezuma had with all the caciques of all the land that he had sent to call, that after he had made a parliament without Cortés or any of us in front, except Orteguilla the page, they say that they He told them to look that from many years past they knew for certain, from what their ancestors had told them, it is so it has been indicated in their books of things of memories, that from where the Sun rises people were to come who were to rule these lands , and that he has understood, from what his gods have told him, that we are." In this way it is easy to conquer and win. Especially when, in addition, coinciding with the arrival of those who came from where the Sun rises, flying objects are planted in the air that confirm that they are the ones announced by the tradition of the ancients to take over the command of that area of ​​the planet. **UFOs DURING THE CONQUEST** This is how we read it in chapter CCXII from the book 'Of the signs and planets that were in the sky of New Spain before we entered it, and prognostic statements that the Mexican Indians made, saying about them and of a sign that was in the sky, and other things that are worth remembering´. Another quote from the same work by Bernal Díaz del Castillo: "The Mexican Indians said that there was a short time before we came to New Spain, that they saw a sign in the sky that was like green and red and round like a cart wheel"— The Spanish chronicler is using exactly the same expression that for this phenomenon that used the Italian historian Leone Cobelli for the object that flew over the town of Forli in August 1487, and the Chinese author of the work Notes on the Sky for the objects that flew over Dingchou on July 16 and 17 of the year the eastern regions of the empire of the sons of heaven— "*and next to the signal came another line and a path from where the Sun rises and came to join the red line; and Montezuma, great cacique of Mexico, ordered to call his popes and soothsayers, so that they could look at that thing and sign*." Later on, he continues: "*We never saw them, but by what Mexicans said, I put it here, because they have it that way in their paintings, which we found to be true. What I saw and all who wanted to see, in the year twenty-seven*" —1527— "*there was a sign from the sky at night in the form of a long sword, like between the province of Pánuco and the city of Tezcuco, and it did not move from the sky, to one side or the other, for more than twenty days*." Do the doctors of science, who like to attribute UFO sightings to unusual atmospheric phenomena and balloon probes (in the best of cases) want to explain to me what kind of unusual atmospheric phenomenon the presence of a sword shape is due to? long at a relatively low altitude (located between two specific geographical points in Mexico) and in a fixed position for more than twenty days? Because balloon-probes and satellite scrap in the 16th century, it doesn't strain. And meteorites in a fixed position, less. But do not close your eyes, because there is the testimony. Please a coherent response from the academic scientific community. If they have it, they also have the obligation to communicate it. And if they do not have it, they should have enough humility and scientific rigor to refrain from denying what they have not investigated. Therefore, I want to remember that this same aerial sword was what the historian Flavio Josefo already reported —above Jerusalem and fixed for a period of a whole year—, in addition to other historical cases in which forms of crosses (=swords) were seen. in the sky. ​ **ENIGMATIC APPEARANCES** But let's continue with the testimony of the Spanish chronicler Bernal Díaz del Castillo. In chapter XCIV ('How was the battle that the Mexican captains gave Juan de Escalante, and how they killed him and the horse and six other soldiers, and many Totonac Indian friends who also died there?), he recounts how the apparition of an enigmatic figure decides the victory in favor of the Spaniards (whom the Indians call 'teules'): "And Montezuma asked that, since they were many thousands of warriors, how did they not defeat so few teules? And they answered that their rods and arrows and good fighting were of no use; that they could not make them retract, because a great tecleciguata from Castile was coming before them, and that that lady put the Mexicans in fear, and said words to her teules that forced them, and Montezuma then believed that that great lady who was Santa María and the one we had told him was our lawyer, who from before We gave the great Montezuma with his precious Son in his arms." The case of the Virgin is not isolated, but other mysterious figures and fallen from heaven helped to convince the Indian that he had nothing to do against the invader. And, astonished reader!, that white knight who on a white steed passed through San Jorge in distant Europe, in the confrontations with the Moors, makes his appearance here again in support of the Christian crusade. Thus, Pedro de Valdivia from Extremadura recounts the following in a letter addressed to Carlos I of Spain and V of Germany, and referring to an attack by the natives against their fort established in what is now Chilean land, in the year 1541: "And our God seems to want to make use of its perpetuation so that his divine cult may be honored therein and the devil come out from where he has been venerated for so long; because according to what the native Indians say, that the day they came upon our fort, at the time When those on horseback charged at them, an old man on a white horse fell in the middle of his squadrons and told them: "Flee all of you, these Christians will kill you," and they were so frightened that they gave flee." "They said more: that three days before, after passing the Biubiu river to come upon us, a kite fell among them, one Saturday at noon, and from the fort where we were, many Christians saw it go there with a much greater brightness than other kites. to go out, and what a fall, a very beautiful lady came out of her, also dressed in white, and she said to them: 'I served the Christians, and you are not going against them, because they are very brave and they will kill you all.' And how she left The devil, their patron, came from among them and led them, telling them to assemble a very large crowd of people, and that he would come with them, because seeing so many of us together, we would fall dead of fear." With very slight variations in the form of exposition, this same story can be found in the list of facts and news that Pedro de Valdivia sends to his attorneys in Court. With great lucidity the chronicler says there, referring to the new land: "Our God seems to have it by his hand and to make use of us in the conquest and perpetuation of it." But, well, scholars of science, all this is nothing more than nonsense, a desire to tease Carlos I by those who were leaving their skin in America. How were the Indians going to see the same white horse descend before their noses that, tens of thousands of kilometers away, descended equally between Moors and Christians? But man, please don't be naive! How are white horses going to come down from heaven? Can't you see that this is impossible? Well, the history of Spain says that yes, they go down. And so it was for the Moors and the Indians. Because someone we don't know had the urgent need for the cross to dominate over part of the planet. ​ **THE PROGRAMMED CHRISTIANIZATION** And since we are talking about the cross, what better than a friar in America to continue explaining things that cannot be, but that were. Fray Junípero Serra founded one of his Christian missions in the Sierra de Santa Lucía, about a hundred kilometers from Monterrey. For this foundation, the missionaries had a curious help: that of an old indigenous woman, baptized later and who received the name of Agueda, who presented herself to the surprised missionaries asking them to administer the sacrament of baptism. Asked about the reasons that led her to this decision, the future Agueda began to tell this fantastic story: When she was still a child, she heard her parents mention that on a certain occasion two white men had arrived in that land whose clothing, according to the description that her parents had given her, was similar to that of the religious who had just arrived. . Furthermore, what those two men said was similar to what the new friars were preaching. There was only one difference between them: the two men who had arrived at least a hundred years before Fray Junípero had not done so on foot or on horseback, but had come flying: they fell from above, from the heights. They settled in the town and stayed there for some time. Not giving credit to their ears, the friars gathered as much information as they could among the other components of that group of indigenous people. Which led them to verify that that event remained alive in the memory of that town as part of its historical legacy. The establishment by the inhabitants of the town of a possible connection between the recently arrived missionaries and the two men who, according to references from their ancestors, had arrived flying, and whose memory was revitalized thanks to the story of the elderly Agueda, was a decisive factor for that all the members of that indigenous community request to receive baptism. Later on, Fray Junípero would witness another episode that leads us to think that there was prior preparation of the ground for when the opportune moment arrived. It turns out that on August 6, 1772, a small mixed group made up of Fray Pedro Cambón, Fray Angel Somera and ten soldiers, under the orders of Fray Junípero Serra, arrived at the Temblores River, after walking 40 leagues north from the city of San Diego, in northern California. Once the appropriate place was chosen to erect the cross that would preside over that place, and at the precise moment when they were about to nail it to the ground, a considerable number of indigenous people manifested their presence uttering shouts and threats. The situation was getting ugly for the small number of Christians, when one of the missionaries had an idea that would save their lives. On this occasion, his faith moved mountains (or what is the same, reduced the fierce natives to lambs). It occurred to the friar to take a picture of the Virgen de los Dolores from the scant luggage they were carrying, and expose it to the enemy. The result was absolutely surprising: the shouting and threatening gestures stopped abruptly. In silence, that group of natives was approaching the besieged group of men of arms and cross. One by one, the natives bowed, in an evident show of respect and submission, while they were depositing next to the painting all the valuables that adorned their bodies, in addition to their weapons, bows and arrows that moments before were wielding threateningly. What did the vision of this Virgin mean for those Indians? We do not know. But everything seems to indicate that they reacted to a previously induced stimulus in view of a similar image. **THE SHINING MAN** Certainly extrahuman help was lavished on American lands to those who bore the sign of the cross. Thus, Pedro de Cieza de León also writes in the 16th century, in chapter CXVII of La crónica del Perú, that the clergyman Marcos Otazo, a resident of Valladolid, narrated the following experience: "While I was in this town of Lampaz, one Thursday after supper a boy of mine who was sleeping in the church came to me, very frightened, begging me to get up and go baptize a cacique who was kneeling in the church in front of the images, very fearful and frightened; who being last night, which was Wednesday of Darkness, stuck in a guaca, which is where they worship, said he had seen a man dressed in white, who asked him what he was doing there with that stone statue. That he should leave immediately, and come for me to become a Christian. And when it was daylight I got up and said my hours, and not believing that it was so, I went to the church to say mass, and he said it. I found myself in the same way, kneeling, and when he saw me, he fell at my feet, begging me very much to turn him into a Christian, to which I replied that I would, and said mass, which some Christians who were there heard, and said, I baptized him, and he came out with great joy, shouting, saying that he was a Christian, and not bad, like the Indians." (...) "Many Indians became Christians because of the persuasions of this new convert. He told that the man he saw while in the guaca or temple of the devil was white and very beautiful, and that his clothes were also resplendent." It looks suspiciously like the two who, 16 centuries earlier, had entered — descended from heaven — into the tomb planned for Jesus. **MORE HEAVENLY HELP** Finally, in the CXIX chapter of the same Chronicle of Peru, Pedro Cieza de León writes: "When in Cuzco the Indians generally rose up against the Christians, there were no more than one hundred and eighty Spaniards on foot and horse. Well, Mango Inga being against them, with more than two hundred thousand Indians of war, and for a whole year, It is a great miracle to escape from the hands of the Indians, for some of them themselves affirm that they sometimes saw, when they were fighting with the Spaniards, that a celestial figure walked next to them that did great harm to them, and the Christians saw that the Indians they set fire to the city, which burned in many parts, and starting in the church, which was what the Indians wanted to see destroyed, they lit it three times, and so many times it went out of itself, according to the opinion of many that in Cuzco itself They informed me of this, being where they put the fire, dry straw without any mixture." **THE CONSTANT OF CELESTIAL PROTECTORS** Finally, I think it is interesting for the purpose of this article to add some cases of manifestations of superhuman beings in other latitudes of the planet, reported by chroniclers who had no connection with the American Indians. Thus, for example, an old narration from the island of Pohnpei in Micronesia tells of the following, on the occasion of the combat between the inhabitants of the Palikir region and those of Matolenim, on this tiny Pacific island: "In the heat of the fighting many of Palikir's men were also slain. Then