Public Modlogs

Check the mod logs of any subreddit that uses /u/publicmodlogs

December 27, 2022 11:40:35
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Ayyy mods, I'd elaborate more if I had time but I don't.
December 27, 2022 11:39:57
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Idk if it’s a personal attack, they are skeptical of the credibility of your statements. Specifically that you’re a Cyber security professional. “Spoked” is not a typo, it’s an improperly conjugated version of speak. That’s the kind of poor grammar that would make me cringe if I saw it in an email in any professional capacity, and would make me question the credibility of the writer.
December 27, 2022 11:39:02
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
For this sub, It's 90% of the mod team. This was revealed years back. The mods themselves use their own alts and bots to call everything swamp gas/lanterns whatever.
December 27, 2022 11:37:04
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
quarkquark_
)
A lot of *humans* don't have common sense.
December 27, 2022 11:36:51
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
The ones the government has not released yet.
December 27, 2022 11:35:26
distinguish:
(mod:
quarkquark_
)
Hi, TakeShitsMuch. Thanks for contributing. However, your [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/zvvwxu/-/j1tqeqv/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 1: Follow the Standards of Civility > * No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation. > * No harassment, threats, or advocating violence. > * No witch hunts or doxxing. > * No trolling or being disruptive. > * No insults or personal attacks. > * No accusations that other users are shills. > * You may attack each other's ideas, not each other. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
December 27, 2022 11:35:22
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Just saw another person call you out for shit comments all trying to be dismissive with absolutely nothing to back up your bullshit. Blocking you is the best option. Go be worthless somewhere else.
December 27, 2022 11:34:15
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
For this sub, It's 90% of the mod team. This was revealed years back. The mods themselves use their own alts and bots to call everything swamp gas/lanterns whatever.
December 27, 2022 11:31:51
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
quarkquark_
)
You've gone beyond speculating that it isn't man-made, and now you're speculating its means of propulsion? Oh boy.
December 22, 2022 12:32:26
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
quarkquark_
)
It only started lagging when I was writing the post , now it’s fine . I’ve been feeling kind of at a contentness. Not worrying much . I don’t know . I don’t think I’m “normal” like other people
December 22, 2022 12:32:16
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
quarkquark_
)
I just got random chest pains when I wrote that comment tho idk what that was about
December 22, 2022 12:32:02
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
quarkquark_
)
I was scared because I know we aren’t the only being here anymore. They just sat there , I’m going to post the full picture
December 17, 2022 18:15:10
distinguish:
(mod:
quarkquark_
)
Hi, Working_Peach5661. Thanks for contributing. However, your [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/zoey4b/-/j0mokoh/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 1: Follow the Standards of Civility > * No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation. > * No harassment, threats, or advocating violence. > * No witch hunts or doxxing. > * No trolling or being disruptive. > * No insults or personal attacks. > * No accusations that other users are shills. > * You may attack each other's ideas, not each other. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
December 17, 2022 18:15:05
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
haha you must be a christian or a cucked military boy who wasted their life as someones bitch. fuck you you fucking loser.
December 17, 2022 18:14:56
distinguish:
(mod:
quarkquark_
)
Hi, Working_Peach5661. Thanks for contributing. However, your [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/zoey4b/-/j0mpzes/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 1: Follow the Standards of Civility > * No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation. > * No harassment, threats, or advocating violence. > * No witch hunts or doxxing. > * No trolling or being disruptive. > * No insults or personal attacks. > * No accusations that other users are shills. > * You may attack each other's ideas, not each other. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
December 17, 2022 18:14:52
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
eat shit and die in a fire gaslighter
December 17, 2022 18:14:33
wikirevise:
Page usernotes edited "create new note on new user Working_Peach5661" via toolbox (mod:
quarkquark_
)
December 17, 2022 18:13:58
distinguish:
(mod:
quarkquark_
)
Hi, Working_Peach5661. Thanks for contributing. However, your [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/zoey4b/-/j0mps86/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 1: Follow the Standards of Civility > * No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation. > * No harassment, threats, or advocating violence. > * No witch hunts or doxxing. > * No trolling or being disruptive. > * No insults or personal attacks. > * No accusations that other users are shills. > * You may attack each other's ideas, not each other. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
December 17, 2022 18:13:54
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
No but I'm happy you're enjoying your soma you dumb fuck. Also hope you enjoy it when China beats the fuck out of the U.S. military because they're not fucking dipshits who believe in angels and demons and santa clause. Baptist fucking idiots.
December 17, 2022 18:13:35
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
I mean maybe it doesn’t sound crazy for a former president to have his name attached to a tv show about one of the most famous alien abduction cases (real or fake).. but I guess it wouldn’t sound crazy coming only a couple days after a completely different former president publicly announced his own NFT scam with photoshopped pictures of himself as a hero like the invitation to a bar mitzvah.. Realistically it’s pretty crazy for a president to produce a tv show about such a notoriously poisonous topic again whether you believe the story or not. It should be something that both non-believer and believers can agree is very what the fuck. I’ll even venture to say that if the show comes out and is about how they’re liars or that they’re crazy or even that it’s actually a cover for MKultra experiments it’s still pretty wild. Dismissing news like this is like plugging your ears and yelling “LALALA”.
December 17, 2022 18:13:18
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Although the movie with James Earl jones was pretty darn good, I’m anxious to see what they do with this.
December 17, 2022 18:13:13
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
quarkquark_
)
The gov knows more than you think, what blows my mind President’s are even told just so much, need to know basis. I think many ufo are living right under our feet, and the gov. Is afraid of panic
December 17, 2022 18:13:08
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
quarkquark_
)
I would just love to see one. I totally believe they exist and would love the governments of the world to be more transparent!
December 17, 2022 18:12:39
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
These lantern guys have to be trolls... It's become common on every post. Anybody who objects gets downvoted to oblivion, which suggests bots. I'm not a conspiracy person but I know how things work on reddit. I mod a crypto sub and it's a constant battle against bots, scammers and spammers.