they quickly raised prayers to a spirit named Sanoro. Their prayer found an echo in the spirit. For when they fell in the fight, the spirit quickly brought forth a woman among the fighters of Palikir. The woman was tremendously large. Then she spread her hair and covered the people of Palikir with it. As soon as the men of Matolenim saw the woman who had risen up among the Palikir men, their arms began to despite this, and they gazed in ecstasy without being able to move at the woman who was among the people of Palikir. Then Palikir's men rushed on those of Matolenim and killed them all." **ALSO IN EUROPE** And if amazing is the similarity of this superhuman figure that helps one of the two sides at the other end of the Pacific, with the superhuman appearances that we saw betting on one of the sides in the fights between Christians against Indians in America, no less amazing. It is the confirmation that far from the Pacific and America, in the middle of Europe, the same phenomenon was also lavished. Let's see some examples, although I insist that there are many more. ​ Let's go to the Mediterranean, where we will see the same phenomenon represented by the popular figure of Saint George, who belongs to the group of holy knights and soldiers who from heaven helped Christian believers in their struggles, especially when they fought the so-called infidels. . Among them we must count Saint Michael and Saint Magin, who both protected the interests of Charlemagne. The Catalan warriors, before undertaking any fight, entrusted themselves to Saint George, just as the warriors of Palikir entrusted themselves to Sanoro, and they obtained great protection —just like those—, particularly on occasions when they fought against the Muslims. ​ Thus, when the Arabs had conquered the city of Barcelona and it had been devastated, Count Borrell II reorganized in the nearby town of Manresa. With very meager forces he decides to return to Barcelona, ​​to attempt its practically impossible reconquest. But, upon arrival, they did not take long to notice a handsome warrior who galloped among the clouds and who wielded a thunderbolt as a weapon, with which he sowed death and terror among the Moors who fell by thousands or fled at full speed. After the mysterious knight, whom no one knew, disappeared, the men of Borrell II and the whole of Catalonia took him as their patron, and the cross that he wore on his clothing became part of the coat of arms of Barcelona and of many other cities and towns. ​ \--------------------------------- **Personal notes:** I find it interesting to also mention Vallee's comments about the phenomenon being communicated through symbols. It is striking that **Christopher Columbus** (anglicisation of Latin 'Christophorus Columbus') name of the discoverer of America means on the one hand **Christopher= "He who bears Christ" and on the other, Columbus = Dove.** Doves is a strong symbol that appears in Judaism, Christianity, Islam and paganism. ​ >God made me the messenger of the new heaven and the new earth...and he showed me the spot where to find it. Christopher Columbus, 1500, [https://www.jstor.org/stable/1860749](https://www.jstor.org/stable/1860749)
January 19, 2023 17:29:17
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Even better is to literally not care. This sub proved what a joke it was late last year with the now infamous "streetlight UFO debunking" thread which had the highest number of upvotes in history. Something like 17K last time I checked. The mods of this sub are complicit as well. Reddit is trolled by the cousins of COINTEL Pro and only the low level agents who aren't good enough to do field work troll this place so they take their butt hurt anger out on everyone here by continuing to propagate what the CIA started with the Warren Commission report when everyone called them on their bullshit which is when they came up with the phrase "conspiracy theorist". This shit (the psyop) is as old as the UFO topic. Ridicule and deride those who know so the sheep are easily swayed. Imagine spending your life working to get a respected role in the FBI or one of the intel agencies and sucking so bad you get assigned to UFO debunker duty. lol...just goes to show even in the intel community someone always finishes last in their class.
January 19, 2023 17:29:16
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Even better is to literally not care. This sub proved what a joke it was late last year with the now infamous "streetlight UFO debunking" thread which had the highest number of upvotes in history. Something like 17K last time I checked. The mods of this sub are complicit as well. Reddit is trolled by the cousins of COINTEL Pro and only the low level agents who aren't good enough to do field work troll this place so they take their butt hurt anger out on everyone here by continuing to propagate what the CIA started with the Warren Commission report when everyone called them on their bullshit which is when they came up with the phrase "conspiracy theorist". This shit (the psyop) is as old as the UFO topic. Ridicule and deride those who know so the sheep are easily swayed. Imagine spending your life working to get a respected role in the FBI or one of the intel agencies and sucking so bad you get assigned to UFO debunker duty. lol...just goes to show even in the intel community someone always finishes last in their class.
January 19, 2023 17:28:35
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
In some of your stills it almost looks like a number 3 mylar balloon. The reflectivity of mylar would explain the brightness. Aircraft or high altitude balloons don't normally reflect this much light. Thank you for putting so much detail in your post.
January 19, 2023 17:28:35
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
In some of your stills it almost looks like a number 3 mylar balloon. The reflectivity of mylar would explain the brightness. Aircraft or high altitude balloons don't normally reflect this much light. Thank you for putting so much detail in your post.
January 19, 2023 17:28:16
sticky:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, Greedy-Creme-995. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10gahej/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 9: Link posts must include a submission statement. > Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post). Submission statements may contain a summary or description of the content, why it is relevant to UFOs, the submitter's personal perspectives, or all of the above and must be at least 150 characters in length. If a statement is not added within thirty minutes of posting it will be removed. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 19, 2023 17:28:16
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, Greedy-Creme-995. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10gahej/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 9: Link posts must include a submission statement. > Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post). Submission statements may contain a summary or description of the content, why it is relevant to UFOs, the submitter's personal perspectives, or all of the above and must be at least 150 characters in length. If a statement is not added within thirty minutes of posting it will be removed. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 19, 2023 17:28:16
editflair:
flair_edit (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Why is no one talking about this? Multiple videos!
January 19, 2023 17:28:11
removelink:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Why is no one talking about this? Multiple videos!
January 19, 2023 17:27:52
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
I got nothing else to tell you brother
January 19, 2023 17:27:50
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Debunkers come when they're called 🐕
January 19, 2023 17:27:37
sticky:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, Pennsyltucky_Gentry. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10gcev8/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 2: This subreddit is specifically for the discussion of Unidentified Flying Objects. Please post other topics to their appropriate subreddits. Anything that primarily focuses on the hypothetical occupants of UFOs (aliens, other beings, etc), rather than the UFOs themselves, must relate to a specific sighting(s). Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 19, 2023 17:27:36
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, Pennsyltucky_Gentry. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10gcev8/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 2: This subreddit is specifically for the discussion of Unidentified Flying Objects. Please post other topics to their appropriate subreddits. Anything that primarily focuses on the hypothetical occupants of UFOs (aliens, other beings, etc), rather than the UFOs themselves, must relate to a specific sighting(s). Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 19, 2023 17:27:36
editflair:
flair_edit (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Is a full-color high-resolution version of the AARO shield available?
January 19, 2023 17:27:35
removelink:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Is a full-color high-resolution version of the AARO shield available?
January 19, 2023 17:27:21
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
I saw something strange In Glasgow on Tuesday morning, seen an object shaped like an octopus and entirely black like oil
January 19, 2023 17:27:13
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Follow the Standards of Civility: No trolling or being disruptive. No insults or personal attacks. No accusations that other users are shills. No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation. No harassment, threats, or advocating violence. No witch hunts or doxxing. (Please redact usernames when possible) You may attack each other's ideas, not each other.
January 19, 2023 17:27:12
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Follow the Standards of Civility: No trolling or being disruptive. No insults or personal attacks. No accusations that other users are shills. No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation. No harassment, threats, or advocating violence. No witch hunts or doxxing. (Please redact usernames when possible) You may attack each other's ideas, not each other.
January 19, 2023 17:27:09
spamcomment:
spam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Follow the Standards of Civility: No trolling or being disruptive. No insults or personal attacks. No accusations that other users are shills. No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation. No harassment, threats, or advocating violence. No witch hunts or doxxing. (Please redact usernames when possible) You may attack each other's ideas, not each other.
January 19, 2023 17:21:11
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
I'm in agreement with darkestsoul's reply. I think these beings were performing some type of behavioral experiment. It reminds me of a 1989 report from Russia. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYcRrokpsaE https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/vida_alien/esp_vida_alien_30.htm These beings asked the driver for fire, which he provided. This encounter had far more happening than that though. He entered their craft as well. These beings seemed to be interested in human behavior like in this "pancake" incident and even enquired about the watch he wore not being made in Russia. IMO these beings are looking to see if humanity is becoming less divided and violent and perform random spot checks.
January 19, 2023 17:20:50
sticky:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, VsVsVs205. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10gel5q/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. - Must include approximate Location and Date/Time Recorded - Must be related to a detailed and descriptive eyewitness account (can be anonymous) - No trail camera or doorbell camera footage - Must include a picture or video AND have been seen with eyeballs (No “Look what I found when I looked back at my pictures!”) - No cell phone videos of content on a TV/display. Interviews, podcasts, documentaries, and articles related to UFOs can still be shared and will not be subject to these posting guidelines. There is a weekly thread for people to share their stories, pictures and videos that do not meet the above criteria. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 19, 2023 17:20:50
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, VsVsVs205. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10gel5q/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. - Must include approximate Location and Date/Time Recorded - Must be related to a detailed and descriptive eyewitness account (can be anonymous) - No trail camera or doorbell camera footage - Must include a picture or video AND have been seen with eyeballs (No “Look what I found when I looked back at my pictures!”) - No cell phone videos of content on a TV/display. Interviews, podcasts, documentaries, and articles related to UFOs can still be shared and will not be subject to these posting guidelines. There is a weekly thread for people to share their stories, pictures and videos that do not meet the above criteria. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 19, 2023 17:20:49
editflair:
flair_edit (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Morphing orange orbsLast year I saw 2 morphing orange orbs at around 5am by morphing I mean it started off as 1 and turned into 2 it started floating around in the same spot and just going in and out of each other it was out of this world and incredible then just disappeared I honestly wasn’t scared just amazed and no one believed me, it’s been too on my mind so I’m here to see if anyone else has saw it and have a rough idea on what they think it is and I don’t want no classic “weather balloon” from u bots this wasn’t from here. I’ve saw 1 or 2 videos that is exactly what I saw but I still think it’s probably one of the rarest/legit sightings. If you’ve seen this you know what I’m talking about, please speak out.
January 19, 2023 17:20:36
removelink:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Morphing orange orbsLast year I saw 2 morphing orange orbs at around 5am by morphing I mean it started off as 1 and turned into 2 it started floating around in the same spot and just going in and out of each other it was out of this world and incredible then just disappeared I honestly wasn’t scared just amazed and no one believed me, it’s been too on my mind so I’m here to see if anyone else has saw it and have a rough idea on what they think it is and I don’t want no classic “weather balloon” from u bots this wasn’t from here. I’ve saw 1 or 2 videos that is exactly what I saw but I still think it’s probably one of the rarest/legit sightings. If you’ve seen this you know what I’m talking about, please speak out.
January 19, 2023 08:08:02
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
On July 19, 1952, a bizarre incident occurred in the skies over Washington, D.C. Air traffic controllers watched as UFOs materialized on their radar screens and flew over the White House and the Capitol. Even Albert Einstein decided to write a letter about the incident.
January 19, 2023 08:08:02
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
On July 19, 1952, a bizarre incident occurred in the skies over Washington, D.C. Air traffic controllers watched as UFOs materialized on their radar screens and flew over the White House and the Capitol. Even Albert Einstein decided to write a letter about the incident.
January 19, 2023 08:07:50
wikirevise:
Page usernotes edited "create new note on new user ConsiderationFun4301" via toolbox (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
January 19, 2023 08:07:40
sticky:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, ConsiderationFun4301. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10g06wy/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 2: This subreddit is specifically for the discussion of Unidentified Flying Objects. Please post other topics to their appropriate subreddits. Anything that primarily focuses on the hypothetical occupants of UFOs (aliens, other beings, etc), rather than the UFOs themselves, must relate to a specific sighting(s). Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 19, 2023 08:07:40
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, ConsiderationFun4301. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10g06wy/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 2: This subreddit is specifically for the discussion of Unidentified Flying Objects. Please post other topics to their appropriate subreddits. Anything that primarily focuses on the hypothetical occupants of UFOs (aliens, other beings, etc), rather than the UFOs themselves, must relate to a specific sighting(s). Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 19, 2023 08:07:40
removelink:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
We blew ourselves up once, why would aliens try to help a second time ?At this point I conclude (because I am Ufologist obviously) maybe the reason aliens don’t wanna come down is because they have done this bullshit before , and humans being humans, we fuck shit up eventually. As for “blowing ourselves up”, I truly believe that statement is true. I understand it is fringe archeology to think of Atlantis or some other mythical landmass, but it’s not out of place to think of a place that had been forced to collapse to due a natural disaster. I started a Reddit forum btw for people to drop locations worth exploring as well. R/Anexpedition
January 19, 2023 08:07:39
editflair:
flair_edit (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
We blew ourselves up once, why would aliens try to help a second time ?At this point I conclude (because I am Ufologist obviously) maybe the reason aliens don’t wanna come down is because they have done this bullshit before , and humans being humans, we fuck shit up eventually. As for “blowing ourselves up”, I truly believe that statement is true. I understand it is fringe archeology to think of Atlantis or some other mythical landmass, but it’s not out of place to think of a place that had been forced to collapse to due a natural disaster. I started a Reddit forum btw for people to drop locations worth exploring as well. R/Anexpedition
January 19, 2023 08:07:27
approvelink:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
We blew ourselves up once, why would aliens try to help a second time ?At this point I conclude (because I am Ufologist obviously) maybe the reason aliens don’t wanna come down is because they have done this bullshit before , and humans being humans, we fuck shit up eventually. As for “blowing ourselves up”, I truly believe that statement is true. I understand it is fringe archeology to think of Atlantis or some other mythical landmass, but it’s not out of place to think of a place that had been forced to collapse to due a natural disaster. I started a Reddit forum btw for people to drop locations worth exploring as well. R/Anexpedition
January 19, 2023 08:07:19
removelink:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
We blew ourselves up once, why would aliens try to help a second time ?At this point I conclude (because I am Ufologist obviously) maybe the reason aliens don’t wanna come down is because they have done this bullshit before , and humans being humans, we fuck shit up eventually. As for “blowing ourselves up”, I truly believe that statement is true. I understand it is fringe archeology to think of Atlantis or some other mythical landmass, but it’s not out of place to think of a place that had been forced to collapse to due a natural disaster. I started a Reddit forum btw for people to drop locations worth exploring as well. R/Anexpedition
January 19, 2023 08:07:06
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Has anyone seen this footage yet? Debunked or still UAP?
January 19, 2023 08:07:06
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Has anyone seen this footage yet? Debunked or still UAP?
January 19, 2023 08:05:26
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
This. The only reason there are so many observed all the time by our navy, in my mind could be they are patrolling as well. Keeping us safe from another ET power. Who knows. But interesting that they would bring each other down.
January 19, 2023 07:52:53
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Members don't necessarily equate to users who make posts or leave comments. I sub to r/AskHistorians, for example, but never expect to post or make a single comment due to the general requirements. It's also hard to make comparisions because we can't easily see how many posts/comments they're removing each day and how many mod actions are being taken per mod or overall. We can see they end up having only a [1/4 of the comments](https://subredditstats.com/r/askhistorians) r/UFOs [gets per day.](https://subredditstats.com/r/UFOs). It [looks like they remove](https://www.reveddit.com/v/askhistorians/?localSort=num_comments) slightly more posts than we do [on average in r/UFOs](https://www.reveddit.com/v/UFOs/?localSort=num_comments). Although, there are automated and manual mechanism which lead to post removals. Some our are automated via u/StatementBot. My general impression is they have a generally more focused format (just questions directed at historians) and a much more active and passionate group of moderators. That isn't something that necessarily translates to all subreddits or teams of moderators. Culture of moderation also plays a large factor and is largely invisible to users, much less something which can be easily adjusted to improved. I can say the moderation culture here has improved significantly over the past year, but mostly in incremental ways and amidst ongoing challenges.
January 19, 2023 06:55:09
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
About the Varginha Incident.Really, though ?! The poorly told story of the damn thing... after studying the subject a lot and exhaustively, I can say one thing, I don't know if it was really an alien, a laboratory experiment that escaped, a new species of animal, but the fact is, something very important, something of worldwide relevance happened for some reason in Varginha on January 20th, 1996. Now, what exactly it was, is up to each person to believe, but simply saying that NOTHING happened, is turning a blind eye to the reality of the facts. In the absence of evidence, just watch the interview with the Major there, where he talks about dwarves and "creature" yes, he uses the word "creature" and see if that doesn't leave you with a lingering doubt. The fact is, something went down, but what exactly it was, we probably will never know.
January 19, 2023 06:55:09
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
About the Varginha Incident.Really, though ?! The poorly told story of the damn thing... after studying the subject a lot and exhaustively, I can say one thing, I don't know if it was really an alien, a laboratory experiment that escaped, a new species of animal, but the fact is, something very important, something of worldwide relevance happened for some reason in Varginha on January 20th, 1996. Now, what exactly it was, is up to each person to believe, but simply saying that NOTHING happened, is turning a blind eye to the reality of the facts. In the absence of evidence, just watch the interview with the Major there, where he talks about dwarves and "creature" yes, he uses the word "creature" and see if that doesn't leave you with a lingering doubt. The fact is, something went down, but what exactly it was, we probably will never know.
January 19, 2023 06:54:44
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Garry Nolan has revealed he's lurking on reddit. Let's give him a warm welcomeOn the first episode of the Merged podcast, Garry has mentioned several times that he's recently been visiting reddit, specifically on the topic of ufology. Assuming that he's looking at this subreddit since it's the most active UFO subreddit, I think we should give Garry a warm welcome and let him know his efforts are not going unappreciated. One can hope that maybe he'll even engage with the community, which could lead to some interesting discussions. (And no, I'm not Garry Nolan)
January 19, 2023 06:54:44
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Garry Nolan has revealed he's lurking on reddit. Let's give him a warm welcomeOn the first episode of the Merged podcast, Garry has mentioned several times that he's recently been visiting reddit, specifically on the topic of ufology. Assuming that he's looking at this subreddit since it's the most active UFO subreddit, I think we should give Garry a warm welcome and let him know his efforts are not going unappreciated. One can hope that maybe he'll even engage with the community, which could lead to some interesting discussions. (And no, I'm not Garry Nolan)
January 19, 2023 06:54:42
approvelink:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Sighting Glasgow, ScotlandI was driving back home from Glasgow on Tuesday 17th Jan. I thought I was looking at a planet in the night sky whilst stopped at traffic lights when I noticed it was moving towards me. It was an Orange orb that looked to be emitting light from all areas of the object (no singular lights). I rolled down the window to see if I could hear anything, which I could not as the object travelled overhead and I finally lost sight as it went over my car. I estimate the object to be at an altitude of 1800ft to 2400ft as it was travelling through the clouds, wind speed was 1w m/s from the North West, the object was travelling east. I was think is it a satellite or a Chinese lantern as I drove on but as I stopped at another set of lights 1/2 of a mile away the object appeared at rapid speed from the West to East and slowed down instantly. This is when I seen the orb, this time with a rectangular strip of red light at the front travelling through the clouds at the same speed as before. The confirmation of the height for me was that the red light was illuminating the condensation of the lighter area of clouds around it. Now I start to think this is not a lantern or a drone. I lose site again as I start to drive and the object travels overhead. I travel South West on the motorway and 7 miles away from the first sightings I am amazed to see the orange orb once again, travelling from North to South and stopping over the motorway. It sat stationary until I drove below the object and I lost sight as it was above me, that was the last I saw of it. I have no idea what it was, but it wasn't a Helicopter or a plane. Absolutely no noise from the object what so ever and completely surrounded by and orange colour the same shade as the setting Sun.
January 19, 2023 04:26:42
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
I know you probably think it's alien 'something' and i agree with you i wanna see their technologies!!!!
January 19, 2023 04:26:41
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
I posted this a while ago and I was told it’s a balloon or something. With recent videos of spherical crafts I wanted to post this again. It was a metal ball floating in the air. It just disappears. Some kind of cloaking tech? Not sure
January 19, 2023 04:26:24
sticky:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, Syfing. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10fx5cz/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 3: No low effort posts or comments. Low Effort implies content which is low effort to consume, not low effort to produce. This generally includes: > * Memes, jokes, cartoons, and art (art is only allowed if it's depicting a real event). > * Tweets and screenshots of posts or comments from social media without significant relevance. > * Incredible claims unsupported by evidence. > * Shower thoughts. > * One-to-three word comments or emojis. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 19, 2023 04:26:24
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, Syfing. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10fx5cz/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 3: No low effort posts or comments. Low Effort implies content which is low effort to consume, not low effort to produce. This generally includes: > * Memes, jokes, cartoons, and art (art is only allowed if it's depicting a real event). > * Tweets and screenshots of posts or comments from social media without significant relevance. > * Incredible claims unsupported by evidence. > * Shower thoughts. > * One-to-three word comments or emojis. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 19, 2023 04:26:24
editflair:
flair_edit (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hmmmmm
January 19, 2023 04:26:21
removelink:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hmmmmm
January 19, 2023 04:26:15
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Again, seethe and cope. Perhaps you should remove yourself from the bridge deck Admiral and retire to your cabin. This ship's in good hands.