December 17, 2022 14:54:25
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Kanye’s a Nazi, Trumps selling NFT playing cards, and Obamas making a UFO movie. Whoever’s writing this script is on a Hunter S Thompson bender
December 15, 2022 20:21:59
distinguish:
(mod:
quarkquark_
)
Hi, kokroo. Thanks for contributing. However, your [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/zlfi4k/-/j0as2i6/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 1: Follow the Standards of Civility > * No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation. > * No harassment, threats, or advocating violence. > * No witch hunts or doxxing. > * No trolling or being disruptive. > * No insults or personal attacks. > * No accusations that other users are shills. > * You may attack each other's ideas, not each other. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
December 15, 2022 20:21:07
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
UAP have been reported in the air, space & oceans - and according to Congress, "threats" are "exponentially increasing". Chris Lehto discusses UAP, USO, the NDAA 2023, whistleblower protections, and unveils brand new case files just starting to make headlines. "Buried deep in a report that’s an addendum to the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023, a budget that governs America’s clandestine services, Congress made two startling claims. The first is that “cross-domain transmedium threats to the United States national security are expanding exponentially.” The second is that it wants to distinguish between UFOs that are human in origin and those that are not: “Temporary nonattributed objects, or those that are positively identified as man-made after analysis, will be passed to appropriate offices and should not be considered under the definition as unidentified aerospace-undersea phenomena,” the document states." (VICE - link below) Chris Lehto is a retired F-16 Pilot, UAP Investigator, YouTube content creator, journalist at The Portugal News, and CEO of UAPSociety.com, an NFT-Funded UAP research platform. Chris has a Bachelors in Materials Science from the US Air Force Academy, and a Masters in Aeronautical Science from Embry-Riddle University. In addition to writing stories on the UAP phenomenon for The Portugal News, he hosts “The Lehto Files”, a popular YouTube videocast with over 60k subscribers.
December 15, 2022 20:20:53
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
quarkquark_
)
That was an incredible response. Thank you! I just saw Avatar 2 in 3D tonight and had a lil’ gummy beforehand. Made me think about how Earth might be a living organism and many supernatural things we perceive may just be Its dreams.
December 15, 2022 20:20:45
distinguish:
(mod:
quarkquark_
)
Hi, eng_mec_edu. Thanks for contributing. However, your [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/zmvkhu/-/j0efjt6/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 3: No low effort posts or comments. Low Effort implies content which is low effort to consume, not low effort to produce. This generally includes: > * Memes, jokes, cartoons, and art (if it's not depicting a real event). > * Tweets and screenshots of posts or comments from social media without significant relevance. > * Incredible claims unsupported by evidence. > * Shower thoughts. > * One-to-three word comments or emojis. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
December 15, 2022 16:10:44
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
i'd recommend watching "the phenomenon" by james fox instead. fuck greer.
December 15, 2022 16:10:31
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
quarkquark_
)
What’s your best guess as to why they’re here? Do you ascribe to the ETH, or do you lean more Vallee? (I can never get that guys name spelled properly)
December 15, 2022 16:10:20
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Too bad the post has been removed for being low effort. It’s a simple question, how do the moderators want me to make this simple question high effort?
December 15, 2022 16:10:16
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Yeah, idk. Some of the mods on this sub seem to have major biases.
December 15, 2022 16:09:45
distinguish:
(mod:
quarkquark_
)
Hi, Redditjannynightmare. Thanks for contributing. However, your [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/zmi4sq/-/j0bvdnl/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 1: Follow the Standards of Civility > * No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation. > * No harassment, threats, or advocating violence. > * No witch hunts or doxxing. > * No trolling or being disruptive. > * No insults or personal attacks. > * No accusations that other users are shills. > * You may attack each other's ideas, not each other. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
December 15, 2022 16:09:41
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
no one cares what you think ​ >Hancock actually think Rogan gives him more credibility? ​ Yes, having the most popular podcaster of all time on your side gives you credibility to everyone that isnt an r/averageredditor
December 13, 2022 21:42:15
distinguish:
(mod:
quarkquark_
)
Hi, transcendental1. Thanks for contributing. However, your [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/zk1wk8/-/j004mo3/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 2: This subreddit is specifically for the discussion of Unidentified Flying Objects. Please post other topics to their appropriate subreddits. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
December 13, 2022 21:42:07
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
This was deleted by mod jetboyterp less than 24 hours ago as being off topic. [Link](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/zjkgpp/breakthrough_in_nuclear_fusion_energy_tomorrow/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf)
December 13, 2022 21:34:12
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
My god, man. How could he not know he was being filmed when THE CAMERA IS LITERALLY POINTING AT HIM just a few feet away, right in his field of view LOL. Even if he thought the camera wasn't recording, it's still **** pointed at him, dude. Wouldn't he play it safe and not say that shit? He's a world leader, you really think he'd be that negligent? What is wrong with you guys, man? When people say "off air" that just means not live or in circulation, it doesn't mean "not being filmed". I beg you, please, use your brain. The whole thing is a joke. He was talking about Santa Clause just minutes earlier and he's referring to the Hollywood film Men in Black. Again, I beg you, use. your. brain. My god, I dont know what it is with you guys lol. This is hilarious and sad to me, I can't tell if yall are crazy or just dishonest assholes.
December 13, 2022 21:32:38
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
I would skip them. He's just another talking head.
December 12, 2022 22:42:35
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Someone kick this guy from the subreddit. What a joke lol
December 12, 2022 22:41:56
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
sounds like your part of the problem
December 12, 2022 22:41:21
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Don't worry everyone, Detective Dip$#!t solved it over here!
December 12, 2022 22:40:53
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Username adds up. Dummy, that is a plane. The kind you see every day.
December 12, 2022 22:40:10
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
With the whole possibility we live in a simulation speculation I think these could be moderators or observers
December 12, 2022 22:40:05
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Seems like related speculation [of this post](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/zjkgpp/breakthrough_in_nuclear_fusion_energy_tomorrow/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf) removed by a r/UFOs mod less than 24 hours ago
December 11, 2022 10:56:27
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
I mean what kind of information do you have that warrants an AMA?
December 11, 2022 10:56:07
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Follow the Standards of Civility: No trolling or being disruptive. No insults or personal attacks. No accusations that other users are shills. No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation. No harassment, threats, or advocating violence. No witch hunts or doxxing. (Please redact usernames when possible) You may attack each other's ideas, not each other.
December 11, 2022 10:55:02
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Nope just someone with a different opinion. I know cancel culture doesn’t allow that that anymore.
December 10, 2022 21:34:03
distinguish:
(mod:
quarkquark_
)
It would help to report comments that are uncivil, or else we wouldn't know they exist without actively looking through every single thread.