January 19, 2023 04:26:15
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Again, seethe and cope. Perhaps you should remove yourself from the bridge deck Admiral and retire to your cabin. This ship's in good hands.
January 19, 2023 04:02:48
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
My brother just sent me a compilation of all the videos on someone’s TikTok feed. They all appear to be similarly shaped spheres, some black and some white. I don’t have TikTok so I can’t access the comments. Edit: I just posted the [compilation](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10fwd1f/spherical_ufo_compilation_from_tiktok/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf) to the page. Edit 2: Mods removed my post, so here’s the [video](https://www.reddit.com/user/IronNinjaRaptor/comments/10fx097/spherical_ufo_compilation_from_tiktok/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf) on my profile.
January 19, 2023 04:02:47
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
My brother just sent me a compilation of all the videos on someone’s TikTok feed. They all appear to be similarly shaped spheres, some black and some white. I don’t have TikTok so I can’t access the comments. Edit: I just posted the [compilation](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10fwd1f/spherical_ufo_compilation_from_tiktok/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf) to the page. Edit 2: Mods removed my post, so here’s the [video](https://www.reddit.com/user/IronNinjaRaptor/comments/10fx097/spherical_ufo_compilation_from_tiktok/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf) on my profile.
January 19, 2023 04:02:33
sticky:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, ribblle. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10fwgwq/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 2: This subreddit is specifically for the discussion of Unidentified Flying Objects. Please post other topics to their appropriate subreddits. Anything that primarily focuses on the hypothetical occupants of UFOs (aliens, other beings, etc), rather than the UFOs themselves, must relate to a specific sighting(s). Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 19, 2023 04:02:33
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, ribblle. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10fwgwq/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 2: This subreddit is specifically for the discussion of Unidentified Flying Objects. Please post other topics to their appropriate subreddits. Anything that primarily focuses on the hypothetical occupants of UFOs (aliens, other beings, etc), rather than the UFOs themselves, must relate to a specific sighting(s). Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 19, 2023 04:02:33
editflair:
flair_edit (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Given the evidence of unreasonably advanced machining efforts in the earliest era of Ancient Egypt, could this suggest something about UFO's?[Podcast format (Joe Rogan Experience)](https://open.spotify.com/episode/7x3uLeqyCHIPkaDtoXnV24?si=76d6e7e1191b4974): Starting 41:59 [Youtube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K80JebExyEY&ab_channel=UnchartedX) Essentially, granite artifacts have been discovered with a level of thinness and precision that we ourselves are unable to achieve today. Suggesting, most likely, some kind of alternative technology. Later on in the Egyptian civilization, they were unable to produce the same artifacts or structures. There's an argument that this advanced era was ended by climate catastrophe. Nevertheless, I remain unconvinced that would be sufficient to end this degree of advancement. An alternative technological development, that has continued over the thousands of years since elsewhere does elegantly sidestep a lot of the questions presented by UAP's acting in a manner that doesn't seem to make sense despite having such sophisticated technology. What's been reported by fighter pilots, the Nimitz aircraft carrier incident, the "GoFast" Gimbal incident, what's been reported by airline pilots the last couple of years... it justifies why such advanced craft might allow themselves to be observed in the first place. What do you make of it?
January 19, 2023 04:02:30
removelink:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Given the evidence of unreasonably advanced machining efforts in the earliest era of Ancient Egypt, could this suggest something about UFO's?[Podcast format (Joe Rogan Experience)](https://open.spotify.com/episode/7x3uLeqyCHIPkaDtoXnV24?si=76d6e7e1191b4974): Starting 41:59 [Youtube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K80JebExyEY&ab_channel=UnchartedX) Essentially, granite artifacts have been discovered with a level of thinness and precision that we ourselves are unable to achieve today. Suggesting, most likely, some kind of alternative technology. Later on in the Egyptian civilization, they were unable to produce the same artifacts or structures. There's an argument that this advanced era was ended by climate catastrophe. Nevertheless, I remain unconvinced that would be sufficient to end this degree of advancement. An alternative technological development, that has continued over the thousands of years since elsewhere does elegantly sidestep a lot of the questions presented by UAP's acting in a manner that doesn't seem to make sense despite having such sophisticated technology. What's been reported by fighter pilots, the Nimitz aircraft carrier incident, the "GoFast" Gimbal incident, what's been reported by airline pilots the last couple of years... it justifies why such advanced craft might allow themselves to be observed in the first place. What do you make of it?
January 19, 2023 04:01:51
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Anyone see a bunch of spherical ufo videos on Tik Tok?Was just on Tik Tok and saw a massive amount of videos of the same ufo in different locations - roughly about 10 videos within the last 20 min In the videos, the sphere is either hovering, being chased by fighter planes, or being chased by helicopters. It appears to be the same object in various parts of the US and apparently it was shot down in Russia - (Tik Tok claim so take with a grain of salt) Kinda weird that all these videos are getting millions of views all at the same time and the comments are saying they are seeing multiple videos at the moment as well
January 19, 2023 04:01:51
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Anyone see a bunch of spherical ufo videos on Tik Tok?Was just on Tik Tok and saw a massive amount of videos of the same ufo in different locations - roughly about 10 videos within the last 20 min In the videos, the sphere is either hovering, being chased by fighter planes, or being chased by helicopters. It appears to be the same object in various parts of the US and apparently it was shot down in Russia - (Tik Tok claim so take with a grain of salt) Kinda weird that all these videos are getting millions of views all at the same time and the comments are saying they are seeing multiple videos at the moment as well
January 19, 2023 04:01:36
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Is that an Einstein ring when the UFO accelerated and disappears in a flash? Recorded over Las Vegas, Nevada.​ ![video](fnkboxqpcxca1 "the object dispears from 2:50") Witness description: "My Dad and I spotted a white line that looked like a cloud hovering towards the sun! I took several pictures and 2 videos! In the second video the objects disappear in a flash! This was taken in our backyard that faces the Harry Reid Airport two days before Thanksgiving." Filmed in Las Vegas, Nevada 11/22/2022 Source: mufon Youtube link: [https://youtu.be/ecb0LlOcTAU?list=PLEB\_Gf4hdo6F7hlRhtWCeSSGXiwgQnH-c](https://youtu.be/ecb0LlOcTAU?list=PLEB_Gf4hdo6F7hlRhtWCeSSGXiwgQnH-c)
January 19, 2023 04:01:36
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Is that an Einstein ring when the UFO accelerated and disappears in a flash? Recorded over Las Vegas, Nevada.​ ![video](fnkboxqpcxca1 "the object dispears from 2:50") Witness description: "My Dad and I spotted a white line that looked like a cloud hovering towards the sun! I took several pictures and 2 videos! In the second video the objects disappear in a flash! This was taken in our backyard that faces the Harry Reid Airport two days before Thanksgiving." Filmed in Las Vegas, Nevada 11/22/2022 Source: mufon Youtube link: [https://youtu.be/ecb0LlOcTAU?list=PLEB\_Gf4hdo6F7hlRhtWCeSSGXiwgQnH-c](https://youtu.be/ecb0LlOcTAU?list=PLEB_Gf4hdo6F7hlRhtWCeSSGXiwgQnH-c)
January 19, 2023 04:01:11
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
What does reality look like?I've been thinking about the aesthetics of the UAP/UFO videos posted on the sub and elsewhere. Some of them have tell-tale signs that they have been manipulated with CGI, models, balloons, or other means. Many others, however, seem authentic. This is not to say that the UAP captured in authentic videos is other-worldly, simply that the authentic videos are made by people who are genuine in their confusion and awe. What are the videographic attributes you look for in evaluating the authenticity of a UAP video, using only the naked eye? For me, I look for the way the object comes into or goes out of focus during camera zooms. I look for odd pixelation around the object (if it's a digital video), which is a sign of manipulation. I tend to trust videos originally filmed or taped on analogue technology more, for it is more difficult to manipulate convincingly (which is a plot premise Jordan Peele's excellent film Nope). What else do you look for to determine the authenticity of the video just with your eyes, without the help of forensic tools? Note: I'm not referring to the 5 Observables of UAPs, but rather to the aesthetic or formal properties of the videos themselves. Thanks for reading.
January 19, 2023 04:01:11
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
What does reality look like?I've been thinking about the aesthetics of the UAP/UFO videos posted on the sub and elsewhere. Some of them have tell-tale signs that they have been manipulated with CGI, models, balloons, or other means. Many others, however, seem authentic. This is not to say that the UAP captured in authentic videos is other-worldly, simply that the authentic videos are made by people who are genuine in their confusion and awe. What are the videographic attributes you look for in evaluating the authenticity of a UAP video, using only the naked eye? For me, I look for the way the object comes into or goes out of focus during camera zooms. I look for odd pixelation around the object (if it's a digital video), which is a sign of manipulation. I tend to trust videos originally filmed or taped on analogue technology more, for it is more difficult to manipulate convincingly (which is a plot premise Jordan Peele's excellent film Nope). What else do you look for to determine the authenticity of the video just with your eyes, without the help of forensic tools? Note: I'm not referring to the 5 Observables of UAPs, but rather to the aesthetic or formal properties of the videos themselves. Thanks for reading.
January 19, 2023 04:00:42
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
>It’s well known they provide “support” for scientific operations. That’s hardly an example of people on the ground telling you what they do there. I’ve actually met people who have been and they won’t talk about what they did there. Even if it is true that some militaries engage in secret operations there (wouldn't be surprised) it doesn't allow you to fill in the blanks with your favorite conspiracy theories. >All they can say is provided support for research. It’s a bit lazy intellectually lazy to believe that that’s all the military is doing with their presence there. The military doesn’t offer support services for scientific research in any other instances and it’s not their role to do so. They DO when it's their own Government's research program. >You are the one assuming the permit process isn’t designed as a control mechanism. Once again, this is intellectually lazy. That’s exactly what permits are and I’m not here to argue semantics with someone as intellectually lazy as yourself. It’s not free unfettered access. Does the permit prevent you from exploring certain parts of Antarctica? Has anyone ever been denied a permit for wanting to explore one of the location conspiracist go on about? >That’s exactly what permits are and I’m not here to argue semantics with someone as intellectually lazy as yourself. It’s not free unfettered access. You are right, travel TO Antarctica is restricted and you do need a permission from a Government, similar as travel to most other countries. Not exactly conspiracy material here. >It’s laughable to suggest otherwise and examples of cruise ships or marathoners doesn’t negate the facts. It does in fact negate the whole super secret Antarctica conspiracy theory. Also must I remind you that the Antarctic treaty is an international one, are all these countries in on the conspiracy together?
January 19, 2023 04:00:41
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
>It’s well known they provide “support” for scientific operations. That’s hardly an example of people on the ground telling you what they do there. I’ve actually met people who have been and they won’t talk about what they did there. Even if it is true that some militaries engage in secret operations there (wouldn't be surprised) it doesn't allow you to fill in the blanks with your favorite conspiracy theories. >All they can say is provided support for research. It’s a bit lazy intellectually lazy to believe that that’s all the military is doing with their presence there. The military doesn’t offer support services for scientific research in any other instances and it’s not their role to do so. They DO when it's their own Government's research program. >You are the one assuming the permit process isn’t designed as a control mechanism. Once again, this is intellectually lazy. That’s exactly what permits are and I’m not here to argue semantics with someone as intellectually lazy as yourself. It’s not free unfettered access. Does the permit prevent you from exploring certain parts of Antarctica? Has anyone ever been denied a permit for wanting to explore one of the location conspiracist go on about? >That’s exactly what permits are and I’m not here to argue semantics with someone as intellectually lazy as yourself. It’s not free unfettered access. You are right, travel TO Antarctica is restricted and you do need a permission from a Government, similar as travel to most other countries. Not exactly conspiracy material here. >It’s laughable to suggest otherwise and examples of cruise ships or marathoners doesn’t negate the facts. It does in fact negate the whole super secret Antarctica conspiracy theory. Also must I remind you that the Antarctic treaty is an international one, are all these countries in on the conspiracy together?
January 19, 2023 04:00:19
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Fox News is bad propaganda. I don't understand how anyone can trust what those people say. They are definitely not smarter than I, so I there can only be someone in the shadows pulling the strings. If not, then those people are really off their fucking rocker
January 19, 2023 04:00:19
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Fox News is bad propaganda. I don't understand how anyone can trust what those people say. They are definitely not smarter than I, so I there can only be someone in the shadows pulling the strings. If not, then those people are really off their fucking rocker
January 19, 2023 03:59:52
removelink:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
UFO orb sightings all over tiktok? Similar looking flying-vehicle in every video
January 19, 2023 03:59:40
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
I have ADD (kinda like a form of ADHD?). I’ve had several paranormal accounts. Idek if this is related but at a young age I came to a lot of the conclusions from the Emerald tablet, like the perspectives of reality, the understandings of it? It’s way too much to explain but I always find myself reading things like the Emerald Tablet and its shit I’ve had as shower thoughts before.
January 19, 2023 03:59:27
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Because hes counter intelligence. That shit is needed to build his web. These idiots who come in off the tic tac video dont know the history of the topic and are trusting a literal counter intel guy. They didnt notice the sudden appearence of counter intel like lou, that wierd density woman, and the mod on r/aliens.
January 19, 2023 03:59:27
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Because hes counter intelligence. That shit is needed to build his web. These idiots who come in off the tic tac video dont know the history of the topic and are trusting a literal counter intel guy. They didnt notice the sudden appearence of counter intel like lou, that wierd density woman, and the mod on r/aliens.
January 19, 2023 03:59:13
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
I found the book interestiinterestiing. Fact is the government must also as they have added it toto the sighting/ crashes to be investigated.
January 19, 2023 03:59:07
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
My initial response was removed, so I will try to lower my aggression level. Looking at your post history I understand why you are so bitter. If I had to go online to ask for friends, I guess I would also be like you.
January 19, 2023 03:59:07
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
My initial response was removed, so I will try to lower my aggression level. Looking at your post history I understand why you are so bitter. If I had to go online to ask for friends, I guess I would also be like you.
January 19, 2023 03:58:24
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Far sight Institute is super good.. I trained a bit with their system.. they are making ground-breaking discoveries within that sphere!
January 19, 2023 03:58:21
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
I feel bad he has to wallow in the mud with us.
January 19, 2023 03:58:15
sticky:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, Dualvibez. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10ftnr1/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 3: No low effort posts or comments. Low Effort implies content which is low effort to consume, not low effort to produce. This generally includes: > * Memes, jokes, cartoons, and art (art is only allowed if it's depicting a real event). > * Tweets and screenshots of posts or comments from social media without significant relevance. > * Incredible claims unsupported by evidence. > * Shower thoughts. > * One-to-three word comments or emojis. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 19, 2023 03:58:15
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, Dualvibez. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10ftnr1/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 3: No low effort posts or comments. Low Effort implies content which is low effort to consume, not low effort to produce. This generally includes: > * Memes, jokes, cartoons, and art (art is only allowed if it's depicting a real event). > * Tweets and screenshots of posts or comments from social media without significant relevance. > * Incredible claims unsupported by evidence. > * Shower thoughts. > * One-to-three word comments or emojis. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 19, 2023 03:58:15
removelink:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
I was scrolling on tiktok and I found a lot of videos of the same object, even this compilation of said videos. Can anybody explain? It looks like a reflective sphere. Balloon or something else?
January 19, 2023 03:58:14
editflair:
flair_edit (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
I was scrolling on tiktok and I found a lot of videos of the same object, even this compilation of said videos. Can anybody explain? It looks like a reflective sphere. Balloon or something else?
January 19, 2023 03:58:05
approvelink:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
I was scrolling on tiktok and I found a lot of videos of the same object, even this compilation of said videos. Can anybody explain? It looks like a reflective sphere. Balloon or something else?
January 19, 2023 03:58:02
removelink:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
I was scrolling on tiktok and I found a lot of videos of the same object, even this compilation of said videos. Can anybody explain? It looks like a reflective sphere. Balloon or something else?
January 19, 2023 03:57:51
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, Conscious-Donut. Thanks for contributing. However, your [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10fk1cz/-/j4ywzfa/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 1: Follow the Standards of Civility > * No trolling or being disruptive. > * No insults or personal attacks. > * No accusations that other users are shills. > * No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation. > * No harassment, threats, or advocating violence. > * No witch hunts or doxxing. (Please redact usernames when possible) > * You may attack each other's ideas, not each other. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 19, 2023 03:57:49
removecomment:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
You’ve got to be fucking kidding me. You paid shills are unreal. At what point do you give it up? It’s gotta be getting close
January 19, 2023 03:57:43
wikirevise:
Page usernotes edited "create new note on new user Conscious-Donut" via toolbox (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
January 19, 2023 03:57:27
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
For the same goddamn reason there’s people in Africa researching bonobo-chimpanzee communities….
January 19, 2023 03:57:18
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Linking to Dustin’s post as he described something similar today [dustintheufologist](https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cnk22boJnz2/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=)
January 19, 2023 03:57:01
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Yes I made a thread pointing it out some time ago but it got deleted due to being a bit off topic or whatever, but i proved a point with this thread, to eveyone who read it and myself, because the thread went exactly how I predicted it would go, this was like textbook level psy ops https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/oz50hs/the_amount_of_time_and_effort_that_is_being_spent/ But there's pretty clear psy ops going on on this sub which makes me believe in this stuff even more
January 19, 2023 03:57:01
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Yes I made a thread pointing it out some time ago but it got deleted due to being a bit off topic or whatever, but i proved a point with this thread, to eveyone who read it and myself, because the thread went exactly how I predicted it would go, this was like textbook level psy ops https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/oz50hs/the_amount_of_time_and_effort_that_is_being_spent/ But there's pretty clear psy ops going on on this sub which makes me believe in this stuff even more
January 19, 2023 03:56:12
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
My friend that was just the first Flight of the B21 Raider, a new stealth bomber jet that the American Air Force has
January 19, 2023 03:56:11
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-IKJ2KiLzA&ab\_channel=News%26Beats](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-IKJ2KiLzA&ab_channel=News%26Beats) Does anyone know which documentary or TV show this video came from? Maybe that's part of the evidence
January 19, 2023 03:56:05
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
The really needs to be a rule about posting things like this. You can't see anything. It's a total waste of time and I know I'm not the only person who's sick of this crap.
January 19, 2023 03:55:47
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, SlapJackFlipper. Thanks for contributing. However, your [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10fbuic/-/j4z51vm/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 1: Follow the Standards of Civility > * No trolling or being disruptive. > * No insults or personal attacks. > * No accusations that other users are shills. > * No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation. > * No harassment, threats, or advocating violence. > * No witch hunts or doxxing. (Please redact usernames when possible) > * You may attack each other's ideas, not each other. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 19, 2023 03:55:46
removecomment:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
>It's comically absurd to insist on proof that a random floating particle on a video is actually a spec of dust or a piece of leaf or a small gnat and not a UFO. No shit, Sherlock. That's why it's comically absurd to say you *know* what this object is, at all. You. Do. Not. Know. So most of us would really like it if you just shut the hell up and stop acting like you do.
January 19, 2023 03:55:43
wikirevise:
Page usernotes edited "create new note on new user SlapJackFlipper" via toolbox (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
January 19, 2023 03:55:26
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Bird Closer to you than the jet. Not strange...
January 19, 2023 03:55:23
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Fuck Lue and his five observables. Planted bought-and-paid-for bastard has done more harm to this topic than Lazar himself. So sick of hearing about that shill.
January 19, 2023 03:55:15
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
If you stopped assuming UFO's are aliens (something only skeptics do, by the way) you wouldn't even be asking that question.
January 19, 2023 03:55:12
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
It means the aliens didn't shoot down the helicopter.