December 10, 2022 21:31:44
addremovalreason:
1 Follow the Standards of Civility. (mod:
quarkquark_
)
When I see a pro Lazar thread I take it as an indication OP has only surface level knowledge of the subject, not read many if any books, not looked in depth into Lazar's claims, ect. We should be past re-hashing this old debunked bs, it gets us nowhere. Here OP, some reading material; https://www.otherhand.org/home-page/area-51-and-other-strange-places/looking-at-the-bob-lazar-story-from-the-perspective-of-2018/
December 10, 2022 21:31:32
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
When I see a pro Lazar thread I take it as an indication OP has only surface level knowledge of the subject, not read many if any books, not looked in depth into Lazar's claims, ect. We should be past re-hashing this old debunked bs, it gets us nowhere. Here OP, some reading material; https://www.otherhand.org/home-page/area-51-and-other-strange-places/looking-at-the-bob-lazar-story-from-the-perspective-of-2018/
December 10, 2022 21:28:51
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
quarkquark_
)
>only surface level knowledge of the subject >not read many if any books The kind of *obvious, thinly-veiled* insults that fly on this forum as long as the person throwing the shade is a skeptic. Pitiful, clearly biased work, especially when the removed comment below this is proof the mods have been here. Screenshotted.
December 10, 2022 21:27:55
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
My thoughts exactly. Jacques Vallee is the "godfather of silicon Valley" and a long time ufo researcher. Where's the tech? We're soaking in it!
December 10, 2022 21:27:51
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
My thoughts exactly. Jacques Vallee is the "godfather of silicon Valley" and a long time ufo researcher. Where's the tech? We're soaking in it!
December 10, 2022 21:26:47
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
There is no point in discussion with you, you Know it all and have an answer for everything. Which is telling that a man or woman who is not open to learning and believes themselves the expert will always be lesser than the lowest student. You discount expert navigators, throw in fallacies in logic bringing up religion out of nowhere, and discount any reasonable input from others Best of luck in your path of life. I have a feeling you have other difficulties in it that require your energy and attention. Dont waste it on a topic you cant understand or have a chance in growing your ability to understance.
December 10, 2022 21:26:19
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
>How do I know that that picture is of a frisbee taken by a high speed camera? By looking at it.
December 9, 2022 00:29:41
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
quarkquark_
)
I seen them almost every Wed night , I got lucky filming this honestly
December 9, 2022 00:29:31
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Yes, I seen them every Wed night
December 9, 2022 00:29:11
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Take this with a grain of salt. This is my opinion, just like every other user post and mod post here. No abrupt movement. Lights in and out. Zero zoom or focus on objects in the sky. Not that you would see anything of substance if you did zoom here in this very short video taken from inside a car behind glass. Why would it be anything other than lanterns, bugs, or drones or so so so so many other man made objects. I’m on vacation somewhere I actually get to see the sky at night in a remote location on earth. The amount of times I’ve spotted something darting around immediately looking like movement of something otherworldly, followed by actually watching it for more than a 5 seconds allows me to realize it’s a bug, bird, drone. Literally watched a small dot following a plane high in the sky today. Gave it a moment and turned out to be a butterfly. Sounds dumb right? So are videos of flares in the sky. These night videos are complete trash for this community. “I saw something that really freaked me out tonight”. Yeah? Did you actually watch it and record it fading away completely in the sky not moving? Or was this it? No way could flares stay in the sky fading in and out from anything else in the air, right? We all want to believe. But bro, come on. This takes up space on my feed.
December 9, 2022 00:28:54
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Yeah possible, the objects ( lights) would appear then disappear thur out the night and eventually they would all end up in this formation, I know the video sucks but I got lucky being able to film this video due to how fast they were
December 8, 2022 21:58:45
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
It's just a drone, we're all alone! You cannot think it's not starlink. Ufos are all malarkey, just ask /u/flarkey.
December 8, 2022 21:58:24
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Such piffle here I look to this forum for interesting new and surprising posts. Then the basic ilk here post more balloon videos and essays calling out skeptics for not liking the latest seagull video as a transmedium triangle that ate my corn-dog. Post something worthy and maybe you'll have less time to post crap.
December 8, 2022 21:58:22
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Such piffle here I look to this forum for interesting new and surprising posts. Then the basic ilk here post more balloon videos and essays calling out skeptics for not liking the latest seagull video as a transmedium triangle that ate my corn-dog. Post something worthy and maybe you'll have less time to post crap.
December 8, 2022 21:57:53
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Ya know, I have noticed an uptick in UFO's as the number of hobby level ans professional level drones in the wild have increased. Friendly reminder, anything can be a UFO if you're bad enough at identifying things!
December 8, 2022 21:57:41
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Garbage in, garbage out. Any conclusions you can draw from your datasets are going to be hampered by the poor quality of the data and the manner it’s collected.
December 8, 2022 21:57:04
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Ten four that's a Chinese lantern, flare, drone with a touch of weather balloon. Possibly propelled by swamp gas.
December 8, 2022 21:56:48
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Elizondo always seemed like a scammer to me.. that chin puff doesn't lie. There's no evidence he ever worked at the pentagon.
December 6, 2022 14:12:05
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
quarkquark_
)
for better quality stuff please use google drive to share. Some people can edit those/work on them, zoom etc, and post results on YT.
December 6, 2022 14:11:48
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
„Mod note- while the title may be accurate the description of the video is in fact not. It is a worthwhile interview but does not address the ancient handbag depictions, Enki or pinecone descriptions or the discussion of Stargate as indicated by OP. Vague, heavily editorialized, misleading, clickbait, inaccurate post titles, or titles in all caps are not allowed.“ Thank you mods, you saved me quite some time and a possible negative comment 😮‍💨
December 6, 2022 14:11:23
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
I've learned that now. Frankly I was shocked at the degree and frequency of their constant misidentifications, and I suppose it makes sense given that this a relatively new phenomenon.
December 5, 2022 22:09:17
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Listen, clown: Marjorie Fish is the scientist who "verified" Betty's star map, and she has since retracted her findings, *because they were wrong.* At this point, intentionally repeating this **false** claim is **lying.** If you want to do that, you are not a good person. Goodbye.
December 5, 2022 22:08:27
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
I dunno man, the Varginas I saw all looked pretty real. Looked so real you can almost taste em.
December 5, 2022 22:08:15
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
I dunno man, the Varginas I saw all looked pretty real. Looked so real you can almost taste em.
December 5, 2022 22:07:01
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Wait a minute. A UFO landed on the lawn of the White House. In dramatic fashion, a door on the side of the craft opened up,and out came…..”a duck fucking liberals,while looking at a group of fascists?”
December 5, 2022 22:05:57
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
I doubt the guy’s ever seen a vagina. That’s for sure.
December 5, 2022 22:05:38
wikirevise:
Page usernotes edited "create new note on new user ask0329" via toolbox (mod:
quarkquark_
)
December 5, 2022 22:05:14
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
I can see the comments now. Its a duck Its starlink flare Its a lantern Its a night time skydivers. Its a drone Its CGI. Lol
December 5, 2022 21:58:52
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
This is a troll post, and low effort. End of story.