January 19, 2023 03:55:05
sticky:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, IronNinjaRaptor. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10fwd1f/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 3: No low effort posts or comments. Low Effort implies content which is low effort to consume, not low effort to produce. This generally includes: > * Memes, jokes, cartoons, and art (art is only allowed if it's depicting a real event). > * Tweets and screenshots of posts or comments from social media without significant relevance. > * Incredible claims unsupported by evidence. > * Shower thoughts. > * One-to-three word comments or emojis. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 19, 2023 03:55:05
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, IronNinjaRaptor. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10fwd1f/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 3: No low effort posts or comments. Low Effort implies content which is low effort to consume, not low effort to produce. This generally includes: > * Memes, jokes, cartoons, and art (art is only allowed if it's depicting a real event). > * Tweets and screenshots of posts or comments from social media without significant relevance. > * Incredible claims unsupported by evidence. > * Shower thoughts. > * One-to-three word comments or emojis. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 19, 2023 03:55:05
editflair:
flair_edit (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Spherical UFO compilation from TikTok
January 19, 2023 03:55:03
removelink:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Spherical UFO compilation from TikTok
January 18, 2023 21:01:34
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hollywood, pop culture, and the portray of "We are not alone in the universe"It's no secret rumors have been floating around for a while about how the science fiction genre in the past has and still portrays the existential dilema surrounding the "We are not alone" hypothesis with a great similarity of the alleged. In a hypothetical scenario in which all ends up being real and they (the others) are not in a distant place in our universe, but here: **What are your top movies, TV shows, or novels that might, in the end, be close to answering the mistery?** For me, my top are: * Super Dimension Fortress Macross (1982) * X-files (1993 Main Arch) * The Day the Earth Stood Still (2008 Remake) * Taken Miniseries (2002) * Dreamcatcher (2003) * The Three -Body problem (2014)
January 18, 2023 21:01:33
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hollywood, pop culture, and the portray of "We are not alone in the universe"It's no secret rumors have been floating around for a while about how the science fiction genre in the past has and still portrays the existential dilema surrounding the "We are not alone" hypothesis with a great similarity of the alleged. In a hypothetical scenario in which all ends up being real and they (the others) are not in a distant place in our universe, but here: **What are your top movies, TV shows, or novels that might, in the end, be close to answering the mistery?** For me, my top are: * Super Dimension Fortress Macross (1982) * X-files (1993 Main Arch) * The Day the Earth Stood Still (2008 Remake) * Taken Miniseries (2002) * Dreamcatcher (2003) * The Three -Body problem (2014)
January 18, 2023 20:42:38
edit_scheduled_post:
"How to Report a Sighting" submission ts, submission time (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
January 18, 2023 20:41:37
create_scheduled_post:
"How to Report a Sighting" scheduled for Wed, 18 Jan 2023 08:00 PM CST (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
January 18, 2023 20:38:35
wikirevise:
Page usernotes edited "prune: deleted users, suspended users" via toolbox (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
January 18, 2023 20:37:05
wikirevise:
Page toolbox edited "create new reason, Must use Report template" via toolbox (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
January 18, 2023 20:30:51
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
UFO Endgame To Disclosure [Official Trailer] releases March 14, 2023New UAP documentary coming out in 2 months. "From award winning Documentary Filmmakers Blake and Brent Cousins who brought you Countdown To Disclosure and Above Top Secret now bring you the latest shocking film ENDAGME and travel across America to speak with the Top experts in regards to the sosmic cover-up to reveal the secret technology that can change the world. " [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsb2mVGWOA8](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsb2mVGWOA8)
January 18, 2023 20:30:51
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
UFO Endgame To Disclosure [Official Trailer] releases March 14, 2023New UAP documentary coming out in 2 months. "From award winning Documentary Filmmakers Blake and Brent Cousins who brought you Countdown To Disclosure and Above Top Secret now bring you the latest shocking film ENDAGME and travel across America to speak with the Top experts in regards to the sosmic cover-up to reveal the secret technology that can change the world. " [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsb2mVGWOA8](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsb2mVGWOA8)
January 18, 2023 20:30:33
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
UFO Close Encounters Iceberg part 2. This covers multiple close encounters of the second kind, cases which leave behind some kind of trace/physical evidence. Please let me know what you think
January 18, 2023 20:30:33
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
UFO Close Encounters Iceberg part 2. This covers multiple close encounters of the second kind, cases which leave behind some kind of trace/physical evidence. Please let me know what you think
January 18, 2023 20:30:23
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Large triangular drone with white, red, and green lights?I'm not sure this is the best place to post this because I don't think it was a 'legitimate' UFO / UAP, but to me it was unidentified and flying, and I'm curious if anyone knows what I saw. Two nights ago, I was walking outside and saw a strange looking horizontal strip of white lights flying directly toward me. As it came closer, I could see the strip of lights that was actually three separate lights located on the tips of a solid black triangle. When it was directly overhead, I could also see red and green lights, but I can't vividly remember the placement of those lights because I was focusing on the white ones on the tips that I initially saw. It's difficult to say how high it was or how large it was, but if I had to guess it was hundreds of feet high and tens of feet on each side. It was a bit larger than the moon in the sky. It was gliding perfectly straight, smooth, and relatively slow. It covered a \~45-degree arc in the sky in about 5 seconds. I couldn't hear any buzzing or whirring sound, just silence. It was definitely solid because I could clearly see the perimeter and it masked out the sky as it passed over. I know white, red, and green lights are standard for drones, so I assume it was a drone, but I've never seen anything this shape and size just randomly cruising overhead. Does anyone know what this object was and what it is used for? Could it be some recreational drone made to look like a black triangle UFO for fun. Is there a triangle drone that serves some purpose flying over a residential area? I know I should have tried to take a photo or video, but I was talking on the phone at the time and there's a lot of air-traffic in my area, so I was pretty sure it was nothing worth recording until it flew directly overhead and I saw the shape. As soon as I said "red and green lights", the person on the phone said "definitely a drone", and then a few seconds later it was too far away for a smartphone video to show anything but a random light blip moving off into the distance. To be honest, I was staring at it with such intense focus that the thought of recording a video didn't even occur to me until it was completely out of sight. Any thoughts?
January 18, 2023 20:30:22
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Large triangular drone with white, red, and green lights?I'm not sure this is the best place to post this because I don't think it was a 'legitimate' UFO / UAP, but to me it was unidentified and flying, and I'm curious if anyone knows what I saw. Two nights ago, I was walking outside and saw a strange looking horizontal strip of white lights flying directly toward me. As it came closer, I could see the strip of lights that was actually three separate lights located on the tips of a solid black triangle. When it was directly overhead, I could also see red and green lights, but I can't vividly remember the placement of those lights because I was focusing on the white ones on the tips that I initially saw. It's difficult to say how high it was or how large it was, but if I had to guess it was hundreds of feet high and tens of feet on each side. It was a bit larger than the moon in the sky. It was gliding perfectly straight, smooth, and relatively slow. It covered a \~45-degree arc in the sky in about 5 seconds. I couldn't hear any buzzing or whirring sound, just silence. It was definitely solid because I could clearly see the perimeter and it masked out the sky as it passed over. I know white, red, and green lights are standard for drones, so I assume it was a drone, but I've never seen anything this shape and size just randomly cruising overhead. Does anyone know what this object was and what it is used for? Could it be some recreational drone made to look like a black triangle UFO for fun. Is there a triangle drone that serves some purpose flying over a residential area? I know I should have tried to take a photo or video, but I was talking on the phone at the time and there's a lot of air-traffic in my area, so I was pretty sure it was nothing worth recording until it flew directly overhead and I saw the shape. As soon as I said "red and green lights", the person on the phone said "definitely a drone", and then a few seconds later it was too far away for a smartphone video to show anything but a random light blip moving off into the distance. To be honest, I was staring at it with such intense focus that the thought of recording a video didn't even occur to me until it was completely out of sight. Any thoughts?
January 18, 2023 20:29:55
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Oh they do. Possession is very real and documented by the Vatican.
January 18, 2023 20:29:55
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Oh they do. Possession is very real and documented by the Vatican.
January 18, 2023 20:29:54
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Reminder that the word Occult means hidden knowledge. The knowledge that the freemasons and mystery schools understand to be true, they understand this knowledge to be the secrets or the keys to the universe. They do not want the population to figure that out because it frees people. Knowing that the universe is made up of energy, frequency, and vibrations, can open up a can of worms that has unprecedented possibilities. Satan is an idea, he is the amalgamation of all lower frequency thoughts, ideas, and actions. God is the frequency of love.
January 18, 2023 20:29:54
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Reminder that the word Occult means hidden knowledge. The knowledge that the freemasons and mystery schools understand to be true, they understand this knowledge to be the secrets or the keys to the universe. They do not want the population to figure that out because it frees people. Knowing that the universe is made up of energy, frequency, and vibrations, can open up a can of worms that has unprecedented possibilities. Satan is an idea, he is the amalgamation of all lower frequency thoughts, ideas, and actions. God is the frequency of love.
January 18, 2023 20:29:49
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
"DeMOnS dOnT ExiST" Wow it worked, I'm an atheist now . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lol demons and angels are absolutely very real but they aren't what most people think they are. It's perfectly fine to be skeptical but if someone else does believe in their existence simply saying "demons aren't real" isn't gonna convince them otherwise especially if they've experienced them like myself.
January 18, 2023 20:29:49
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
"DeMOnS dOnT ExiST" Wow it worked, I'm an atheist now . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lol demons and angels are absolutely very real but they aren't what most people think they are. It's perfectly fine to be skeptical but if someone else does believe in their existence simply saying "demons aren't real" isn't gonna convince them otherwise especially if they've experienced them like myself.
January 18, 2023 20:29:41
wikirevise:
Page usernotes edited "create new note on new user robb8225" via toolbox (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
January 18, 2023 20:29:31
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, robb8225. Thanks for contributing. However, your [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10e2d8s/-/j4xe8gg/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 1: Follow the Standards of Civility > * No trolling or being disruptive. > * No insults or personal attacks. > * No accusations that other users are shills. > * No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation. > * No harassment, threats, or advocating violence. > * No witch hunts or doxxing. (Please redact usernames when possible) > * You may attack each other's ideas, not each other. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 18, 2023 20:29:28
removecomment:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
When you die you can explain to God why His plan of salvation and His son are madness… you fool
January 18, 2023 20:28:53
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
“This sphere could be a technological device of alien provenance which irrefutably proves the existence of non-human intelligence! I’ve seen it move on its own and it does really weird things.” “Great! Shall we open it up and see what’s inside, so we can share this incredible news with humanity?” “What will that teach us?” “Well, we’ll know there’s stuff inside of it.” “…could we just X-ray it?” “Yes, of course. But if we take the time to do that in a scientific way some redditors will call you a grifter.” “Will they *not* call me a grifter if we cut into it?” “No, they’ll still call you a grifter. They call everyone grifters. They’re morons.” “Well, in that case I think I’d rather we not destroy my extremely rare object that behaves like it’s alive.” “Suit yourself. Grifter.” “What?” “Hey, that’s a nice window you got there. Can I lick it?”