December 5, 2022 21:36:08
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
https://old.reddit.com/r/skinwalkerranch/comments/zbvpvg/successful_ce5_with_ufo_caught_on_video_watch_as/ this was reported from orange county recently. Maybe a similar thing? /u/fallotheprophets
December 5, 2022 21:35:41
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Unsure, the witness didn't share their camera specs. But I agree with you anyway.
December 5, 2022 21:35:37
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
I've been wading through so many posts of identifiable objects, this one was the best one I found so far in that database. Yes I took three courses when I was a grad student on climate and meteorology and winds are definitely less predictable with altitude. I think this is a balloon too.
December 5, 2022 21:35:24
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Thanks for sharing. The photo in my post was taken by the farmer I think.
December 5, 2022 21:35:15
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Beautiful day out. Reminds me of home.
December 5, 2022 21:35:13
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
I thought these weren't starlink until I read and watched your explanation. Your work tracking satellites is the stuff of legend. E - If anyone still has doubts about this explanation, take 44 seconds to watch this video flarkey made [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZDxBT8fbXw&ab\_channel=Flarkey](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZDxBT8fbXw&ab_channel=Flarkey) which puts the pilot video side by side with satellite trajectories at the same time and place. It's literally undeniable that these are starlink satellites.
December 5, 2022 21:34:30
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Seems like a plane contrail to me as well tbh.
December 5, 2022 21:32:16
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
I had this thought on acid the other night, even if it sounds like a schizo conspiracy theory it's still a neat idea haha
December 5, 2022 21:31:15
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Ah, so you're just a bad person. Got it.
December 5, 2022 21:29:06
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
You are talking bullshit here. The point of going about this scientifically is exactly to find out what *objectively* is visible. Exactly opposed to what biased people wish to see. Just claiming "fake and dumb" as you proposed is the height of bias.
December 5, 2022 18:48:58
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Sound like every single Right Wing election fraud claim
December 5, 2022 18:48:16
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
“I’ve got an enormous dick in my mouth. How’d that get there?!?” - fulminic
December 5, 2022 18:46:55
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Like I tell my toddler..use your words. :)
December 5, 2022 14:14:19
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Also the Phoenix Lights, which have also been debunked.
December 5, 2022 14:13:47
wikirevise:
Page usernotes edited "create new note on new user MtnMaiden" via toolbox (mod:
quarkquark_
)
December 5, 2022 14:12:43
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Circle jerk. Wheres the proof you tards
December 3, 2022 23:11:49
addremovalreason:
3 No low effort posts or comments. (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Thanks, Mick! ;)
December 3, 2022 22:56:53
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
There are still people who believe that this sighting is real. See the bottom of the thread for the usual believers.
December 3, 2022 22:55:59
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
I like how you turned this perfectly polite comment: [https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/zbfzw4/comment/iyqzcoj/?utm\_source=share&utm\_medium=web2x&context=3](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/zbfzw4/comment/iyqzcoj/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3) into your version there. It's almost as if some people treat mild disagreement as a personal affront. You can actually see it right in your comment. **Everyone else sees:** "This is obviously a \[prosaic explanation here\]. We shouldn't waste time on this \[prosaically explained object\]" **You see:** "This is a \[prosaic explanation\]. I'm smarter than everyone because I shared a prosaic explanation. Everyone else is stupid." There isn't a single direct insult from a skeptic in the original thread. You knew that that's why you didn't *initially* post any evidence of your claims (which is expected from a non-skeptic).
December 3, 2022 22:54:55
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Thanks for sharing. Please don't delete this post. It's a useful video reference.
December 3, 2022 22:45:10
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Some believers think that the faker a UAP looks, the more "real" it is. Their excuse is that "UAPs look fake in real life therefore obviously CGI or fake sightings are real!!"
December 3, 2022 22:44:51
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Isn't this you in that specific original thread? ["You're an idiot and using this logical fallacy as an argument and it's disingenuous as hell. Nowhere did they say it was aliens. Just because they don't believe the weak debunk attempt doesn't mean they think it's aliens. Grow up a little."](https://imgur.com/rKs1Itz) Ironic.
December 3, 2022 22:44:38
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
I like to use evidence when I make claims. A practice I know doesn't mean much to you but it should.
December 3, 2022 22:44:21
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
This was your comment: ["You're an idiot and using this logical fallacy as an argument and it's disingenuous as hell. Nowhere did they say it was aliens. Just because they don't believe the weak debunk attempt doesn't mean they think it's aliens. Grow up a little."](https://imgur.com/rKs1Itz) Good to see you backtracking so fast after I proved you wrong about there not being any polite prosaic explanations. "Why would I provide evidence." Unironically the philosophy and main tenet of non-skeptics. Good night!
December 3, 2022 22:43:15
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
"I expect everyone else to provide evidence while I refuse to provide any myself" - You.
December 3, 2022 22:41:56
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
quarkquark_
)
I'm a CE2K experiencer, sustained duration, 25 minutes, no further than 300 feet distant until it transitioned from a near, stationary object to a far, distant moving one. In the 25 years since I've never once seen anything - video or still image - that in the slightest either looked or moved like the object I encountered. I've seen litterally thousands of images and clips that conformed to ufo *expectation* - never seen the thing I saw captured once, though. Images mean litterally nothing, I'm from a visual effects background originally, there is nothing visually I don't know how to or can't work out how to fake - physics is different, especially when it's well understood, applied stuff. People who believe in UFOs routinely dismiss it but, I'm not someone who *believes* in UFOs - I met one. I understood what I encountered. This is a pretty acceptable description of that thing in terms, scientifically, difficult to argue with. https://www.docdroid.net/Ahyl2H3/osv-proposal-22032018-pdf The weird part. It's actually a proposal submitted to NASA 4 years ago for a novel class of Crew Return Vehicle - yet, you watch. I bet they can't find hide nore hare of any evidence of UAPs when the time comes to make public whatever reports, but they *can* have submission proposals for vehicles operating like this...
December 3, 2022 22:40:47
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Why do you say "Dr." Jesse Marcel? Did he receive a doctorate no one is aware of? And you exchanged emails with him even though he died in 1986? It's telling what people will believe/upvote when they want it to be real, without even the most cursory Google searches.