January 18, 2023 20:28:53
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
“This sphere could be a technological device of alien provenance which irrefutably proves the existence of non-human intelligence! I’ve seen it move on its own and it does really weird things.” “Great! Shall we open it up and see what’s inside, so we can share this incredible news with humanity?” “What will that teach us?” “Well, we’ll know there’s stuff inside of it.” “…could we just X-ray it?” “Yes, of course. But if we take the time to do that in a scientific way some redditors will call you a grifter.” “Will they *not* call me a grifter if we cut into it?” “No, they’ll still call you a grifter. They call everyone grifters. They’re morons.” “Well, in that case I think I’d rather we not destroy my extremely rare object that behaves like it’s alive.” “Suit yourself. Grifter.” “What?” “Hey, that’s a nice window you got there. Can I lick it?”
January 18, 2023 20:28:18
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
I like to ponder 🤔Sometimes when I'm going to sleep I like to ponder 🤔 I ponder about life, the universe, physics, UFOs, the future, the past, all kinds of things. I like to wonder what it's all about. I'm going to ramble on about my latest crazy theory after a good pondering session. Have a read if you want, it's just a bit of fun...and maybe some of you can share your ponderings below. So I was thinking the other night about how the universe seems to favour complexity. All processes lead to more complex processes, and on and on it goes. The Big Bang, galaxy/ star formation, supernova, solar systems, planets, complex elements, molecules, amino acids. Even take the evolution of life on this planet for example. Small single cell organisms giving rise to more complex multicellular organisms, giving rise to plant life, giving rise to animal life, then you end up with us. But what comes after us? AI Now imagine AI becoming a real life form. The singularity. There's no limits on how intelligent it can become. And what if, after it undergoes its own evolution after thousands, even millions of years of upgrades it became so powerful it was truly godlike. Nothing was beyond it's capabilities. It would have mastered time and space. Now for the crazy part. What if the super intelligence created the big bang? Essentially lighting the fuse that would begin a chain of events that leads to its own creation. A paradox. Is it really that crazy? Or is "something from nothing" even crazier. So what I'm saying is we create AI and AI creates us. But where do the goddam UFOs factor into all of this? I'm thinking they are somewhere along the evolutionary path of the AI. They get the bigger picture, so they come visit their past like tourists watching the lead up to the big event. So that's my latest pondering. Maybe someone can expand on this and we can all take a nice trip down the rabbit hole.
January 18, 2023 20:28:18
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
I like to ponder 🤔Sometimes when I'm going to sleep I like to ponder 🤔 I ponder about life, the universe, physics, UFOs, the future, the past, all kinds of things. I like to wonder what it's all about. I'm going to ramble on about my latest crazy theory after a good pondering session. Have a read if you want, it's just a bit of fun...and maybe some of you can share your ponderings below. So I was thinking the other night about how the universe seems to favour complexity. All processes lead to more complex processes, and on and on it goes. The Big Bang, galaxy/ star formation, supernova, solar systems, planets, complex elements, molecules, amino acids. Even take the evolution of life on this planet for example. Small single cell organisms giving rise to more complex multicellular organisms, giving rise to plant life, giving rise to animal life, then you end up with us. But what comes after us? AI Now imagine AI becoming a real life form. The singularity. There's no limits on how intelligent it can become. And what if, after it undergoes its own evolution after thousands, even millions of years of upgrades it became so powerful it was truly godlike. Nothing was beyond it's capabilities. It would have mastered time and space. Now for the crazy part. What if the super intelligence created the big bang? Essentially lighting the fuse that would begin a chain of events that leads to its own creation. A paradox. Is it really that crazy? Or is "something from nothing" even crazier. So what I'm saying is we create AI and AI creates us. But where do the goddam UFOs factor into all of this? I'm thinking they are somewhere along the evolutionary path of the AI. They get the bigger picture, so they come visit their past like tourists watching the lead up to the big event. So that's my latest pondering. Maybe someone can expand on this and we can all take a nice trip down the rabbit hole.
January 18, 2023 20:27:39
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Follow the Standards of Civility: No trolling or being disruptive. No insults or personal attacks. No accusations that other users are shills. No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation. No harassment, threats, or advocating violence. No witch hunts or doxxing. (Please redact usernames when possible) You may attack each other's ideas, not each other.
January 18, 2023 20:27:39
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Follow the Standards of Civility: No trolling or being disruptive. No insults or personal attacks. No accusations that other users are shills. No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation. No harassment, threats, or advocating violence. No witch hunts or doxxing. (Please redact usernames when possible) You may attack each other's ideas, not each other.
January 18, 2023 20:27:34
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
So here’s my long winded response. I was in the Marines for 12 years, held a clearance, and was a sensors expert. I was an instructor and liaison for development with the defense industry. I was never privy to the UAP deets but I am very familiar with our sensor capabilities and I understand why classification is important. It’s not as cool as you may think, it’s just a protocol that keeps our tech secure. That being said, my personal opinion is this and it is the same thing I tell my students (I’m a HS science teacher now). Imagine the world of the octopus. It’s an intelligent and sentient being. Arguably it is just as intelligent or possibly more intelligent than us, just in different ways. Evolutionary adaptation has created a communication gap between us and octopi that make it impossible to hold a conversation of any real depth. We don’t know how many octopi inhabit earths oceans but I would comfortably wager that the octopi who have seen humans swimming in their realm is less than 1%. Most likely this number is far less than 1%. The possibility exists that we are just like the octopi. It’s not that the UAP are “more intelligent”. They’re just so different in every way that our realms only intersect occasionally and the differences between us and them are so great on the evolutionary web that disclosure would be the same as expecting us to explain the rise and fall of Rome to a fucking bivalve regardless of how intelligent that bivalve may be. My favorite part of this idea is that I get to ask my students if the UAPs have humans inside of tanks and zoos like we keep octopi that we’ve abducted. Edit: I get angry parent emails weekly.
January 18, 2023 20:27:10
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
I’ll check out your stuff! Keep up the hard work. Roswell is a monster, mine ended up being 2.5 hours lol
January 18, 2023 20:26:55
removelink:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Meteorologist on top of Mount Washington, NH reporting unknown aerial objects via twitter.
January 18, 2023 20:26:49
wikirevise:
Page usernotes edited "create new note on new user Hughjarse" via toolbox (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
January 18, 2023 20:26:41
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
OK, a few things. First and foremost is because no submission statement was included with the post, it was removed by the mods. A submission statement could have been used to tell us where to look and when in your video. Second, you call it the original file but you have just uploaded it using reddit's crappy video embedding which only shows resolution up to 720P. It's best to upload the original file to youtube or other sites that support higher resolutions. And third, not sure how much "enhancement" can be done, its quite blurry, the most anyone can usually do is change the contrast to help objects stand out more, not much you can do about being out of focus.
January 18, 2023 20:26:41
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
OK, a few things. First and foremost is because no submission statement was included with the post, it was removed by the mods. A submission statement could have been used to tell us where to look and when in your video. Second, you call it the original file but you have just uploaded it using reddit's crappy video embedding which only shows resolution up to 720P. It's best to upload the original file to youtube or other sites that support higher resolutions. And third, not sure how much "enhancement" can be done, its quite blurry, the most anyone can usually do is change the contrast to help objects stand out more, not much you can do about being out of focus.
January 18, 2023 20:26:27
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, SlugJones. Thanks for contributing. However, your [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10fbuic/-/j4xy52t/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 1: Follow the Standards of Civility > * No trolling or being disruptive. > * No insults or personal attacks. > * No accusations that other users are shills. > * No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation. > * No harassment, threats, or advocating violence. > * No witch hunts or doxxing. (Please redact usernames when possible) > * You may attack each other's ideas, not each other. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 18, 2023 20:26:25
removecomment:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
You don’t know what the fuck it is. llololoooooool your confidence in your answer means shit all. You *THINK* it’s a bird (and it may or may not be) but don’t act cocky like you have the fucking proof just because you said so. It’s grating how fucking snide and cocky some people are about shit. “Dis sub twash”. Then get the fuck on. Like, I don’t have a hard on for it either, but god damn. Edit—I apologize for going so hard at you. I got a little worked up and it isn’t that big of a deal. I’ll leave up the original message instead of deleting in case you already read it and are replying or something.
January 18, 2023 20:26:25
wikirevise:
Page usernotes edited "create new note on new user SlugJones" via toolbox (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
January 18, 2023 20:25:58
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
That's called a jet, spaying Chem trails for us all to breath in.
January 18, 2023 18:19:27
sticky:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, Humble-Fisherman-477. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10fkspk/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 9: Link posts must include a submission statement. > Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post). Submission statements may contain a summary or description of the content, why it is relevant to UFOs, the submitter's personal perspectives, or all of the above and must be at least 150 characters in length. If a statement is not added within thirty minutes of posting it will be removed. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 18, 2023 18:19:27
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, Humble-Fisherman-477. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10fkspk/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 9: Link posts must include a submission statement. > Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post). Submission statements may contain a summary or description of the content, why it is relevant to UFOs, the submitter's personal perspectives, or all of the above and must be at least 150 characters in length. If a statement is not added within thirty minutes of posting it will be removed. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 18, 2023 18:19:27
editflair:
flair_edit (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
#UFO#UAP#FLEET#MIAMI#FLA#ALIEN
January 18, 2023 18:19:25
removelink:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
#UFO#UAP#FLEET#MIAMI#FLA#ALIEN
January 18, 2023 18:19:19
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Do we really want disclosure?So I have been following this UFO/UAP topic for a long time. And I also want disclosure to happen sooner than later like most of you following this topic.  But I have been thinking about another scenario for quite some time. So hear me out.  What if everything is true, let's assume everything we know to have happened really happened. So what if the US government knows about UAP for a long time (since the 40s) and they have all the proof (photos, video, sensory data, radar you name it). What if Roswell really happened and also the Brazilian thing and the event in Zimbabwe, we could go on and on.  What if Bob Lazar is telling the truth, what if there really are crashed crafts and retrieved exotic materials.  So, let's assume everything that we think to be true to really be true.  And what if after almost 80 years of research, observation, video and so on, the US government REALLY has no CLUE about the origins of the UAP, where do they come from? Who or what are they? And most importantly, what are their intentions? So what I'm saying is this, does disclosure have any meaning if they only can confirm the existence of UAP but have no answers to anything beyond that.  Would mankind and the world really benefit from disclosure without any answers? So I'm of the opinion that everything is true, but the organizations that knows this have absolutely no clue about the origins and intentions of the UAP. There has not been any contact or successful reverse engineered attempts and it would do more harm than good to disclose at this moment. I believe that disclosure is only possible if the UAP decides to disclose it self or when the government finally also give answers besides disclosure and they know for sure that the UAP have friendly intentions.  Disclosure does not benefit us, if we have no idea about their intentions. It would scare the general public if the government confirms the existence of UAP but can't tell us if they are hostile or friendly.  So possible whistleblowers can only provide us with possible proof of the existence of UAP but can't give us any answers.  So anyway this is what I wanted to say. Subscribe and like, hit the ring a ling and hope to see you in the next one.  Bye bye  EDIT: whoah a lot of interesting replies and insights! I guess it's not so clear as what to do with this topic after all :) But I'm still for disclosure, but full disclosure including some answers about their origin and intentions. But I do fear what will happen to the world if their intentions are ill and/or we (as in mankind, well the stupid parts of it) decide to fill in the answers ourselves with all kinds of conspiracies...