December 3, 2022 22:40:19
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Anyone read Karl Pflock's book about Roswell? He's a believer in the extraterrestrial hypothesis behind UFOs and began digging into the Roswell incident with certainty it was a UFO crash ... and then he ended up realizing it was the worst of all "UFO incidents." In 1947, there was a debris crash on Brazel's ranch. It was a time of "flying saucer mania" - Kenneth Arnold's sighting was just months before - and everyone was wondering what flying saucers were (the ET explanation wasn't cemented yet), so when Brazel reported he found debris on his ranch, friends of his said it was probably a flying saucer. Brazel himself hadn't heard of this term yet (he didn't have TV or radio), so he reported it as such to the Roswell Army Air Base, and the bored press officer ran with it. The Army corrected this later, and the whole thing vanished. It wasn't until 30 years later that the incident became the Roswell we know today. That's when everyone started remembering and reporting on dead alien bodies, multiple crash sites, etc. The Phenomenon is real. But Roswell is the worst example of it to champion.
December 3, 2022 22:40:08
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Edit: Thanks for the award! Yes good job op, impressive work. Generally when new UAP sightings are posted, the trend goes: 1. Someone posts a vague, blurry picture with barely any coherent details. 2. People praise the sighting post. 3. Skeptics ask questions and offer prosaic explanations. (Most upvoted prosaic explanation on the thread was that it was fake). 4. Non-skeptics get mad that people dare question the sighting. Doesn't matter how polite, or how likely or unlikely the explanations is (bird), they will get mad at the people for *the act* of asking questions and providing suggestions. 5. The sighting is proven to be fake. 6. Non-skeptics delete their comments and pretend they never thought it was real in the first place and that zero people thought it was real. *"Some people thought it was a bird, I never said it was an alien craft, I just said it wasn't a bird and I totally didn't think it was a real, flying, metallic saucer!"* 7. Repeat this cycle ad nauseam. Here were some non-skeptic responses to skeptics who thought it was fake: ["Why would a professional snowboarding instructor decide to fake a UFO on one of his instructional videos. Makes no sense. Clearly real and unedited."](https://imgur.com/JTGZrrZ) ["There will always be a percentage of users who call fake, and since they're so convinced of that, they find something to discredit the footage."](https://imgur.com/YQjCqx8) ["Definitely a bird you can see it flapping its metal saucer."](https://imgur.com/W4tBJvi) From a user making the usual "skeptics will say it's swamp gas/chinese lanterns/birds" comment on every sighting. ["This dude has been making instructional snowboard videos since 2016. You think this was some 6 year long con to get rich off a "ufo" video? The truth is the debunkers have absolutely nothing that can explain this so they do their mental gymnastics to come up with a debunk."](https://imgur.com/Jht45gQ) ["You think people are constantly looking up and waiting to see a UFO? Of all the shitty debunks in this thread this ones the worst."](https://imgur.com/MgEc4Ql) And you have people still denying it's a hoax: ["Sorry, but your argumentation here is wrong, even if your conclusion should be correct: producing some image merely similar to the one seen in such a video doesn't prove anything. You can with near certainty find people who look (very) similar to you, too. Doesn't make them you?"](https://imgur.com/fhIuNK4)
December 3, 2022 22:39:37
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
That's good. Thank you for doing your research. As I mentioned in the post, I figured the ATC audio was likely a re-enactment. It's good to have such thorough confirmation. It's amazing to see someone who actually investigated this commenting here. That mic button thing is new to me thanks for sharing this explanation. I'll read up on the article you shared. I am disappointed this sighting isn't as amazing as I thought it was.
December 3, 2022 19:05:22
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
quarkquark_
)
It casts a shadow on his glove making it pretty obvious its the camera. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c2RN-0BxXsY&t=174s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c2RN-0BxXsY&t=174s)
December 3, 2022 15:45:01
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
If anything we are the aliens when we think about it. These niggas have technology 200 years + passed us…. We the aliens
December 3, 2022 15:44:47
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
This subreddit is specifically for the discussion of UFOs. For UFO-adjacent topics such as physics, the paranormal, or aliens, post submissions must describe how they relate to UFOs; for example via a particular sighting. Extraordinary claims must have appropriate and proportional evidence. Politics are not welcome. * Artwork, cakes, tattoos, etc.. are welcome in our Discord server (https://discord.gg/yqCBeeEAB3) * Discussions of aliens can be held at /r/aliens * Discussions about the paranormal can be held at /r/highstrangeness * Discussions about physics can be held at /r/physics or /r/science
December 3, 2022 15:44:23
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
True, this is a possibility. Authorities did find a fuel cap later on that seems to match the Cessna Valentich disappeared on.
December 3, 2022 12:21:13
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
quarkquark_
)
I think this devolved into a debate over whether there \*is\* an objective reality at all, or maybe the debate over [direct and indirect realism.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_and_indirect_realism) My unwarranted two cents - by virtue of being human and having a subjective experience, no matter how 'enlightened' one is, one can't help but have a preference when given a dualistic choice like this, no matter how narrow or inaccurate that choice may be. Nobody is truly an objective observer, myself included. We're all just doing our best to apply evidence to find truth. I also want the pure, unadulterated truth on this phenomena. But I also know that it'd be more interesting to me if it turns out to line up closer to the ETH/ID hypothesis than purely psy-ops and black projects.
December 3, 2022 12:20:43
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
quarkquark_
)
\>A theory that I don't ever hear mentioned but I find interesting is that these machines were made by a previous high tech civilization that was wiped out. Either wiped out or nearly so and they were forced inside the earth millions on years ago. Or even if the whole civilization died out, these machines are somehow able to self repair, refuel, etc. They just last damn near forever. I don't think that it is as outlandish as it seems. Or we could be a science experiment, who knows? Also find the ultraterrestrial hypothesis fascinating. I think we'll see an uptick in interest around this given Graham Hancock's boost from his Netflix series. There's a lot that irks me about Hancock, but I think he asks interesting questions and is certainly warranted in challenging the academic status quo. Challenge breeds progress. \>Remember, since the initial charting of the electromagnetic spectrum, humans have learned that what they can touch, smell, see and hear is less than one millionth of the reality that surrounds us. I think about this A LOT. We're perceiving a tiny little sliver of the activity happening around us - what makes us this the part of the spectrum we can interact with is any more "real" than the rest, or that other species couldn't traverse or interact with much more of it? Wild.
December 3, 2022 12:00:11
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
It means his analyses speak for themselves Kevin Durant.
December 3, 2022 12:00:03
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
No belief is necessary for fact-based analyses.
December 3, 2022 11:59:56
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
These pictures was hard to find on google, or I could not find them at all so I had to use completely different search engine and that was strange as well since this metal fragment should be the top priority for our investigation in my opinion
December 3, 2022 11:59:33
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Lmao let’s join a ufo thread just to say believing in ufos is idiocy. What a twirp
December 3, 2022 11:12:29
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Since this Reddit is closely monitored by the people who want to control the narrative, and the discussions on here.
December 3, 2022 11:10:35
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
quarkquark_
)
They’re showing themselves more and more :)
December 3, 2022 11:10:14
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
They are intentionally slowing down the craft to be captured like this. We are waking up!
December 3, 2022 10:43:05
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Hey well you should inform the mods you've solved the mystery and they can shut down the sub.
December 3, 2022 10:33:55
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Anyone who thinks that’s a bird is such an idiot
December 3, 2022 10:33:42
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Lmao let’s join a ufo thread just to say believing in ufos is idiocy. You dumb little twirp.
December 3, 2022 10:32:13
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
No low effort posts or comments. Low Effort implies content which is low effort to consume, not low effort to produce. This generally includes: Memes, jokes, cartoons, and art (if it's not depicting a real event). Tweets and screenshots of posts or comments from social media without significant relevance. Incredible claims unsupported by evidence. Shower thoughts. One-to-three word comments or emojis.
December 3, 2022 10:32:08
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
quarkquark_
)
People are so delusional in thinking the government is our friend. They are in cahoots with these fucking things and are patrolling the skies because it's the kind of defense systems these parasites have. Why are you not understanding this, guys? It's the most obvious thing. How the fuck you going to be born with the knowledge to fly saucers? You aren't. You're going to have to build a society and pray it succeeds so that you can go out and explore more and conquer more. It's what the colonists did to every land they took. So why can't the same be true for planets? I'm tired of pretending.
December 3, 2022 10:30:25
addremovalreason:
3 No low effort posts or comments. (mod:
quarkquark_
)
People are so delusional in thinking the government is our friend. They are in cahoots with these fucking things and are patrolling the skies because it's the kind of defense systems these parasites have. Why are you not understanding this, guys? It's the most obvious thing. How the fuck you going to be born with the knowledge to fly saucers? You aren't. You're going to have to build a society and pray it succeeds so that you can go out and explore more and conquer more. It's what the colonists did to every land they took. So why can't the same be true for planets? I'm tired of pretending.
December 3, 2022 10:29:08
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
People are so delusional in thinking the government is our friend. They are in cahoots with these fucking things and are patrolling the skies because it's the kind of defense systems these parasites have. Why are you not understanding this, guys? It's the most obvious thing. How the fuck you going to be born with the knowledge to fly saucers? You aren't. You're going to have to build a society and pray it succeeds so that you can go out and explore more and conquer more. It's what the colonists did to every land they took. So why can't the same be true for planets? I'm tired of pretending.
December 3, 2022 10:24:15
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Don’t worry they are all in line since Hilary “walked up there” and told the to “cut it out” and wagged her finger. So they are all clean now.
December 3, 2022 10:23:56
wikirevise:
Page usernotes edited "create new note on new user Appropriate_Way_4643" via toolbox (mod:
quarkquark_
)
December 3, 2022 10:22:24
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
quarkquark_
)
I saw 2 triangle shaped ufo’s a long time ago, that’s why I made a film that meditates on the idea of the presence, the story goes in a slightly different direction but the plan is to make a feature film eventually and look at some of the things seen, this is the trailer to the film if it interests you. https://youtu.be/Kq5j7ZBE4I4
December 3, 2022 10:22:10
approvecomment:
unspam (mod:
quarkquark_
)
In my film Gravitational Fields, in the dialogue a character says, “if there is something else out there, I reckon they would be terrified of us” you only have to look over humans history a small amount to scare any visitors! [https://youtu.be/Kq5j7ZBE4I4](https://youtu.be/Kq5j7ZBE4I4)
December 3, 2022 10:21:28
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
I stopped following this guys because of his NFT scams. Before he jumped on the UAP bandwagon, he was peddling NFT, and in the last few months he restart his push.
December 3, 2022 10:20:56
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Questioning credibility is the opposite of appealing to authority :)
December 3, 2022 10:17:25
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
They only come to me at night while I’m sleeping. They tell me to leave 20 dollars in my mailbox or else. Going a little broke but at least I’m not getting abducted.
December 3, 2022 10:17:06
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Mylar is pretty strong. It's not going to stop a bullet, but it's fairly resistant to tearing. It would not surprise me if a low velocity bullet (such as a .38 from a revolver) would only carry it along if nothing was anchoring the mylar elsewhere and the mylar wasn't containing a gas under pressure or something. In HeebieMcJeeberson's recollection, it would be the dirt that is providing the resistance to stop the bullet. I've never heard this before and don't know if mylar could actually do that, but it is a surprisingly strong material.
December 3, 2022 00:23:00
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
It’s weird looking at this now that I’m a dad, I gave my son the same face and pose after he destroyed his kite at Central Park.
December 2, 2022 23:57:46
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
I guess it’s just flares https://youtu.be/LQ8OcDanS4g I just conceptually don’t understand the purpose of those flares
December 2, 2022 23:57:32
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
I guess it’s just flares https://youtu.be/LQ8OcDanS4g I just conceptually don’t understand the purpose of those flares
December 2, 2022 23:12:18
unignorereports:
(mod:
quarkquark_
)
Tom Delonge says UFOs are from outside of time
December 2, 2022 23:11:56
ignorereports:
(mod:
quarkquark_
)
Tom Delonge says UFOs are from outside of time
December 2, 2022 16:25:23
addremovalreason:
3 No low effort posts or comments. (mod:
quarkquark_
)
We hope
December 2, 2022 16:25:11
addremovalreason:
3 No low effort posts or comments. (mod:
quarkquark_
)
True.
December 2, 2022 16:22:15
wikirevise:
Page usernotes edited "create new note on new user idiotcosmonaut" via toolbox (mod:
quarkquark_
)
December 2, 2022 16:21:35
addremovalreason:
1 Follow the Standards of Civility. (mod:
quarkquark_
)
i really want to like this community but a lot of you mfs seem like you need professional help
December 2, 2022 16:21:30
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
i really want to like this community but a lot of you mfs seem like you need professional help
December 2, 2022 16:21:23
addremovalreason:
3 No low effort posts or comments. (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Cross your fingers extra tight.
December 2, 2022 16:20:58
distinguish:
(mod:
quarkquark_
)
Please elaborate and cite sources on this claim
December 2, 2022 16:19:55
distinguish:
(mod:
quarkquark_
)
Leaving this comment because of the mention and linking of UAP/UFOs, but please post any paranormal experiences in /highstrangeness instead.
December 2, 2022 16:16:17
addremovalreason:
2 Posts must be on-topic. (mod:
quarkquark_
)
I saw possible orbs recently and then I experienced two episodes of sleep paralysis with a tall shadowy entitie. never had any before. If it's real then I'm pretty freaked out if so?