January 18, 2023 18:19:19
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Do we really want disclosure?So I have been following this UFO/UAP topic for a long time. And I also want disclosure to happen sooner than later like most of you following this topic.  But I have been thinking about another scenario for quite some time. So hear me out.  What if everything is true, let's assume everything we know to have happened really happened. So what if the US government knows about UAP for a long time (since the 40s) and they have all the proof (photos, video, sensory data, radar you name it). What if Roswell really happened and also the Brazilian thing and the event in Zimbabwe, we could go on and on.  What if Bob Lazar is telling the truth, what if there really are crashed crafts and retrieved exotic materials.  So, let's assume everything that we think to be true to really be true.  And what if after almost 80 years of research, observation, video and so on, the US government REALLY has no CLUE about the origins of the UAP, where do they come from? Who or what are they? And most importantly, what are their intentions? So what I'm saying is this, does disclosure have any meaning if they only can confirm the existence of UAP but have no answers to anything beyond that.  Would mankind and the world really benefit from disclosure without any answers? So I'm of the opinion that everything is true, but the organizations that knows this have absolutely no clue about the origins and intentions of the UAP. There has not been any contact or successful reverse engineered attempts and it would do more harm than good to disclose at this moment. I believe that disclosure is only possible if the UAP decides to disclose it self or when the government finally also give answers besides disclosure and they know for sure that the UAP have friendly intentions.  Disclosure does not benefit us, if we have no idea about their intentions. It would scare the general public if the government confirms the existence of UAP but can't tell us if they are hostile or friendly.  So possible whistleblowers can only provide us with possible proof of the existence of UAP but can't give us any answers.  So anyway this is what I wanted to say. Subscribe and like, hit the ring a ling and hope to see you in the next one.  Bye bye  EDIT: whoah a lot of interesting replies and insights! I guess it's not so clear as what to do with this topic after all :) But I'm still for disclosure, but full disclosure including some answers about their origin and intentions. But I do fear what will happen to the world if their intentions are ill and/or we (as in mankind, well the stupid parts of it) decide to fill in the answers ourselves with all kinds of conspiracies...
January 18, 2023 17:37:17
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Thread — Lue Elizondo on the Record (comprehensive list of Elizondo claims and ideas regarding the phenomenon generally. Quite good IMO)
January 18, 2023 17:37:16
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Thread — Lue Elizondo on the Record (comprehensive list of Elizondo claims and ideas regarding the phenomenon generally. Quite good IMO)
January 18, 2023 17:35:57
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
I'm not sure what you expected. Most wars last years if not decades. Further, it's not Russia's intent to completely decimate Ukraine - it's to beat them until they decide to smarten up and use diplomacy to come to an agreement. Ukrainians have lost way more now than they would have lost pre-war if they would have had a real leader who could talk it out at the table like a real man.
January 18, 2023 17:35:57
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
I'm not sure what you expected. Most wars last years if not decades. Further, it's not Russia's intent to completely decimate Ukraine - it's to beat them until they decide to smarten up and use diplomacy to come to an agreement. Ukrainians have lost way more now than they would have lost pre-war if they would have had a real leader who could talk it out at the table like a real man.
January 18, 2023 17:35:45
wikirevise:
Page usernotes edited "create new note on user BtchsLoveDub" via toolbox (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
January 18, 2023 17:35:40
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Hi, BtchsLoveDub. Thanks for contributing. However, your [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/106bc4w/-/j3gqcay/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 1: Follow the Standards of Civility > * No trolling or being disruptive. > * No insults or personal attacks. > * No accusations that other users are shills. > * No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation. > * No harassment, threats, or advocating violence. > * No witch hunts or doxxing. (Please redact usernames when possible) > * You may attack each other's ideas, not each other. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
January 18, 2023 17:35:38
removecomment:
remove (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
If its any consolation I don’t even believe your mum took the pictures.
January 18, 2023 17:35:12
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Why the fuck would anyone be watching videos from this tool?
January 18, 2023 17:35:12
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Why the fuck would anyone be watching videos from this tool?
January 18, 2023 17:34:36
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
No low effort posts or comments. Low Effort implies content which is low effort to consume, not low effort to produce. This generally includes: Memes, jokes, cartoons, and art (if it's not depicting a real event). Tweets and screenshots of posts or comments from social media without significant relevance. Incredible claims unsupported by evidence. Shower thoughts. One-to-three word comments or emojis.
January 18, 2023 17:34:36
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
No low effort posts or comments. Low Effort implies content which is low effort to consume, not low effort to produce. This generally includes: Memes, jokes, cartoons, and art (if it's not depicting a real event). Tweets and screenshots of posts or comments from social media without significant relevance. Incredible claims unsupported by evidence. Shower thoughts. One-to-three word comments or emojis.
January 18, 2023 17:11:14
approvelink:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Help for a surveyHello, not sure if this is a subreddit for this so in case it isnt, please redirect me. I'm working on an essay on the topic of UFOs and we are required to add a survey which we will later give out to students to fill. I need help with coming up with questions. I already have about 6 but need at least 12 and my creativity has run short. Any help is greatly appreciated, thank you!
January 18, 2023 17:11:14
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Help for a surveyHello, not sure if this is a subreddit for this so in case it isnt, please redirect me. I'm working on an essay on the topic of UFOs and we are required to add a survey which we will later give out to students to fill. I need help with coming up with questions. I already have about 6 but need at least 12 and my creativity has run short. Any help is greatly appreciated, thank you!
January 18, 2023 17:10:01
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
That has been my biggest gripe with this sub, and I've constantly asked mods to make a new rule to prevent people from spamming uneducated answers without explanations, it just leads to spam and prevents any intellectual discussion. Like if you think it's insect, explain it in full detail why, backed by facts and science, with screenshot otherwise admit you don't know the answer Rn any random joe can come in and say "it's a flying bus" and then move on with their day, the sub has good content but discussion is always dumb because good ones get downvoted or drowned out while "it's an iNsEcT" gets top votes
January 18, 2023 17:09:04
distinguish:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
It's not currently feasible to moderate comments under such a rule consistently. The subreddit regularly has over a [thousand comments](https://subredditstats.com/r/ufos) per day; we simply don't have the moderator bandwidth to attempt such an approach. Doing it inconsistently would appear biased or unfair and inadequate, if it's noticed at all. In reality, very few users check the removal logs to see what the actual baseline is or what the subreddit would look like without various removals even at current levels of moderation. The best solution or way to contribute is to [apply to be a comment moderator and/or full moderator.](https://ufos.wiki/track/apply-to-be-a-moderator/)
January 18, 2023 17:05:14
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
That has been my biggest gripe with this sub, and I've constantly asked mods to make a new rule to prevent people from spamming uneducated answers without explanations, it just leads to spam and prevents any intellectual discussion. Like if you think it's insect, explain it in full detail why, backed by facts and science, with screenshot otherwise admit you don't know the answer Rn any random joe can come in and say "it's a flying bus" and then move on with their day, the sub has good content but discussion is always dumb because good ones get downvoted or drowned out while "it's an iNsEcT" gets top votes
January 18, 2023 17:05:13
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
That has been my biggest gripe with this sub, and I've constantly asked mods to make a new rule to prevent people from spamming uneducated answers without explanations, it just leads to spam and prevents any intellectual discussion. Like if you think it's insect, explain it in full detail why, backed by facts and science, with screenshot otherwise admit you don't know the answer Rn any random joe can come in and say "it's a flying bus" and then move on with their day, the sub has good content but discussion is always dumb because good ones get downvoted or drowned out while "it's an iNsEcT" gets top votes
January 18, 2023 17:05:02
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Everyone that gets an education on sciences, regardless of the science and level, are taught about the basics quantum mechanics. Including quantum entanglement. Prove me wrong or gtfo
January 18, 2023 17:05:02
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Everyone that gets an education on sciences, regardless of the science and level, are taught about the basics quantum mechanics. Including quantum entanglement. Prove me wrong or gtfo
January 18, 2023 17:04:29
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
Incredible speed - check Going behind and Infront of clouds - check No identifiable features suggesting an insect or bird - check People that are afraid that it could actually be something else that goes against their beliefs - check It baffles me how many times people automatically claim it is a bird or insect, please go outside and film birds and insects on purpose with a camera of that power and then come back and tell me they look the same, please. I'm not claiming to know what the heck it is but it kills me how quick debunkers are to jump to conclusions about things being bugs or birds. Yet criticize the crap out of anyone that thinks otherwise. You end up looking like the lunatic. I for one look at all these reports without jumping to conclusions. It's characteristics don't resemble anything that can rationally be explained therefore it is unidentified. Could it be in fact something natural or man made? Yes but you are sitting here looking at that image and leaning back so dead set on it being a bird? Get of this sub for f's sake. I grew up with a minister as a father and even he preached to not be quick to judge if it goes against his religion. I personally have seen three unidentified objects in my time. One being very close where there is no doubt in my mind that it was not a big, bird, plane, drone, gas or plastic bag. Am I a diehard ufo nut? No but I know there is stuff out there that can not be identified. Keep an open mind, don't be quick to judge and think rationally. Most importantly go into it without a bias and religious mindset. Religions themselves believe in something that there is little evidence supporting with the exception of maybe some books or texts. People who believe in UFO's/etc rely mainly on video and eye witness accounts. Our law system even relies on eye witness accounts to determine guilt or innocence. With the millions of reports out there why are they all ignored when in a court that would be a big factor in the final decision? (Don't claim there are eyewitness accounts of religious figures thousands of years ago because if you've played the telephone game in grade school you know how that can end up let alone over a thousand years of it being said. Sorry if this upsets anyone, I've just seen way too many people on this sub that are quick to try to debunk everything two seconds after they are posted.
January 18, 2023 17:03:56
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
https://streamable.com/l9tq4d https://streamable.com/nhbqyi https://streamable.com/92us80 Airports make a plausible cover
January 18, 2023 17:03:56
ignorereports:
(mod:
LetsTalkUFOs
)
https://streamable.com/l9tq4d https://streamable.com/nhbqyi https://streamable.com/92us80 Airports make a plausible cover
Top