December 2, 2022 16:15:32
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
I saw possible orbs recently and then I experienced two episodes of sleep paralysis with a tall shadowy entitie. never had any before. If it's real then I'm pretty freaked out if so?
December 2, 2022 15:12:36
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Do you struggle with words? I’ve said nor indicated no such thing. You will have difficulty identifying things that are low observability and of nonconventional propulsion. It’s logical that this will lead to unidentifiable reports. Downvote and mock simple logic all you want. Listen to the rhetoric from military and government officials that some people call “disclosure” and tell me it doesn’t follow the same logic.
December 2, 2022 15:11:10
addremovalreason:
3 No low effort posts or comments. (mod:
quarkquark_
)
So you know the truth 😂😂👍👍
December 2, 2022 15:09:57
wikirevise:
Page usernotes edited "create new note on new user -celestial-star-" via toolbox (mod:
quarkquark_
)
December 2, 2022 15:07:41
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Wouldn’t doubt it. Thats “who they are” apparently. It’s mostly electromagnetism and the health effects it has on the human body and psyche. It’s coming from the sky and creating a field around people on the ground and in buildings as well. AATIP clearly described that this travels through solid surface and can “influence decision makers”. The idea that some UFOs are good and some are bad is a total fallacy. It’s done with malice by non-humans, and any of the “pro-ufo” people that may be inside the Pentagon need to really decide who’s side they want to be on because at some point questions are going to get answered. Also if those “in the know” felt like not talking about this would somehow save lives then I’m telling you that “non-disclosure” to mitigate UAP damages is a completely failed doctrine. I see the mods removed the main post as “off-topic” because they don’t realize just how on topic it really was.
December 2, 2022 15:06:49
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Wouldn’t doubt it. Thats “who they are” apparently. It’s mostly electromagnetism and the health effects it has on the human body and psyche. It’s coming from the sky and creating a field around people on the ground and in buildings as well. AATIP clearly described that this travels through solid surface and can “influence decision makers”. The idea that some UFOs are good and some are bad is a total fallacy. It’s done with malice by non-humans, and any of the “pro-ufo” people that may be inside the Pentagon need to really decide who’s side they want to be on because at some point questions are going to get answered. Also if those “in the know” felt like not talking about this would somehow save lives then I’m telling you that “non-disclosure” to mitigate UAP damages is a completely failed doctrine. I see the mods removed the main post as “off-topic” because they don’t realize just how on topic it really was.
December 2, 2022 14:52:41
distinguish:
(mod:
quarkquark_
)
Extraordinary claims like this require a bit of evidence. What are your sources?
December 2, 2022 14:51:42
distinguish:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Do you have any sources for this, uh, interesting claim?
December 2, 2022 14:50:59
distinguish:
(mod:
quarkquark_
)
Do you have any sources for this, uh, interesting claim?
December 2, 2022 14:34:59
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
They don’t probe for retribution. They probe for spermatozoa. It is generally only with “chosen” males (with good DNA 🧬 ), in order to elicit an automatic response of an emission of sperm that they collect purely for their hybridisation program. It’s not for any sort of punishment or sexual titillation. It’s all about a set of ET species aiding their own survival and avoiding their own extinction. They seem to study what nuclear radiation is already doing to our own DNA right now from all the nuclear “tests” that have occurred on earth (& now in space perhaps we hear).
December 2, 2022 14:33:49
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
You won't learn anything from dots in the sky.
December 2, 2022 14:33:22
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
December 2, 2022 13:52:38
addremovalreason:
3 No low effort posts or comments. (mod:
quarkquark_
)
There's voices inside his yead
December 2, 2022 13:31:16
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Just think of all the billions we keep sending to Ukraine which they won't even allow an audit of. I of course feel for the citizenry of Ukraine but we are way past the point where everyone should be pushing for peace between Ukraine and Russia. They had productive peace talks early on before Boris Johnson flew in to blow them up. Now Zelensky and most of NATO seem to have decided absolutely NO on leave talks. Nothing that is going on there is worth WW3. The Europeans don't seem to think it's as important as our government does when you look at the amount $ they are sending compared to the apparently blank check we are willing to write them. It's all gone too far. I hate proxy wars.
December 2, 2022 13:28:48
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
You don’t see titties in this video man? Damn. I guess I should stop watching porn
December 2, 2022 13:27:56
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Why isn't it ever flying boobs? Why does it always have to be balls? /s
December 2, 2022 13:26:14
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
I can materialize burritos for you for $3 each. You can find me at "Burritos Tacos Locos" everyday from 7 to 11pm.
December 2, 2022 13:26:06
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
He says all the small things too.
December 2, 2022 13:25:25
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
wise man once said .and I quote.. bing bing babba babba babb labba luuu
December 2, 2022 13:25:18
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
I would gladly pay Tom to learn how to materialize burritos in my hand
December 2, 2022 13:23:31
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Can't wait to see how tens of billions of our tax dollars are wasted on mass killing machines, as millions of children starve in the United States. The United States of corporate welfare is on full display today.
December 2, 2022 13:22:55
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
> This would depend on context and our definition of new accounts. Sure. But given that, have you *done* any analysis of how many accounts posting in the sub are however many months old? How many perfectly fine accounts would we flag as suspect for up to 90 days, a year, etc? > I think this would depend on how much weight and utility a person places in the upvotes and downvotes on r/UFOs in general. The idea is QCs would not be based on a singular metric such as upvotes, but presumably upvotes do have some value in terms of assessing comments, such that they could be incorporated into such a metric. Except you make downvotes the most powerful factor in the system you describe, which can't do anything but punish dissent and inhibit people from making any comment they think the crowd will disagree with. And, of course, you create an constantly-visible incentive for the people willing to use downvoting bots. > If we don't trust each other to a sufficient degree such that we could each utilize a system like this in a balance way I'd venture we should be questioning why we're participating in this forum to begin with. If there was so much trust to have, why would we use pseudonyms or need moderators? > The tier labels are optional, so there's no obligation for us to use them. We could also set the custom flair threshold quite low, making the entire system significantly optional past any point. You keep assuring people that you could set up the system so that they could hide their tiers "past any point" and that you could set that point quite low. Sounds like it'd be better to avoid that system at all.
December 2, 2022 13:21:58
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
>I'm sorry you've been treated this way. This behavior is against the rules and we work to remove such comments or ban users who do so in specific/repeated instances. Then I hope you won't promote it. >Personally, I attempt to take in as many factors and metrics as possible at a glance, not only the content of a comment. Moderators have many robust metrics available to them through Toolbox specifically, but none of them are available to non-moderators. Some still require interaction or time to load and are not visible at a glance. Then by all means take action against any accounts that you can prove to be bad faith actors and bots. Adding user flairs and creating a caste system that encourages group think based on an algorithm is not the way to do it. >Do you think comment karma provides any benefit? QCs wouldn't be based around such a singular metric, but this is an example of one such metric which is visible at a glance and ubiquitous across Reddit. Karma tells you if a person consistently says things that are popular in a given sphere, it says nothing in regards to their character. However, I do believe it can still be used as an indicator and if karma is overwhelmingly negative and almost no one agrees with the person, it may be low for a different reason than simple disagreement. In this case you should have a bot flag the comment and a moderator review the person's comments to see if they abide by the rules.
December 2, 2022 11:34:39
addremovalreason:
2 Posts must be on-topic. (mod:
quarkquark_
)
>If you are experiencing playback problems, please update your Flash player plugin What year is this
December 2, 2022 11:34:23
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
>If you are experiencing playback problems, please update your Flash player plugin What year is this
December 2, 2022 11:29:15
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Yep, these ideas are awful and it's shocking to see the mods even considering such systems. >Why not just have "Blessed Believer" and "Barely-Tolerated Skeptic" flairs at that point? Better and more straightforward idea than ones proposed, wish I was joking.
December 2, 2022 10:57:41
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
I'd say anything crypto bros are into would be something to devoutly avoid, just in general. Warning about new accounts seems halfway-worthwhile, though as the mods' investigation of the bots recently showed, most of those were *not* new accounts. Maybe a "Drive-by" warning for people who do little more than drop short, "Must have been a Chinese drone..."-style one-liners might be useful. Setting up the thresholds for that might be tricky. The QC and tiers business seems less useful and more like setting up a snobby way to encourage groupthink. Why not just have "Blessed Believer" and "Barely-Tolerated Skeptic" flairs at that point?
November 27, 2022 14:40:18
addremovalreason:
1 Follow the Standards of Civility. (mod:
quarkquark_
)
You’re so full of it. Posting the video would result in LESS ridicule. Unless or course the video is BS too.
November 27, 2022 14:39:47
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
You’re so full of it. Posting the video would result in LESS ridicule. Unless or course the video is BS too.
November 27, 2022 14:09:48
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
How could you not? You would see one after 60 seconds. You're a bot or trolling, or a muddier. https://images.search.yahoo.com/search/images;_ylt=AwriircMrINjn70pTwpx.9w4?p=vertical+contrails&fr=yfp-hrmob-s&fr2=piv-web&.tsrc=yfp-hrmob-s
November 27, 2022 13:06:52
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Omg another airplane. Nice waste of time. Blocked.
November 27, 2022 11:33:04
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
It's even weirder on r/aliens they got a ex military mods n stuff
November 27, 2022 11:11:30
addremovalreason:
1 Follow the Standards of Civility. (mod:
quarkquark_
)
I'll be a skeptic until I see it. Then, that day I will become a believer. But nothing has come close. And, I literally live on a ranch in no-where Arizona with 360° unobstructed views of the vast sky and the only cool thing I've seen is a Falcon 9 rocket a couple months back. I feel embarrassed for people who continue to share easily explainable things, like they are looking at the sky for the first time. I might just unfollow this group. I imagine when ET makes itself known it'll be in the news. Until then it's just frustrating to see these bogus UFO sightings.
November 27, 2022 11:10:57
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
I'll be a skeptic until I see it. Then, that day I will become a believer. But nothing has come close. And, I literally live on a ranch in no-where Arizona with 360° unobstructed views of the vast sky and the only cool thing I've seen is a Falcon 9 rocket a couple months back. I feel embarrassed for people who continue to share easily explainable things, like they are looking at the sky for the first time. I might just unfollow this group. I imagine when ET makes itself known it'll be in the news. Until then it's just frustrating to see these bogus UFO sightings.
November 27, 2022 11:10:23
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
There are releases of energy in interstellar space that make a nuclear weapon look like a tinker toy. Your opinions are those of a child. Don't speak to me any longer.
November 27, 2022 10:59:38
wikirevise:
Page usernotes edited "create new note on new user bsfurr" via toolbox (mod:
quarkquark_
)
November 27, 2022 10:21:35
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Don't be discouraged by these people, they aren't real people. I don't think these are planes either. Maybe if you can get some better shots, perhaps showing the shapes of the darker objects, and longer clips, showing the behavior, we can defend you. They can say these are airplane contrails, because contrails exist, they haven't seen enough actual contrails to notice a difference, and they feel safe in this assumption.
November 27, 2022 10:07:13
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
The sub is full of fucking idiots
November 27, 2022 09:22:23
distinguish:
(mod:
quarkquark_
)
Hi, beerleaguer69. Thanks for contributing. However, your [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/z5tc5g/-/ixy9hx2/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 2: This subreddit is specifically for the discussion of Unidentified Flying Objects. Please post other topics to their appropriate subreddits. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) if you feel this was in error.
November 27, 2022 09:20:12
removecomment:
remove (mod:
quarkquark_
)
https://www.hockey-reference.com/players/g/gravery01.html
November 26, 2022 15:05:42
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Shapeshifting posts coming in...3....2....1... ''I saw the exact same thing but it was another shape and color and didnt look like that at all'' Sorry I'm pissed at this thread. It's a plane.
November 26, 2022 15:04:55
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
I wish people who post sightings would share a specific location, date, time and direction of the sighting without people needing to ask them instead of saying things like ["the general location is the east coast."](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/z5br44/comment/ixv7c5y/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3) Almost like OP knows what this object is and are trying to keep it as vague and low information as possible to "protect their privacy."
November 26, 2022 14:56:54
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Li'l tiny crow legs all spread out as she lays on her back...
November 26, 2022 14:56:54
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
So what's your guess for this one detective?
November 26, 2022 14:56:41
unignorereports:
(mod:
quarkquark_
)
Li'l tiny crow legs all spread out as she lays on her back...
November 26, 2022 14:56:08
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
So what's your guess for this one detective?
November 26, 2022 14:55:18
approvecomment:
confirm_ham (mod:
quarkquark_
)
Li'l tiny crow legs all spread out as she lays on her back...
November 26, 2022 14:49:40
ignorereports:
(mod:
quarkquark_
)
Li'l tiny crow legs all spread out as she lays on her back...
November 26, 2022 14:48:35
unignorereports:
(mod:
quarkquark_
)
Li'l tiny crow legs all spread out as she lays on her back...
November 26, 2022 14:48:34
ignorereports:
(mod:
quarkquark_
)
Li'l tiny crow legs all spread out as she lays on her back...
November 26, 2022 14:30:20
acceptmoderatorinvite:
(mod:
quarkquark_
)
Top